Evaluating the impact of the 'Four Pest-Free Villages' program on mosquito-borne disease control in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitudes, and practices.
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of the 'Four Pest-Free Villages' program on mosquito-borne disease control in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitudes, and practices.","authors":"Jing Ni, Qiyuan Chen, Hui Zhou, Wenrong Zhang, Jinna Wang, Jimin Sun, Zhenyu Gong","doi":"10.1186/s40249-026-01422-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs) pose a persistent public health threat globally. The \"Four Pest-Free Villages\" program, which targets mosquitoes, flies, cockroaches, and rats, has been in place in Zhejiang Province, China, for more than 9 years. It was recently improved to version 4.0 as a crucial tactic for long-term vector management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study, which included eight \"Four Pests Control Villages\" and eight matching control villages, was carried out in 2024 in 16 villages spread across five cities in Zhejiang Province. To evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about infectious diseases spread by mosquitoes, a stratified-cluster random sampling technique was used. In every dimension, KAP ratings of 70% or greater were deemed satisfactory. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to find influential factors (α = 0.05). Ten stakeholders, including community managers, public health specialists, and resident representatives, participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews to further examine the project's efficacy and overall worth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents of the \"Four Pest-Free Village\" (which targets mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents) showed significantly higher levels of knowledge (P < 0.01), attitudes (P < 0.05), and preventive practices (P < 0.01) regarding mosquito-borne diseases compared to control villages, according to 1447 valid questionnaires. While older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7-1.9], higher education (OR = 2.2), and minority status (OR = 2.4, all P < 0.05) predicted better knowledge and attitudes within \"Four Pest-Free Villages\", younger residents, migrant workers, and individual farmers showed higher levels of preventive practice (P < 0.05) in control villages; gender effects on practice varied between sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"Four Pest-Free Village\" program-targeting mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents-significantly improved residents' health literacy and their adoption of vector control practices. This underscores the necessity of customized interventions based on demographic variables and the significance of integrating health education programs with environmental management. The results offer useful recommendations for maximizing vector control initiatives and enhancing public health outcomes in both urban and rural regions. To further improve and bolster these tactics, future studies should incorporate more variables and broaden the data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01422-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs) pose a persistent public health threat globally. The "Four Pest-Free Villages" program, which targets mosquitoes, flies, cockroaches, and rats, has been in place in Zhejiang Province, China, for more than 9 years. It was recently improved to version 4.0 as a crucial tactic for long-term vector management.
Methods: This cross-sectional study, which included eight "Four Pests Control Villages" and eight matching control villages, was carried out in 2024 in 16 villages spread across five cities in Zhejiang Province. To evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about infectious diseases spread by mosquitoes, a stratified-cluster random sampling technique was used. In every dimension, KAP ratings of 70% or greater were deemed satisfactory. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to find influential factors (α = 0.05). Ten stakeholders, including community managers, public health specialists, and resident representatives, participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews to further examine the project's efficacy and overall worth.
Results: Residents of the "Four Pest-Free Village" (which targets mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents) showed significantly higher levels of knowledge (P < 0.01), attitudes (P < 0.05), and preventive practices (P < 0.01) regarding mosquito-borne diseases compared to control villages, according to 1447 valid questionnaires. While older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7-1.9], higher education (OR = 2.2), and minority status (OR = 2.4, all P < 0.05) predicted better knowledge and attitudes within "Four Pest-Free Villages", younger residents, migrant workers, and individual farmers showed higher levels of preventive practice (P < 0.05) in control villages; gender effects on practice varied between sites.
Conclusion: The "Four Pest-Free Village" program-targeting mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents-significantly improved residents' health literacy and their adoption of vector control practices. This underscores the necessity of customized interventions based on demographic variables and the significance of integrating health education programs with environmental management. The results offer useful recommendations for maximizing vector control initiatives and enhancing public health outcomes in both urban and rural regions. To further improve and bolster these tactics, future studies should incorporate more variables and broaden the data sources.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.