Evaluating the impact of the 'Four Pest-Free Villages' program on mosquito-borne disease control in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Jing Ni, Qiyuan Chen, Hui Zhou, Wenrong Zhang, Jinna Wang, Jimin Sun, Zhenyu Gong
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of the 'Four Pest-Free Villages' program on mosquito-borne disease control in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitudes, and practices.","authors":"Jing Ni, Qiyuan Chen, Hui Zhou, Wenrong Zhang, Jinna Wang, Jimin Sun, Zhenyu Gong","doi":"10.1186/s40249-026-01422-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs) pose a persistent public health threat globally. The \"Four Pest-Free Villages\" program, which targets mosquitoes, flies, cockroaches, and rats, has been in place in Zhejiang Province, China, for more than 9 years. It was recently improved to version 4.0 as a crucial tactic for long-term vector management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study, which included eight \"Four Pests Control Villages\" and eight matching control villages, was carried out in 2024 in 16 villages spread across five cities in Zhejiang Province. To evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about infectious diseases spread by mosquitoes, a stratified-cluster random sampling technique was used. In every dimension, KAP ratings of 70% or greater were deemed satisfactory. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to find influential factors (α = 0.05). Ten stakeholders, including community managers, public health specialists, and resident representatives, participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews to further examine the project's efficacy and overall worth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents of the \"Four Pest-Free Village\" (which targets mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents) showed significantly higher levels of knowledge (P < 0.01), attitudes (P < 0.05), and preventive practices (P < 0.01) regarding mosquito-borne diseases compared to control villages, according to 1447 valid questionnaires. While older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7-1.9], higher education (OR = 2.2), and minority status (OR = 2.4, all P < 0.05) predicted better knowledge and attitudes within \"Four Pest-Free Villages\", younger residents, migrant workers, and individual farmers showed higher levels of preventive practice (P < 0.05) in control villages; gender effects on practice varied between sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"Four Pest-Free Village\" program-targeting mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents-significantly improved residents' health literacy and their adoption of vector control practices. This underscores the necessity of customized interventions based on demographic variables and the significance of integrating health education programs with environmental management. The results offer useful recommendations for maximizing vector control initiatives and enhancing public health outcomes in both urban and rural regions. To further improve and bolster these tactics, future studies should incorporate more variables and broaden the data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01422-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs) pose a persistent public health threat globally. The "Four Pest-Free Villages" program, which targets mosquitoes, flies, cockroaches, and rats, has been in place in Zhejiang Province, China, for more than 9 years. It was recently improved to version 4.0 as a crucial tactic for long-term vector management.

Methods: This cross-sectional study, which included eight "Four Pests Control Villages" and eight matching control villages, was carried out in 2024 in 16 villages spread across five cities in Zhejiang Province. To evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about infectious diseases spread by mosquitoes, a stratified-cluster random sampling technique was used. In every dimension, KAP ratings of 70% or greater were deemed satisfactory. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to find influential factors (α = 0.05). Ten stakeholders, including community managers, public health specialists, and resident representatives, participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews to further examine the project's efficacy and overall worth.

Results: Residents of the "Four Pest-Free Village" (which targets mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents) showed significantly higher levels of knowledge (P < 0.01), attitudes (P < 0.05), and preventive practices (P < 0.01) regarding mosquito-borne diseases compared to control villages, according to 1447 valid questionnaires. While older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7-1.9], higher education (OR = 2.2), and minority status (OR = 2.4, all P < 0.05) predicted better knowledge and attitudes within "Four Pest-Free Villages", younger residents, migrant workers, and individual farmers showed higher levels of preventive practice (P < 0.05) in control villages; gender effects on practice varied between sites.

Conclusion: The "Four Pest-Free Village" program-targeting mosquito, fly, cockroach, and rodents-significantly improved residents' health literacy and their adoption of vector control practices. This underscores the necessity of customized interventions based on demographic variables and the significance of integrating health education programs with environmental management. The results offer useful recommendations for maximizing vector control initiatives and enhancing public health outcomes in both urban and rural regions. To further improve and bolster these tactics, future studies should incorporate more variables and broaden the data sources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估中国浙江省“四个无虫村”项目对蚊媒疾病控制的影响:一项关于知识、态度和实践的横断面研究。
背景:蚊媒疾病(MBDs)对全球公共卫生构成持续威胁。以蚊、蝇、蟑螂、鼠为目标的“四村无虫”项目在中国浙江省已经实施了9年多。作为长期矢量管理的关键策略,它最近被改进到4.0版本。方法:采用横断面研究方法,于2024年在浙江省5个城市的16个村进行8个“四防村”和8个配套防治村的研究。采用分层整群随机抽样方法,对蚊虫传播传染病的知识、态度和行为进行评价。在每个维度上,KAP评分达到70%或更高被认为是令人满意的。采用卡方检验和多因素logistic回归分析寻找影响因素(α = 0.05)。包括社区管理人员、公共卫生专家和驻地代表在内的10名利益攸关方参加了深入的半结构化访谈,以进一步审查项目的效力和总体价值。结论:以蚊、蝇、蜚蠊和鼠类为目标的“四村无虫”项目显著提高了居民的健康素养和病媒控制水平。这强调了基于人口变量的定制干预的必要性,以及将健康教育计划与环境管理相结合的重要性。研究结果为最大限度地实施病媒控制举措和加强城市和农村地区的公共卫生成果提供了有益的建议。为了进一步改进和支持这些策略,未来的研究应该纳入更多的变量并拓宽数据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书