Paired associative stimulation with a high-intensity cortical component and a high-frequency peripheral component in treatment of neuropathic pain after incomplete spinal cord injury - a pilot trial.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kirsi Holopainen, Markus Pohjonen, Erika Kirveskari, Selja Vaalto, Jyrki P Mäkelä, Jari Arokoski, Anastasia Shulga
{"title":"Paired associative stimulation with a high-intensity cortical component and a high-frequency peripheral component in treatment of neuropathic pain after incomplete spinal cord injury - a pilot trial.","authors":"Kirsi Holopainen, Markus Pohjonen, Erika Kirveskari, Selja Vaalto, Jyrki P Mäkelä, Jari Arokoski, Anastasia Shulga","doi":"10.1038/s41394-026-00729-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective interventional sham-controlled pilot study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of motor-tract paired-associative stimulation consisting of high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation and high-frequency electric stimulation of peripheral nerves (high-PAS) on moderate-to-severe upper limb neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury compared with sham treatment in the same patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>BioMag Laboratory, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-PAS was applied for 4 weeks to 5 patients with incomplete, non-traumatic SCI and chronic neuropathic pain in upper limb(s). Median, ulnar, and radial nerves of the more painful hand were stimulated. The same patients also received sham stimulation for 4 weeks. Pain was measured with Verbal Rating Scale weekly and with Brief Pain Inventory before and after both stimulation periods and after follow-up of 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinically significant relief in pain was not achieved with high-PAS or sham treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, clinically significant pain relief was not observed with high-PAS compared with sham treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Nevertheless, pain is not a contraindication for high-PAS in rehabilitation. The previously reported positive effect on milder neuropathic pain may be due to improved muscle activity, different pain types, or placebo effect. High-PAS targeting sensory tracts instead of motor tracts merits further investigation for pain treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT05362422.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12957355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-026-00729-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Prospective interventional sham-controlled pilot study.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of motor-tract paired-associative stimulation consisting of high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation and high-frequency electric stimulation of peripheral nerves (high-PAS) on moderate-to-severe upper limb neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury compared with sham treatment in the same patients.

Setting: BioMag Laboratory, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Methods: High-PAS was applied for 4 weeks to 5 patients with incomplete, non-traumatic SCI and chronic neuropathic pain in upper limb(s). Median, ulnar, and radial nerves of the more painful hand were stimulated. The same patients also received sham stimulation for 4 weeks. Pain was measured with Verbal Rating Scale weekly and with Brief Pain Inventory before and after both stimulation periods and after follow-up of 8 weeks.

Results: Clinically significant relief in pain was not achieved with high-PAS or sham treatment.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, clinically significant pain relief was not observed with high-PAS compared with sham treatment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Nevertheless, pain is not a contraindication for high-PAS in rehabilitation. The previously reported positive effect on milder neuropathic pain may be due to improved muscle activity, different pain types, or placebo effect. High-PAS targeting sensory tracts instead of motor tracts merits further investigation for pain treatment.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT05362422.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高强度皮质成分和高频外周成分配对联合刺激治疗不完全性脊髓损伤后神经性疼痛的初步试验
研究设计:前瞻性介入假对照先导研究。目的:探讨由高强度经颅磁刺激和高频电刺激外周神经组成的运动束配对联合刺激(high-PAS)对不完全性脊髓损伤患者中重度上肢神经性疼痛的治疗效果,并与假手术治疗进行比较。单位:赫尔辛基大学生物医学实验室、溶血性尿毒综合征诊断中心和赫尔辛基大学医院,芬兰赫尔辛基。方法:对5例不完全性、非外伤性脊髓损伤伴上肢慢性神经性疼痛的患者应用高pas治疗4周。刺激较痛手的正中神经、尺神经和桡神经。同样的患者也接受了4周的假刺激。在刺激前后和随访8周后分别用每周口头评定量表和简短疼痛量表测量疼痛。结果:高pas或假治疗均未达到临床显著的疼痛缓解。结论:在这项初步研究中,与假治疗相比,高pas治疗未观察到临床显著的疼痛缓解。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。然而,疼痛并不是高pas康复治疗的禁忌症。先前报道的对轻度神经性疼痛的积极作用可能是由于肌肉活动的改善,不同的疼痛类型,或安慰剂效应。高pas靶向感觉束而非运动束的疼痛治疗值得进一步研究。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov,编号NCT05362422。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书