Application of a framework to mitigate the risk of surgical site infection after exploratory celiotomy in horses: A retrospective study.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1111/vsu.70061
Carla Lopez Cruz, Liara M Gonzalez, Caroline A McKinney-Aguirre, Kate L Hepworth-Warren, Holly A Roessner, Megan Burke, Callie A Fogle
{"title":"Application of a framework to mitigate the risk of surgical site infection after exploratory celiotomy in horses: A retrospective study.","authors":"Carla Lopez Cruz, Liara M Gonzalez, Caroline A McKinney-Aguirre, Kate L Hepworth-Warren, Holly A Roessner, Megan Burke, Callie A Fogle","doi":"10.1111/vsu.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the methodology used to identify the contributors to a perceived sudden increase in exploratory celiotomy surgical site infections (SSI) and complications at the North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (NCSU VTH) between 2019 and 2020 and evaluate the effect of the designed intervention up to 4 years after its implementation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control retrospective study over a five-year period.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 448 horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy for the treatment of acute abdominal pain were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy between 2019-2024 were reviewed from software systems used at the NCSU VTH. A surgical audit was conducted to assess adherence to best practices and identify factors contributing to increased SSI incidence. This led to the development of an evidence-based intervention to address procedural deficiencies and incorporate preventative perioperative strategies. The approach, resultant protocols, and reduction of SSI incidence are described. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and univariate logistic regression. Statistical significance was set to p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in %SSI was observed from 7.7% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 (p = .0067). Following new protocol implementation, %SSI decreased to 2.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A surgical audit enabled the development of an evidence-based intervention that significantly reduced SSI incidence after exploratory celiotomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Surgical audits serve as critical quality-of-care measure, allowing hospitals to identify procedural deficiencies. There is currently no literature that describes structured processes to manage this kind of problem in veterinary medicine. Surgical audit implementation may help other hospitals faced with similar challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"543-556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the methodology used to identify the contributors to a perceived sudden increase in exploratory celiotomy surgical site infections (SSI) and complications at the North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (NCSU VTH) between 2019 and 2020 and evaluate the effect of the designed intervention up to 4 years after its implementation.

Study design: Case-control retrospective study over a five-year period.

Animals: A total of 448 horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy for the treatment of acute abdominal pain were included.

Methods: Medical records of horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy between 2019-2024 were reviewed from software systems used at the NCSU VTH. A surgical audit was conducted to assess adherence to best practices and identify factors contributing to increased SSI incidence. This led to the development of an evidence-based intervention to address procedural deficiencies and incorporate preventative perioperative strategies. The approach, resultant protocols, and reduction of SSI incidence are described. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and univariate logistic regression. Statistical significance was set to p < .05.

Results: A significant increase in %SSI was observed from 7.7% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 (p = .0067). Following new protocol implementation, %SSI decreased to 2.3%.

Conclusion: A surgical audit enabled the development of an evidence-based intervention that significantly reduced SSI incidence after exploratory celiotomy surgery.

Clinical significance: Surgical audits serve as critical quality-of-care measure, allowing hospitals to identify procedural deficiencies. There is currently no literature that describes structured processes to manage this kind of problem in veterinary medicine. Surgical audit implementation may help other hospitals faced with similar challenges.

应用框架减轻探查性开腹后马手术部位感染的风险:一项回顾性研究。
目的:描述用于识别2019年至2020年期间北卡罗莱纳州立大学兽医教学医院(NCSU VTH)探查性切口手术部位感染(SSI)和并发症突然增加的因素的方法,并评估设计干预措施实施后长达4年的效果。研究设计:为期5年的病例对照回顾性研究。动物:共纳入448匹接受探查性剖腹术治疗急性腹痛的马。方法:从NCSU VTH使用的软件系统中回顾2019-2024年期间接受探索性剖宫产术的马匹的医疗记录。进行手术审计以评估对最佳实践的依从性,并确定导致SSI发生率增加的因素。这导致了循证干预的发展,以解决程序缺陷并纳入预防性围手术期策略。方法,由此产生的协议,并减少SSI发生率进行了描述。数据分析采用Fisher精确检验和单变量逻辑回归。结果:%SSI从2019年的7.7%显著增加到2020年的29% (p = 0.0067)。在新协议实施后,%SSI下降到2.3%。结论:外科审计使循证干预的发展能够显著降低探查性剖腹手术后SSI的发生率。临床意义:外科审计是关键的护理质量措施,允许医院识别程序缺陷。目前还没有文献描述了在兽医学中管理这类问题的结构化过程。外科审计的实施可以帮助其他医院面临类似的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书