Effect of EEG-guided opioid-free anesthesia on perioperative blood glucose variation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiang Yan, Chen Liang, Meng Guo, Jia Jiang, Ying Ji, An-Shi Wu, Chang-Wei Wei
{"title":"Effect of EEG-guided opioid-free anesthesia on perioperative blood glucose variation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Xiang Yan, Chen Liang, Meng Guo, Jia Jiang, Ying Ji, An-Shi Wu, Chang-Wei Wei","doi":"10.1186/s13741-026-00666-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of electroencephalogram-guided opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) on perioperative blood glucose variability in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery. METHODS: This article is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to either the OFA group or the opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) group. Patients in the OFA group did not receive any opioids during surgery, whereas those in the OBA group received sufentanil and remifentanil intraoperatively. The primary end point was the coefficient of variation for glucose (GLUcv), calculated based on predefined time points during the perioperative period. The secondary end points were the mean of glucose (GLUmean), the standard deviation of glucose (GLUSD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE). RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included in the final analysis: the OFA group (n = 64) and the OBA group (n = 62). Blood pressure, heart rate, sedation index, and analgesia index during surgery were comparable between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in pain in the early postoperative period. The primary end point, GLUCV, was significantly higher in OFA group than in OBA group (22.7 ± 9.1 vs 14.1 ± 6.0, P < 0.001). In addition, the OFA group had higher GLUmean (5.68 ± 0.87 vs 5.31 ± 0.87 mmol/L, P = 0.003), GLUSD (1.3 ± 0.59 vs 0.76 ± 0.40 mmol/L, P < 0.001), MAGE (1.75 ± 0.86 vs 0.95 ± 0.54 mmol/L, P < 0.001), and LAGE (2.97 ± 1.35 vs 1.72 ± 0.96 mmol/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The OFA regimen provides sedation and analgesia comparable to OBA in video-assisted thoracic surgery, but is associated with greater perioperative blood glucose variation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05411159. First posted date: 9 Jun, 2022. Date of enrolment of the first research participant: 10 Jun, 2022. </p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13085272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00666-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of electroencephalogram-guided opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) on perioperative blood glucose variability in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery. METHODS: This article is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to either the OFA group or the opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) group. Patients in the OFA group did not receive any opioids during surgery, whereas those in the OBA group received sufentanil and remifentanil intraoperatively. The primary end point was the coefficient of variation for glucose (GLUcv), calculated based on predefined time points during the perioperative period. The secondary end points were the mean of glucose (GLUmean), the standard deviation of glucose (GLUSD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE). RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included in the final analysis: the OFA group (n = 64) and the OBA group (n = 62). Blood pressure, heart rate, sedation index, and analgesia index during surgery were comparable between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in pain in the early postoperative period. The primary end point, GLUCV, was significantly higher in OFA group than in OBA group (22.7 ± 9.1 vs 14.1 ± 6.0, P < 0.001). In addition, the OFA group had higher GLUmean (5.68 ± 0.87 vs 5.31 ± 0.87 mmol/L, P = 0.003), GLUSD (1.3 ± 0.59 vs 0.76 ± 0.40 mmol/L, P < 0.001), MAGE (1.75 ± 0.86 vs 0.95 ± 0.54 mmol/L, P < 0.001), and LAGE (2.97 ± 1.35 vs 1.72 ± 0.96 mmol/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The OFA regimen provides sedation and analgesia comparable to OBA in video-assisted thoracic surgery, but is associated with greater perioperative blood glucose variation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05411159. First posted date: 9 Jun, 2022. Date of enrolment of the first research participant: 10 Jun, 2022.

脑电图引导下无阿片类药物麻醉对胸外科手术患者围手术期血糖变化的影响:一项随机对照研究的二次分析
目的:评价脑电图引导下无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)对胸外科手术患者围手术期血糖变异性的影响。方法:本文是一项随机对照试验的二次分析。符合条件的患者被随机分配到OFA组或阿片类药物麻醉(OBA)组。OFA组患者术中未接受任何阿片类药物治疗,而OBA组患者术中接受舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼治疗。主要终点是葡萄糖变异系数(GLUcv),根据围手术期预定的时间点计算。次要终点为血糖平均值(GLUmean)、血糖标准差(GLUSD)、血糖偏移平均幅度(MAGE)和最大血糖偏移幅度(LAGE)。结果:共126例患者纳入最终分析:OFA组(n = 64)和OBA组(n = 62)。两组患者术中血压、心率、镇静指数、镇痛指数具有可比性,术后早期疼痛无显著差异。OFA组的主要终点GLUCV明显高于OBA组(22.7±9.1 vs 14.1±6.0,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书