Reliable Outcomes of Free Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Complex Oncologic Scalp Reconstruction: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jenny Chen, Ayana Cole-Price, Geoffrey E Hespe, Farooq Shahzad, Jonas Nelson, Evan Matros, Robert J Allen, Kyeong-Tae Lee
{"title":"Reliable Outcomes of Free Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Complex Oncologic Scalp Reconstruction: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Jenny Chen, Ayana Cole-Price, Geoffrey E Hespe, Farooq Shahzad, Jonas Nelson, Evan Matros, Robert J Allen, Kyeong-Tae Lee","doi":"10.1055/a-2824-5745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scalp reconstruction following oncologic resection can be challenging due to the presence of complicating factors such as extensive defects, cranioplasty, and radiotherapy, frequently requiring the need for free tissue transfer. While musculocutaneous flaps have traditionally been used, fasciocutaneous flaps are increasingly favored. However, their safety in these high-risk conditions remains unclear. This study examines whether flap type influences outcomes in oncologic scalp reconstruction.A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent microsurgical scalp reconstruction for oncologic defects between 2018 and 2024 at two tertiary centers. Patients were grouped into musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flap cohorts. Postoperative complication rates were compared between the groups across various clinical settings.A total of 109 patients were included: 35 (32.1%) underwent musculocutaneous flap reconstruction, and 74 (67.9%) received fasciocutaneous flaps. The most commonly used flaps were the latissimus dorsi and anterolateral thigh flaps, respectively. The musculocutaneous group had more comorbidities, more frequent irradiation history, and larger defects. Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (33.9%), most commonly delayed wound healing. Overall and specific complication rates were similar between groups, except for late complications (occurring or persisting beyond 3 months), which were more frequent in the musculocutaneous group. This pattern held across subgroups defined by cranioplasty, radiotherapy, and defect size. Flap type did not independently predict complications on multivariable analysis.Our results suggest that both musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps are effective for oncologic scalp reconstruction. Fasciocutaneous flaps appear to be a reliable alternative, even in complex cases involving radiotherapy, cranioplasty, or extensive defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2824-5745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scalp reconstruction following oncologic resection can be challenging due to the presence of complicating factors such as extensive defects, cranioplasty, and radiotherapy, frequently requiring the need for free tissue transfer. While musculocutaneous flaps have traditionally been used, fasciocutaneous flaps are increasingly favored. However, their safety in these high-risk conditions remains unclear. This study examines whether flap type influences outcomes in oncologic scalp reconstruction.A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent microsurgical scalp reconstruction for oncologic defects between 2018 and 2024 at two tertiary centers. Patients were grouped into musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flap cohorts. Postoperative complication rates were compared between the groups across various clinical settings.A total of 109 patients were included: 35 (32.1%) underwent musculocutaneous flap reconstruction, and 74 (67.9%) received fasciocutaneous flaps. The most commonly used flaps were the latissimus dorsi and anterolateral thigh flaps, respectively. The musculocutaneous group had more comorbidities, more frequent irradiation history, and larger defects. Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (33.9%), most commonly delayed wound healing. Overall and specific complication rates were similar between groups, except for late complications (occurring or persisting beyond 3 months), which were more frequent in the musculocutaneous group. This pattern held across subgroups defined by cranioplasty, radiotherapy, and defect size. Flap type did not independently predict complications on multivariable analysis.Our results suggest that both musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps are effective for oncologic scalp reconstruction. Fasciocutaneous flaps appear to be a reliable alternative, even in complex cases involving radiotherapy, cranioplasty, or extensive defects.

自由筋膜皮瓣用于复杂肿瘤头皮重建的可靠结果:一项多中心比较分析。
背景:肿瘤头皮重建是特别具有挑战性的,因为经常需要自由皮瓣和复杂的设置涉及广泛的缺陷,颅骨成形术和围手术期放疗。虽然传统上使用肌皮瓣,但筋膜皮瓣越来越受到青睐。然而,它们在这些高风险条件下的安全性仍不清楚。本研究探讨皮瓣类型是否影响肿瘤头皮重建的结果。方法:回顾性分析2018年至2024年在两家三级中心接受显微外科头皮重建治疗肿瘤缺损的患者。患者分为肌皮瓣组和筋膜皮瓣组。比较两组在不同临床环境下的术后并发症发生率。结果:109例患者行肌皮瓣重建35例(32.1%),筋膜皮瓣重建74例(67.9%)。最常用的皮瓣分别是背阔肌皮瓣和大腿前外侧皮瓣。肌肉皮肤组有更多的合并症,更频繁的辐照史和更大的缺陷。术后并发症37例(33.9%),最常见的是伤口愈合延迟。除了后期并发症(发生或持续超过3个月)在肌肉皮肤组更常见外,两组之间的总体和特定并发症发生率相似。这种模式适用于由颅骨成形术、放疗和缺损大小定义的亚组。在多变量分析中,皮瓣类型不能独立预测并发症。结论:肌皮瓣和筋膜皮瓣均可用于肿瘤头皮重建。筋膜皮瓣似乎是一个可靠的选择,即使在复杂的情况下涉及放疗,颅骨成形术,或广泛的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书