Consistent Detection of Aquaporin-4 Antibodies: A Comparative Analysis Between Fixed and Live Cell-Based Assays.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jing Wang, Linge Wang, Xiaolin Yang, Zhizhong Li, Jinyu Jiang, Qiao Xu, Siyuan Huang, Qing Fu, Yang Yang, Rongrong Zhang, Lin Yang, Ai Chen, Xiaopeng Zeng, Ke Xu, Peng Zheng, Xinyue Qin, Jinzhou Feng
{"title":"Consistent Detection of Aquaporin-4 Antibodies: A Comparative Analysis Between Fixed and Live Cell-Based Assays.","authors":"Jing Wang, Linge Wang, Xiaolin Yang, Zhizhong Li, Jinyu Jiang, Qiao Xu, Siyuan Huang, Qing Fu, Yang Yang, Rongrong Zhang, Lin Yang, Ai Chen, Xiaopeng Zeng, Ke Xu, Peng Zheng, Xinyue Qin, Jinzhou Feng","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2025.0321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Live cell-based assays (LCBA) are increasingly used for serological antibody detection due to their ability to preserve antigen conformation, offering moderately higher sensitivity than fixed cell-based assays. However, the clinical necessity of prioritizing LCBA for the detection of aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unclear, especially when compared to its established role in diagnosing myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the performance of live cell-based assays using immunofluorescence (LCBA-IF) and fixed cell-based assays using immunofluorescence (FCBA-IF) in detecting AQP4-IgG in 90 cases of NMOSD meeting 2015 International Panel for Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis criteria, alongside 40 controls. Additionally, we further investigated the relationship between AQP4-IgG titers as measured by LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF and clinical parameters in NMOSD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed 96.9% agreement between LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF (Cohen's κ=0.935), with a strong Spearman correlation (0.977, <i>p</i><0.001). Both methods demonstrated 100% specificity, with LCBA-IF showing slightly higher sensitivity compared to FCBA-IF. Within LCBA-IF-tested groups, statistically significant differences in annualized relapse rates were observed across all pairwise comparisons (low-titer vs. moderate-titer, low-titer vs. high-titer, and moderate-titer vs. high-titer; all <i>p</i><0.050). However, this association reached statistical significance in some FCBA-IF-tested groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, there is a strong concordance between LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF in detecting AQP4-IgG, where LCBA-IF shows slightly higher sensitivity. Furthermore, there is a potential link between elevated AQP4-IgG titers and an increased risk of relapse, and this correlation may appear more pronounced when using LCBA-IF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"22 2","pages":"212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Live cell-based assays (LCBA) are increasingly used for serological antibody detection due to their ability to preserve antigen conformation, offering moderately higher sensitivity than fixed cell-based assays. However, the clinical necessity of prioritizing LCBA for the detection of aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unclear, especially when compared to its established role in diagnosing myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.

Methods: We compared the performance of live cell-based assays using immunofluorescence (LCBA-IF) and fixed cell-based assays using immunofluorescence (FCBA-IF) in detecting AQP4-IgG in 90 cases of NMOSD meeting 2015 International Panel for Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis criteria, alongside 40 controls. Additionally, we further investigated the relationship between AQP4-IgG titers as measured by LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF and clinical parameters in NMOSD patients.

Results: Results showed 96.9% agreement between LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF (Cohen's κ=0.935), with a strong Spearman correlation (0.977, p<0.001). Both methods demonstrated 100% specificity, with LCBA-IF showing slightly higher sensitivity compared to FCBA-IF. Within LCBA-IF-tested groups, statistically significant differences in annualized relapse rates were observed across all pairwise comparisons (low-titer vs. moderate-titer, low-titer vs. high-titer, and moderate-titer vs. high-titer; all p<0.050). However, this association reached statistical significance in some FCBA-IF-tested groups.

Conclusions: Overall, there is a strong concordance between LCBA-IF and FCBA-IF in detecting AQP4-IgG, where LCBA-IF shows slightly higher sensitivity. Furthermore, there is a potential link between elevated AQP4-IgG titers and an increased risk of relapse, and this correlation may appear more pronounced when using LCBA-IF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

水通道蛋白-4抗体的一致性检测:固定和活细胞检测的比较分析。
背景和目的:基于活细胞的检测(LCBA)越来越多地用于血清学抗体检测,因为它们能够保持抗原构象,比基于固定细胞的检测提供更高的灵敏度。然而,在视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)中优先使用LCBA检测水通道蛋白-4免疫球蛋白G (AQP4-IgG)的临床必要性尚不清楚,特别是与LCBA在诊断髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病中的既定作用相比。方法:我们比较了基于活细胞的免疫荧光法(LCBA-IF)和基于固定细胞的免疫荧光法(FCBA-IF)在90例符合2015年国际视神经脊髓炎诊断标准的NMOSD患者中检测AQP4-IgG的性能,并与40例对照组进行了比较。此外,我们进一步研究了NMOSD患者LCBA-IF和FCBA-IF测定的AQP4-IgG滴度与临床参数的关系。结果:LCBA-IF与FCBA-IF检测AQP4-IgG的一致性为96.9% (Cohen’s κ=0.935), Spearman相关性为0.977,ppp。结论:总体而言,LCBA-IF与FCBA-IF检测AQP4-IgG具有较强的一致性,其中LCBA-IF检测灵敏度略高。此外,AQP4-IgG滴度升高与复发风险增加之间存在潜在联系,使用lbaa - if时,这种相关性可能更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurology
Journal of Clinical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书