Su Jeong Yang, Jae-Sung Lim, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim, Sang Joon Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, Chong Hyun Suh
{"title":"Comparing Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging and T2* Gradient-Recalled Echo for Cerebral Microbleeds Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Su Jeong Yang, Jae-Sung Lim, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim, Sang Joon Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, Chong Hyun Suh","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2025.0324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Criteria for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in anti-amyloid therapy are based on T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE), but susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is widely used, creating uncertainty. This study quantitatively compared the detectability of SWI and GRE for cerebral microbleeds and established evidence supporting distinct microbleed criteria for each.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies directly comparing SWI and GRE up to August 8, 2024. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. The pooled proportion of microbleed detection and detection ratio were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on magnetic field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and SWI slice thickness (<2 mm vs. ≥2 mm), equipment vendor, and study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included. SWI detected cerebral microbleeds approximately 1.6 times more effectively than GRE. At 3.0 T and 1.5 T, SWI exhibited 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold greater detectability, respectively. SWI with thinner slices (<2 mm) showed a 1.9-fold improvement, while thicker slices (≥2 mm) showed a 1.3-fold improvement. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between vendors (0.61 vs. 0.60, <i>p</i>=0.89), or by study quality (0.61 vs. 0.59, <i>p</i>=0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWI detects cerebral microbleeds about 1.6 times more effectively than GRE, highlighting important differences between the two techniques. Cautious exploration of adjusted thresholds may be needed, and prospective validation in therapy-specific cohorts will be essential before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"22 2","pages":"193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Criteria for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in anti-amyloid therapy are based on T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE), but susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is widely used, creating uncertainty. This study quantitatively compared the detectability of SWI and GRE for cerebral microbleeds and established evidence supporting distinct microbleed criteria for each.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies directly comparing SWI and GRE up to August 8, 2024. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. The pooled proportion of microbleed detection and detection ratio were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on magnetic field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and SWI slice thickness (<2 mm vs. ≥2 mm), equipment vendor, and study quality.
Results: Thirteen studies were included. SWI detected cerebral microbleeds approximately 1.6 times more effectively than GRE. At 3.0 T and 1.5 T, SWI exhibited 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold greater detectability, respectively. SWI with thinner slices (<2 mm) showed a 1.9-fold improvement, while thicker slices (≥2 mm) showed a 1.3-fold improvement. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between vendors (0.61 vs. 0.60, p=0.89), or by study quality (0.61 vs. 0.59, p=0.89).
Conclusions: SWI detects cerebral microbleeds about 1.6 times more effectively than GRE, highlighting important differences between the two techniques. Cautious exploration of adjusted thresholds may be needed, and prospective validation in therapy-specific cohorts will be essential before clinical application.
背景与目的:抗淀粉样蛋白治疗中淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常的标准是基于T2*梯度回忆回声(GRE),但敏感性加权成像(SWI)被广泛使用,产生了不确定性。本研究定量比较了SWI和GRE对脑微出血的检出率,并建立了支持各自不同微出血标准的证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在PubMed和Embase检索直接比较SWI和GRE的研究,截止到2024年8月8日。采用QUADAS-2评估研究质量。计算微出血检出率和检出率。根据磁场强度(1.5 T vs. 3 T)和SWI切片厚度进行亚组分析(结果:纳入13项研究。SWI检测脑微出血的效率大约是GRE的1.6倍。在3.0 T和1.5 T时,SWI的检出率分别提高了1.7倍和1.5倍。薄片较薄的SWI (p=0.89)或研究质量(0.61 vs. 0.59, p=0.89)。结论:SWI检测脑微出血的效率约为GRE的1.6倍,突出了两种技术之间的重要差异。可能需要谨慎探索调整后的阈值,并且在临床应用之前,在治疗特异性队列中进行前瞻性验证是必不可少的。
期刊介绍:
The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.