Comparing Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging and T2* Gradient-Recalled Echo for Cerebral Microbleeds Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Su Jeong Yang, Jae-Sung Lim, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim, Sang Joon Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, Chong Hyun Suh
{"title":"Comparing Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging and T2* Gradient-Recalled Echo for Cerebral Microbleeds Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Su Jeong Yang, Jae-Sung Lim, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim, Sang Joon Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, Chong Hyun Suh","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2025.0324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Criteria for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in anti-amyloid therapy are based on T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE), but susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is widely used, creating uncertainty. This study quantitatively compared the detectability of SWI and GRE for cerebral microbleeds and established evidence supporting distinct microbleed criteria for each.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies directly comparing SWI and GRE up to August 8, 2024. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. The pooled proportion of microbleed detection and detection ratio were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on magnetic field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and SWI slice thickness (<2 mm vs. ≥2 mm), equipment vendor, and study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included. SWI detected cerebral microbleeds approximately 1.6 times more effectively than GRE. At 3.0 T and 1.5 T, SWI exhibited 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold greater detectability, respectively. SWI with thinner slices (<2 mm) showed a 1.9-fold improvement, while thicker slices (≥2 mm) showed a 1.3-fold improvement. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between vendors (0.61 vs. 0.60, <i>p</i>=0.89), or by study quality (0.61 vs. 0.59, <i>p</i>=0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWI detects cerebral microbleeds about 1.6 times more effectively than GRE, highlighting important differences between the two techniques. Cautious exploration of adjusted thresholds may be needed, and prospective validation in therapy-specific cohorts will be essential before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"22 2","pages":"193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Criteria for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in anti-amyloid therapy are based on T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE), but susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is widely used, creating uncertainty. This study quantitatively compared the detectability of SWI and GRE for cerebral microbleeds and established evidence supporting distinct microbleed criteria for each.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies directly comparing SWI and GRE up to August 8, 2024. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. The pooled proportion of microbleed detection and detection ratio were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on magnetic field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and SWI slice thickness (<2 mm vs. ≥2 mm), equipment vendor, and study quality.

Results: Thirteen studies were included. SWI detected cerebral microbleeds approximately 1.6 times more effectively than GRE. At 3.0 T and 1.5 T, SWI exhibited 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold greater detectability, respectively. SWI with thinner slices (<2 mm) showed a 1.9-fold improvement, while thicker slices (≥2 mm) showed a 1.3-fold improvement. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between vendors (0.61 vs. 0.60, p=0.89), or by study quality (0.61 vs. 0.59, p=0.89).

Conclusions: SWI detects cerebral microbleeds about 1.6 times more effectively than GRE, highlighting important differences between the two techniques. Cautious exploration of adjusted thresholds may be needed, and prospective validation in therapy-specific cohorts will be essential before clinical application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

敏感性加权成像与T2*梯度回忆回波检测脑微出血的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:抗淀粉样蛋白治疗中淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常的标准是基于T2*梯度回忆回声(GRE),但敏感性加权成像(SWI)被广泛使用,产生了不确定性。本研究定量比较了SWI和GRE对脑微出血的检出率,并建立了支持各自不同微出血标准的证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在PubMed和Embase检索直接比较SWI和GRE的研究,截止到2024年8月8日。采用QUADAS-2评估研究质量。计算微出血检出率和检出率。根据磁场强度(1.5 T vs. 3 T)和SWI切片厚度进行亚组分析(结果:纳入13项研究。SWI检测脑微出血的效率大约是GRE的1.6倍。在3.0 T和1.5 T时,SWI的检出率分别提高了1.7倍和1.5倍。薄片较薄的SWI (p=0.89)或研究质量(0.61 vs. 0.59, p=0.89)。结论:SWI检测脑微出血的效率约为GRE的1.6倍,突出了两种技术之间的重要差异。可能需要谨慎探索调整后的阈值,并且在临床应用之前,在治疗特异性队列中进行前瞻性验证是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurology
Journal of Clinical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书