Predictive Value of Existing Prediction Models for Short-Term Outcomes after Percutaneous Intramyocardial Septal Radiofrequency Ablation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1159/000551275
Jiaqi Yin, Shengjun Ta, Jing Wang, David H Hsi, Bo Shan, Jing Li, Wenxia Li, Rui Hu, Bo Wang, Nan Kang, Lu Yao, Fangqi Ruan, Jiao Liu, Yupeng Han, Xueli Zhao, Liwen Liu
{"title":"Predictive Value of Existing Prediction Models for Short-Term Outcomes after Percutaneous Intramyocardial Septal Radiofrequency Ablation.","authors":"Jiaqi Yin, Shengjun Ta, Jing Wang, David H Hsi, Bo Shan, Jing Li, Wenxia Li, Rui Hu, Bo Wang, Nan Kang, Lu Yao, Fangqi Ruan, Jiao Liu, Yupeng Han, Xueli Zhao, Liwen Liu","doi":"10.1159/000551275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous IntraMyocardial Septal Radiofrequency Ablation (PIMSRA, Liwen procedure) is a novel septal reduction therapy (SRT) for drug-refractory hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients. Due to the lack of SRT risk tools, EuroSCORE-II, STS-PROM, and HCM Risk-SCD have been considered as potential alternatives for risk assessment prior to SRT. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of these models for short-term adverse events in HOCM patients undergoing PIMSRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 571 HOCM patients treated with PIMSRA in Xijing Hospital from October 2016 to June 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and their risk scores were calculated. The primary outcome was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including a composite of all-cause death, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmic events, cardiogenic shock, and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 30-day follow-up, 61 (10.7%) patients experienced MACE. Multivariate analysis revealed that EuroSCORE-II (OR = 2.30), STS-PROM (OR = 1.18), history of syncope, and peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient were independently associated with MACE risk after PIMSRA. The area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve values were 0.657 (95% CI: 0.581-0.733) for EuroSCORE-II, 0.623 (95% CI: 0.551-0.696) for STS-PROM, and 0.550 (95% CI: 0.469-0.631) for HCM Risk-SCD. Calibration metrics for three models were favorable because of the low incidence of MACE. DCA showed limited benefit to using any score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EuroSCORE-II, STS-PROM, history of syncope, and peak LVOT gradient were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day MACE following PIMSRA. Developing SRT-specific risk prediction models is essential for optimizing SRT risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous IntraMyocardial Septal Radiofrequency Ablation (PIMSRA, Liwen procedure) is a novel septal reduction therapy (SRT) for drug-refractory hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients. Due to the lack of SRT risk tools, EuroSCORE-II, STS-PROM, and HCM Risk-SCD have been considered as potential alternatives for risk assessment prior to SRT. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of these models for short-term adverse events in HOCM patients undergoing PIMSRA.

Methods: A total of 571 HOCM patients treated with PIMSRA in Xijing Hospital from October 2016 to June 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and their risk scores were calculated. The primary outcome was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including a composite of all-cause death, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmic events, cardiogenic shock, and stroke.

Results: During the 30-day follow-up, 61 (10.7%) patients experienced MACE. Multivariate analysis revealed that EuroSCORE-II (OR = 2.30), STS-PROM (OR = 1.18), history of syncope, and peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient were independently associated with MACE risk after PIMSRA. The area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve values were 0.657 (95% CI: 0.581-0.733) for EuroSCORE-II, 0.623 (95% CI: 0.551-0.696) for STS-PROM, and 0.550 (95% CI: 0.469-0.631) for HCM Risk-SCD. Calibration metrics for three models were favorable because of the low incidence of MACE. DCA showed limited benefit to using any score.

Conclusion: EuroSCORE-II, STS-PROM, history of syncope, and peak LVOT gradient were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day MACE following PIMSRA. Developing SRT-specific risk prediction models is essential for optimizing SRT risk assessment.

现有预测模型对经皮心间隔内射频消融术后短期预后的预测价值。
背景:经皮心间隔射频消融术(PIMSRA, Liwen手术)是治疗药物难治性肥厚性梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)患者的一种新型间隔缩小疗法(SRT)。由于SRT风险工具的缺乏,EuroSCORE-Ⅱ、STS-PROM和HCM risk - scd被认为是SRT之前风险评估的潜在替代方案。我们的目的是评估这些模型对接受PIMSRA的HOCM患者的短期不良事件的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2016年10月至2024年6月在西京医院接受PIMSRA治疗的571例HOCM患者,计算其风险评分。主要终点是30天主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,包括全因死亡、心包填塞、心律失常事件、心源性休克和中风的综合发生率。结果:在30天的随访中,61例(10.7%)患者出现MACE。多因素分析显示,EuroSCORE-Ⅱ(OR= 2.30)、STS-PROM (OR= 1.18)、晕厥史和左心室流出道(LVOT)峰值梯度与PIMSRA术后MACE风险独立相关。EuroSCORE-Ⅱ的受试者工作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积为0.657 (95% CI: 0.581-0.733), STS-PROM的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.623 (95% CI: 0.551-0.696), HCM Risk-SCD的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.550 (95% CI: 0.469-0.631)。由于MACE发生率低,三种模型的校准指标都是有利的。DCA对使用任何评分的益处有限。结论:EuroSCORE-Ⅱ、STS-PROM、晕厥史和LVOT峰值梯度与PIMSRA术后30天MACE风险增加独立相关。建立SRT风险预测模型是优化SRT风险评估的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书