Utilizing APACHE II score for early detection of deterioration in neurosurgery ICU: a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2026.2640593
Suhaimi Fauzan, Dikki Saputra, Muhammad Ibnu Kahtan, Costan Tryono Parulian Rumapea
{"title":"Utilizing APACHE II score for early detection of deterioration in neurosurgery ICU: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Suhaimi Fauzan, Dikki Saputra, Muhammad Ibnu Kahtan, Costan Tryono Parulian Rumapea","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2026.2640593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the use of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score as a proactive clinical tool to enhance Quality of Care (QoC), providing empirical evidence for critical nursing practice in detecting patient deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study analyzed 76 neurosurgery ICU patients at a tertiary referral hospital. The first 24-hour APACHE II score was calculated to determine its association with clinical deterioration within the first 48 hours. An APACHE II score of ≥16 was established as the cutoff point to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APACHE II score demonstrated strong prognostic accuracy in predicting mortality (AUC 0.779, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, a high-risk APACHE II score (≥16) was significantly associated with the incidence of early clinical deterioration within the first 48 hours (27.3% vs. 4.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides empirical validation of APACHE II in this neurosurgery cohort, demonstrating good prognostic accuracy. The significant association established between high initial scores and early clinical deterioration suggests its potential utility as an objective trigger for enhanced monitoring. These findings support a shift toward using the score proactively, although validation in larger multi-center cohorts is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"643-649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2026.2640593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the use of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score as a proactive clinical tool to enhance Quality of Care (QoC), providing empirical evidence for critical nursing practice in detecting patient deterioration.

Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed 76 neurosurgery ICU patients at a tertiary referral hospital. The first 24-hour APACHE II score was calculated to determine its association with clinical deterioration within the first 48 hours. An APACHE II score of ≥16 was established as the cutoff point to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.

Results: The APACHE II score demonstrated strong prognostic accuracy in predicting mortality (AUC 0.779, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a high-risk APACHE II score (≥16) was significantly associated with the incidence of early clinical deterioration within the first 48 hours (27.3% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.008).

Conclusions: This study provides empirical validation of APACHE II in this neurosurgery cohort, demonstrating good prognostic accuracy. The significant association established between high initial scores and early clinical deterioration suggests its potential utility as an objective trigger for enhanced monitoring. These findings support a shift toward using the score proactively, although validation in larger multi-center cohorts is required.

利用APACHE II评分早期检测神经外科ICU病情恶化:一项前瞻性队列研究。
简介:本研究旨在评估急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分作为提高护理质量(QoC)的主动临床工具的使用,为检测患者恶化的关键护理实践提供经验证据。方法:本前瞻性队列研究分析了某三级转诊医院76例神经外科ICU患者。计算第一个24小时APACHE II评分,以确定其与前48小时内临床恶化的关系。APACHE II评分≥16分作为分界点,将患者分为高危组和低危组。结果:APACHE II评分在预测死亡率方面具有很强的预后准确性(AUC 0.779, p p = 0.008)。结论:本研究提供了APACHE II在该神经外科队列中的经验验证,显示出良好的预后准确性。高初始评分与早期临床恶化之间建立的显著关联表明,它作为加强监测的客观触发因素的潜在效用。这些发现支持向主动使用评分的转变,尽管需要在更大的多中心队列中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书