Predictive value of acute MRI-detected brain lesions for clinical outcome in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yangjuan Jia, Hui Guo, Xiaohui Liang, Ning Han, Yaxue Song, Jianguo Li, Quansheng Du
{"title":"Predictive value of acute MRI-detected brain lesions for clinical outcome in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning.","authors":"Yangjuan Jia, Hui Guo, Xiaohui Liang, Ning Han, Yaxue Song, Jianguo Li, Quansheng Du","doi":"10.1186/s40001-026-04127-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the predictive value of acute brain lesions (ABLs) for the clinical outcomes and delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study, patients with acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning were divided into the ABLs group and non-ABLs group. Outcome measures included clinical cure, favorable prognosis, and the incidence of DEACMP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes, and subgroup analyses were performed to clarify the impact of ABLs on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis showed that ABLs (clinical cure: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.75; DEACMP [DEACMP: aOR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-6.00) and time from onset to first hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) > 6 h (clinical cure: aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; DEACMP: aOR 3.50, 95% CI 1.58-7.74) were associated with a lower clinical cure rate and a higher incidence of DEACMP. A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 9 (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.33-16.89) was an independent predictor of DEACMP, but was not associated with clinical cure. Regarding ABLs in different locations, white matter lesions were significantly associated with lower clinical cure (adjusted OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.55), lower favorable outcome (adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.68), and higher DEACMP development (adjusted OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.59-6.32). In contrast, basal ganglia lesions were only significantly correlated with lower clinical cure (adjusted OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.96), but not significant with favorable outcome or DEACMP occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABLs and time from onset to first HBOT were significant predictors of clinical cure and DEACMP in patients. A GCS score < 9 was significantly associated with DEACMP but showed no definitive correlation with clinical cure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04127-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the predictive value of acute brain lesions (ABLs) for the clinical outcomes and delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, patients with acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning were divided into the ABLs group and non-ABLs group. Outcome measures included clinical cure, favorable prognosis, and the incidence of DEACMP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes, and subgroup analyses were performed to clarify the impact of ABLs on clinical outcomes.

Results: Multivariate analysis showed that ABLs (clinical cure: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.75; DEACMP [DEACMP: aOR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-6.00) and time from onset to first hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) > 6 h (clinical cure: aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; DEACMP: aOR 3.50, 95% CI 1.58-7.74) were associated with a lower clinical cure rate and a higher incidence of DEACMP. A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 9 (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.33-16.89) was an independent predictor of DEACMP, but was not associated with clinical cure. Regarding ABLs in different locations, white matter lesions were significantly associated with lower clinical cure (adjusted OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.55), lower favorable outcome (adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.68), and higher DEACMP development (adjusted OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.59-6.32). In contrast, basal ganglia lesions were only significantly correlated with lower clinical cure (adjusted OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.96), but not significant with favorable outcome or DEACMP occurrence.

Conclusion: ABLs and time from onset to first HBOT were significant predictors of clinical cure and DEACMP in patients. A GCS score < 9 was significantly associated with DEACMP but showed no definitive correlation with clinical cure.

急性mri检测脑病变对急性一氧化碳中毒患者临床预后的预测价值。
目的:探讨急性脑损伤(ABLs)对急性一氧化碳中毒(DEACMP)后临床预后和迟发性脑病的预测价值。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,将急性一氧化碳(CO)中毒患者分为ABLs组和非ABLs组。结果测量包括临床治愈、良好预后和DEACMP的发生率。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定临床结局的独立预测因素,并进行亚组分析以阐明ABLs对临床结局的影响。结果:多因素分析显示,ABLs(临床治愈:调整优势比[aOR] 0.35, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.17-0.75; DEACMP [DEACMP: aOR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-6.00)和发病至首次高压氧治疗(HBOT)时间bbbb6 h(临床治愈:aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; DEACMP: aOR 3.50, 95% CI 1.58-7.74)与较低的临床治愈率和较高的DEACMP发病率相关。结论:ABLs和从发病到第一次HBOT的时间是患者临床治愈和DEACMP的重要预测因素。GCS评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书