Consensus on evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia: findings from a European Delphi study with eye care professionals and payers.

IF 2.7 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wolf Lagreze, Paolo Nucci, Matthijs Versteegh, Caroline Klaver, Jesús Barrio-Barrio, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Rosario Gomez de Liaño, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad, Line Kessel, Jan Roelof Polling, Arnaud Sauer, Alexander K Schuster, Massimiliano Serafino, Edoardo Villani, Focke Ziemssen, Yvonne-Beatrice Boehler, Stefano Capri, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Joan-Antoni Valles Callol, Olivier Wong, Ting-Yen Chen, Christina Lymperopoulou, Ioanna Palaka, Yogesh Punekar, Dorothea von Bredow, Kun Shi-van Wielink
{"title":"Consensus on evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia: findings from a European Delphi study with eye care professionals and payers.","authors":"Wolf Lagreze, Paolo Nucci, Matthijs Versteegh, Caroline Klaver, Jesús Barrio-Barrio, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Rosario Gomez de Liaño, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad, Line Kessel, Jan Roelof Polling, Arnaud Sauer, Alexander K Schuster, Massimiliano Serafino, Edoardo Villani, Focke Ziemssen, Yvonne-Beatrice Boehler, Stefano Capri, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Joan-Antoni Valles Callol, Olivier Wong, Ting-Yen Chen, Christina Lymperopoulou, Ioanna Palaka, Yogesh Punekar, Dorothea von Bredow, Kun Shi-van Wielink","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Childhood myopia is a growing global concern, associated with significant burdens. This study aimed to identify evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia management through a European Delphi panel involving eye care professionals (ECPs) with expertise in childhood myopia management and payers (ie, individuals with experience in health technology assessment, healthcare funding, drug pricing and/or reimbursement decisions).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was employed, involving two rounds of online questionnaires followed by a final virtual workshop. The panel included 12 ECPs and 13 payers from seven European countries. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement among panellists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved on all 37 statements across six categories: disease background, clinical burden, psychosocial/humanistic burden, economic burden, treatment options and unmet needs. Key findings included recognition of ethnicity and age as crucial factors in evaluating childhood myopia, as well as the minimal clinically important difference for progression reduction. The panel emphasised the need for long-term studies on the efficacy and safety of myopia treatments, especially their impact on reducing future complications. The impact of high myopia on quality of life and economic burden was also highlighted. Regarding unmet needs, despite some known factors, the exact mechanisms behind myopia development remain unclear. There is a need for comprehensive epidemiological data on European childhood myopia and regulatory-approved pharmacological treatments in Europe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus was reached among European ECPs and payers on the evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia management. These findings can guide future research to establish the best strategies for childhood myopia management and mitigate the burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Childhood myopia is a growing global concern, associated with significant burdens. This study aimed to identify evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia management through a European Delphi panel involving eye care professionals (ECPs) with expertise in childhood myopia management and payers (ie, individuals with experience in health technology assessment, healthcare funding, drug pricing and/or reimbursement decisions).

Methods: A modified Delphi method was employed, involving two rounds of online questionnaires followed by a final virtual workshop. The panel included 12 ECPs and 13 payers from seven European countries. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement among panellists.

Results: Consensus was achieved on all 37 statements across six categories: disease background, clinical burden, psychosocial/humanistic burden, economic burden, treatment options and unmet needs. Key findings included recognition of ethnicity and age as crucial factors in evaluating childhood myopia, as well as the minimal clinically important difference for progression reduction. The panel emphasised the need for long-term studies on the efficacy and safety of myopia treatments, especially their impact on reducing future complications. The impact of high myopia on quality of life and economic burden was also highlighted. Regarding unmet needs, despite some known factors, the exact mechanisms behind myopia development remain unclear. There is a need for comprehensive epidemiological data on European childhood myopia and regulatory-approved pharmacological treatments in Europe.

Conclusions: Consensus was reached among European ECPs and payers on the evidence gaps and unmet needs in childhood myopia management. These findings can guide future research to establish the best strategies for childhood myopia management and mitigate the burden.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关于儿童近视证据差距和未满足需求的共识:来自欧洲眼科保健专业人员和支付者的德尔菲研究结果。
背景/目的:儿童近视是一个日益受到全球关注的问题,与重大负担相关。本研究旨在通过欧洲德尔菲小组,确定儿童近视管理方面的证据差距和未满足的需求,该小组包括具有儿童近视管理专业知识的眼科保健专业人员(ECPs)和支付方(即具有卫生技术评估、医疗保健资金、药品定价和/或报销决策经验的个人)。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法,包括两轮在线问卷调查和最后的虚拟研讨会。该小组包括来自7个欧洲国家的12家ECPs和13家付款人。共识定义为小组成员之间的共识≥70%。结果:对疾病背景、临床负担、社会心理/人文负担、经济负担、治疗方案和未满足需求等6类37项陈述达成共识。主要发现包括承认种族和年龄是评估儿童近视的关键因素,以及减少进展的最小临床重要差异。该小组强调需要对近视治疗的有效性和安全性进行长期研究,特别是对减少未来并发症的影响。高度近视对生活质量和经济负担的影响也得到了强调。至于未满足的需求,尽管有一些已知的因素,近视发展背后的确切机制仍不清楚。需要欧洲儿童近视的综合流行病学数据和欧洲监管部门批准的药物治疗。结论:欧洲ECPs和支付方就儿童近视管理的证据差距和未满足的需求达成了共识。这些发现可以指导未来的研究,以建立儿童近视管理的最佳策略,减轻负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书