Microbial bioleaching of rare earth elements from phosphate minerals: a biotechnology-driven systematic review of mechanisms, bioprocess determinants, and opportunities for sustainable recovery.

IF 4.8 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Sonali Prabodha Vijayarathna, Ileperumaarachchige Vayanga Nishani Rathnayake, Pradeep Wishwanath Samarasekere
{"title":"Microbial bioleaching of rare earth elements from phosphate minerals: a biotechnology-driven systematic review of mechanisms, bioprocess determinants, and opportunities for sustainable recovery.","authors":"Sonali Prabodha Vijayarathna, Ileperumaarachchige Vayanga Nishani Rathnayake, Pradeep Wishwanath Samarasekere","doi":"10.1186/s12896-026-01125-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising demand for rare earth elements (REEs) and the severe environmental impact of conventional extraction from phosphate minerals (monazite, apatite) have intensified the search for green alternatives. Microbial bioleaching offers a low-energy, low-waste, and a sustainable biotechnological alternative by exploiting the ability of fungi and bacteria to generate organic acids, siderophores, reducing agents, and other metabolites that solubilize REEs. Although interest in REE bioleaching has increased, a biotechnology-focused synthesis of microbial mechanisms, metabolic constraints, and process determinants specific to phosphate matrices remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar and other major databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies reporting microbial bioleaching of REEs from phosphate minerals. From 443 identified records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. These studies were evaluated based on microbial species, metabolic mechanisms, culture conditions, mineral substrates, and REE solubilization performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fungal species, particularly Aspergillus, Penicillium and Paecilomyces demonstrated the highest REE mobilization efficiencies through intensive production of citric, oxalic, and gluconic acids, along with phosphatase activity. Bacterial strains, including Acidithiobacillus, Bacillus, Pantoea, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella contributed complementary mechanisms such as proton extrusion, siderophore secretion, and Fe(III) / Fe(II) redox cycling. Bioleaching performance was strongly influenced by media composition, carbon source, nitrogen assimilation, pH evolution, mineralogy of the phosphate substrate, pulp density, and particle size. Across studies, the lack of standardized conditions limited direct comparability, but organic acid dominated pathways consistently produced the most robust REE solubilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbial bioleaching is a promising biotechnological platform for REE recovery from phosphate minerals, driven by metabolically diverse acidogenic, chelating, enzymatic, and redox mechanisms. However, advancements remain constrained by heterogeneous methodologies, limited integration of mechanistic studies, and minimal use of engineered strains or controlled bioreactor systems. Future progress requires standardized experimental frameworks, improved mechanistic understanding of organism-specific roles, and rational design of optimized microbial systems. This review offers a biotechnology-centered foundation to guide next-generation research on sustainable REE mobilization from phosphate resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":8905,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13064222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-026-01125-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rising demand for rare earth elements (REEs) and the severe environmental impact of conventional extraction from phosphate minerals (monazite, apatite) have intensified the search for green alternatives. Microbial bioleaching offers a low-energy, low-waste, and a sustainable biotechnological alternative by exploiting the ability of fungi and bacteria to generate organic acids, siderophores, reducing agents, and other metabolites that solubilize REEs. Although interest in REE bioleaching has increased, a biotechnology-focused synthesis of microbial mechanisms, metabolic constraints, and process determinants specific to phosphate matrices remains limited.

Methods: A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar and other major databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies reporting microbial bioleaching of REEs from phosphate minerals. From 443 identified records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. These studies were evaluated based on microbial species, metabolic mechanisms, culture conditions, mineral substrates, and REE solubilization performance.

Results: Fungal species, particularly Aspergillus, Penicillium and Paecilomyces demonstrated the highest REE mobilization efficiencies through intensive production of citric, oxalic, and gluconic acids, along with phosphatase activity. Bacterial strains, including Acidithiobacillus, Bacillus, Pantoea, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella contributed complementary mechanisms such as proton extrusion, siderophore secretion, and Fe(III) / Fe(II) redox cycling. Bioleaching performance was strongly influenced by media composition, carbon source, nitrogen assimilation, pH evolution, mineralogy of the phosphate substrate, pulp density, and particle size. Across studies, the lack of standardized conditions limited direct comparability, but organic acid dominated pathways consistently produced the most robust REE solubilization.

Conclusions: Microbial bioleaching is a promising biotechnological platform for REE recovery from phosphate minerals, driven by metabolically diverse acidogenic, chelating, enzymatic, and redox mechanisms. However, advancements remain constrained by heterogeneous methodologies, limited integration of mechanistic studies, and minimal use of engineered strains or controlled bioreactor systems. Future progress requires standardized experimental frameworks, improved mechanistic understanding of organism-specific roles, and rational design of optimized microbial systems. This review offers a biotechnology-centered foundation to guide next-generation research on sustainable REE mobilization from phosphate resources.

从磷矿物中微生物浸出稀土元素:生物技术驱动的机制、生物过程决定因素和可持续回收机会的系统综述。
背景:对稀土元素(ree)的需求不断增加,以及从磷酸盐矿物(独居石、磷灰石)中传统提取对环境的严重影响,加强了对绿色替代品的寻找。微生物浸出利用真菌和细菌产生有机酸、铁载体、还原剂和其他溶解稀土的代谢物的能力,提供了一种低能耗、低浪费和可持续的生物技术替代方案。尽管对稀土元素生物浸出的兴趣有所增加,但以生物技术为重点的微生物机制、代谢限制和磷酸盐基质特异性过程决定因素的合成仍然有限。方法:采用prisma引导的系统评价。我们检索了Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和b谷歌Scholar等主要数据库,以确定同行评议的关于微生物从磷矿物中浸出稀土元素的研究。从443个确定的记录中,25个研究在筛选和资格评估后符合纳入标准。这些研究基于微生物种类、代谢机制、培养条件、矿物基质和稀土增溶性能进行评估。结果:真菌物种,特别是曲霉、青霉和拟青霉,通过密集生产柠檬酸、草酸和葡萄糖酸,以及磷酸酶活性,显示出最高的稀土动员效率。包括酸性硫杆菌、芽孢杆菌、泛菌、伯克霍尔德氏菌、假单胞菌和克雷伯氏菌在内的细菌菌株提供了互补机制,如质子挤压、铁载体分泌和铁(III) /铁(II)氧化还原循环。浸出效果受培养基组成、碳源、氮同化、pH演化、磷酸盐基质矿物学、矿浆密度和粒度的强烈影响。在所有研究中,标准化条件的缺乏限制了直接的可比性,但有机酸主导的途径始终产生最强大的稀土增溶作用。结论:微生物浸出是一个很有前途的从磷矿物中回收稀土的生物技术平台,由代谢多样的致酸、螯合、酶和氧化还原机制驱动。然而,技术的进步仍然受到各种方法的限制,机械研究的有限整合,以及工程菌株或受控生物反应器系统的最小使用。未来的进展需要标准化的实验框架,提高对生物体特定作用的机制理解,以及优化微生物系统的合理设计。这一综述为指导下一代以生物技术为中心的从磷酸盐资源中可持续动员稀土元素的研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Biotechnology
BMC Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biotechnology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the manipulation of biological macromolecules or organisms for use in experimental procedures, cellular and tissue engineering or in the pharmaceutical, agricultural biotechnology and allied industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书