Conventional and Novel Approaches to Establishing Mouse Models of Gastric Cancer in the Past, Present, and Potential Post-H. Pylori Infection Era.

IF 4.9 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Hui Liu, Yunxiao Ge, Kangdong Liu, Zigang Dong
{"title":"Conventional and Novel Approaches to Establishing Mouse Models of Gastric Cancer in the Past, Present, and Potential Post-H. Pylori Infection Era.","authors":"Hui Liu, Yunxiao Ge, Kangdong Liu, Zigang Dong","doi":"10.1186/s12575-026-00333-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a major cause of global cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Mouse models are indispensable tools for preclinical research into its mechanisms and therapies. Although Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the primary risk factor for gastric cancer, developing mouse models based on this pathogen faces significant challenges. These include low bacterial colonization and survival rates, unpredictable and protracted tumorigenesis timelines, restrictions of host genetic backgrounds, the complexity of inflammatory and immune microenvironments, difficulties in standardized pathological assessment, and poor model reproducibility. In light of these limitations, research efforts have diversified into four principal categories of modeling approaches: chemical carcinogen-induced models, microbe-infected models (particularly those involving H. pylori), xenograft models, and genetically engineered mouse models. Each strategy offers distinct advantages and constraints, necessitating careful selection based on specific research objectives. This review comprehensively examines both conventional and emerging methods for establishing gastric cancer mouse models, situating them within a historical and evolving research landscape from past reliance on H. pylori to present and future approaches in the potential post-H. pylori infection era. We emphasize the applicability and compatibility of each modeling system with particular research goals, providing critical insights for selecting optimal in vivo platforms to advance the study of gastric carcinogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13067509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-026-00333-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a major cause of global cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Mouse models are indispensable tools for preclinical research into its mechanisms and therapies. Although Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the primary risk factor for gastric cancer, developing mouse models based on this pathogen faces significant challenges. These include low bacterial colonization and survival rates, unpredictable and protracted tumorigenesis timelines, restrictions of host genetic backgrounds, the complexity of inflammatory and immune microenvironments, difficulties in standardized pathological assessment, and poor model reproducibility. In light of these limitations, research efforts have diversified into four principal categories of modeling approaches: chemical carcinogen-induced models, microbe-infected models (particularly those involving H. pylori), xenograft models, and genetically engineered mouse models. Each strategy offers distinct advantages and constraints, necessitating careful selection based on specific research objectives. This review comprehensively examines both conventional and emerging methods for establishing gastric cancer mouse models, situating them within a historical and evolving research landscape from past reliance on H. pylori to present and future approaches in the potential post-H. pylori infection era. We emphasize the applicability and compatibility of each modeling system with particular research goals, providing critical insights for selecting optimal in vivo platforms to advance the study of gastric carcinogenesis.

建立小鼠胃癌模型的传统和新方法:过去、现在和潜在的h后。幽门螺杆菌感染时代。
胃癌仍然是全球癌症相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因。小鼠模型是临床前研究其机制和治疗方法不可缺少的工具。虽然幽门螺杆菌(h.p ylori)感染是胃癌的主要危险因素,但基于这种病原体建立小鼠模型面临着重大挑战。这些因素包括低细菌定植率和存活率,不可预测和持久的肿瘤发生时间表,宿主遗传背景的限制,炎症和免疫微环境的复杂性,标准化病理评估的困难以及模型可重复性差。鉴于这些局限性,研究工作已经多样化为四种主要的建模方法:化学致癌物诱导模型、微生物感染模型(特别是涉及幽门螺杆菌的模型)、异种移植模型和基因工程小鼠模型。每种策略都提供了不同的优势和限制,需要根据具体的研究目标进行仔细选择。本综述全面考察了建立胃癌小鼠模型的传统方法和新兴方法,将它们置于历史和不断发展的研究格局中,从过去依赖幽门螺杆菌到现在和未来潜在的后幽门螺杆菌的方法。幽门螺杆菌感染时代。我们强调每种建模系统与特定研究目标的适用性和兼容性,为选择最佳体内平台以推进胃癌发生研究提供关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书