Transdiagnostic neuropsychological factors in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and premenstrual syndrome: a comparison of the premenstrual and postmenstrual phases

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rezvan Torabi, Farzad Nasiri, Fateh Rahmani
{"title":"Transdiagnostic neuropsychological factors in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and premenstrual syndrome: a comparison of the premenstrual and postmenstrual phases","authors":"Rezvan Torabi,&nbsp;Farzad Nasiri,&nbsp;Fateh Rahmani","doi":"10.1007/s00737-026-01684-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to compare transdiagnostic neuropsychological factors among women with Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS), Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD), and asymptomatic control groups.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a causal-comparative design, 150 female university students aged 20 to 35 were selected through purposive sampling. Participants were categorized into PMS, PMDD, and asymptomatic control groups based on a structured clinical interview and a screening questionnaire. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), the Go/No-Go Task, and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences were observed among the three groups in sustained attention, inhibitory control, and risky decision-making. The PMDD group consistently showed lower performance than the PMS and asymptomatic control groups. Within-group phase comparisons revealed a significant decline in sustained attention only in the PMS group during the premenstrual phase, while other cognitive functions remained stable across menstrual cycle phases. No significant menstrual cycle phase changes were observed in the PMDD or asymptomatic control groups.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings indicate that women with PMDD and PMS exhibit difficulties in attention, inhibitory control, and decision-making compared to the asymptomatic control group. Such difficulties appear to be related to symptom burden, highlighting potential targets for assessment and intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00737-026-01684-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare transdiagnostic neuropsychological factors among women with Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS), Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD), and asymptomatic control groups.

Methods

Using a causal-comparative design, 150 female university students aged 20 to 35 were selected through purposive sampling. Participants were categorized into PMS, PMDD, and asymptomatic control groups based on a structured clinical interview and a screening questionnaire. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), the Go/No-Go Task, and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).

Results

Significant differences were observed among the three groups in sustained attention, inhibitory control, and risky decision-making. The PMDD group consistently showed lower performance than the PMS and asymptomatic control groups. Within-group phase comparisons revealed a significant decline in sustained attention only in the PMS group during the premenstrual phase, while other cognitive functions remained stable across menstrual cycle phases. No significant menstrual cycle phase changes were observed in the PMDD or asymptomatic control groups.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that women with PMDD and PMS exhibit difficulties in attention, inhibitory control, and decision-making compared to the asymptomatic control group. Such difficulties appear to be related to symptom burden, highlighting potential targets for assessment and intervention.

经前焦虑症和经前综合征的经前和经后期的比较:经前和经后期的神经心理因素。
目的:本研究旨在比较经前综合征(PMS)、经前烦躁不安症(PMDD)和无症状对照组女性的跨诊断神经心理因素。方法:采用因果比较设计,采用有目的抽样法,抽取年龄在20 ~ 35岁的女大学生150名。根据结构化的临床访谈和筛选问卷,参与者被分为经前症候群、经前不悦症和无症状对照组。神经认知功能通过连续表现测试(CPT)、Go/No-Go任务和爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)进行评估。结果:三组在持续注意、抑制控制和风险决策方面存在显著差异。经前抑郁症组的表现始终低于经前综合症组和无症状对照组。组内阶段比较显示,只有经前综合症组的持续注意力显著下降,而其他认知功能在月经周期各阶段保持稳定。经前不悦症或无症状对照组未观察到明显的月经周期变化。结论:这些研究结果表明,与无症状对照组相比,患有经前不悦症和经前综合症的女性在注意力、抑制控制和决策方面表现出困难。这些困难似乎与症状负担有关,突出了评估和干预的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Archives of Women's Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Women’s Mental Health is the official journal of the International Association for Women''s Mental Health, Marcé Society and the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology (NASPOG). The exchange of knowledge between psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists is one of the major aims of the journal. Its international scope includes psychodynamics, social and biological aspects of all psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in women. The editors especially welcome interdisciplinary studies, focussing on the interface between psychiatry, psychosomatics, obstetrics and gynecology. Archives of Women’s Mental Health publishes rigorously reviewed research papers, short communications, case reports, review articles, invited editorials, historical perspectives, book reviews, letters to the editor, as well as conference abstracts. Only contributions written in English will be accepted. The journal assists clinicians, teachers and researchers to incorporate knowledge of all aspects of women’s mental health into current and future clinical care and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书