The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Fakher Rahim, Shamim Gozin
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Fakher Rahim, Shamim Gozin","doi":"10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2025059978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multitude of studies have investigated the identification of unique antigens and genetic traits associated with cardiac stem cells (CSCs) since their discovery. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac stem cells (CSCs), elucidate existing knowledge regarding their potential applications, and compare them with other novel therapeutic strategies for cardiac repair, including bone marrow cells (BMCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Researchers conducted a search of important indexing databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, and Embase, to identify pertinent papers published from 1980 to January 2025. A total of 74 studies involving 5,420 participants were selected from 459 evaluated for the study. A total of 2,931 participants were allocated to the intervention group, whereas 2,489 were assigned to the placebo or control groups. The research encompassed 49 papers on BMC therapy, 17 on MSC therapy, five on CSC therapy, and three on ADRC therapy. A 0.4% enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.57; I2: 85%, P < 0.00001] was noted after stem cell therapy and in the stem cell therapy cohort, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) diminished by -0.33 mL (95% CI: -0.47 to -0.19; I2: 73%, P < 0.00001), whereas left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduced by -0.18 mL (95% CI: -0.31 to -0.05; I2: 68%, P = 0.006). Furthermore, in this cohort, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) exhibited an increase of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.34; I2: 0%, P = 0.005), whereas the standardized mean difference of infarct size (IS) demonstrated a reduction of -0.36% (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12; I2: 68%; P = 0.004). These findings augment the existing evidence and underscore the transformative potential of stem cell therapy in cardiac treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94308,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in biomedical engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"97-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2025059978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A multitude of studies have investigated the identification of unique antigens and genetic traits associated with cardiac stem cells (CSCs) since their discovery. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac stem cells (CSCs), elucidate existing knowledge regarding their potential applications, and compare them with other novel therapeutic strategies for cardiac repair, including bone marrow cells (BMCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Researchers conducted a search of important indexing databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, and Embase, to identify pertinent papers published from 1980 to January 2025. A total of 74 studies involving 5,420 participants were selected from 459 evaluated for the study. A total of 2,931 participants were allocated to the intervention group, whereas 2,489 were assigned to the placebo or control groups. The research encompassed 49 papers on BMC therapy, 17 on MSC therapy, five on CSC therapy, and three on ADRC therapy. A 0.4% enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.57; I2: 85%, P < 0.00001] was noted after stem cell therapy and in the stem cell therapy cohort, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) diminished by -0.33 mL (95% CI: -0.47 to -0.19; I2: 73%, P < 0.00001), whereas left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduced by -0.18 mL (95% CI: -0.31 to -0.05; I2: 68%, P = 0.006). Furthermore, in this cohort, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) exhibited an increase of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.34; I2: 0%, P = 0.005), whereas the standardized mean difference of infarct size (IS) demonstrated a reduction of -0.36% (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12; I2: 68%; P = 0.004). These findings augment the existing evidence and underscore the transformative potential of stem cell therapy in cardiac treatment.

心脏干细胞治疗心血管疾病的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
自心脏干细胞(CSCs)被发现以来,大量的研究调查了与心脏干细胞相关的独特抗原和遗传特征的鉴定。本荟萃分析旨在评估心脏干细胞(CSCs)的安全性和有效性,阐明其潜在应用的现有知识,并将其与其他新的心脏修复治疗策略进行比较,包括骨髓细胞(BMCs)和间充质干细胞(MSCs)。研究人员检索了重要的索引数据库,包括PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Central、Web of Science (WOS)、CINAHL和Embase,以确定1980年至2025年1月发表的相关论文。共有74项研究,涉及5420名参与者,从459项评估研究中选出。共有2931名参与者被分配到干预组,而2489名参与者被分配到安慰剂组或对照组。该研究包括49篇BMC治疗论文、17篇MSC治疗论文、5篇CSC治疗论文和3篇ADRC治疗论文。左室射血分数(LVEF)增加0.4%[95%可信区间(95% CI): 0.23-0.57;I2: 85%, P < 0.00001]在干细胞治疗后发现,在干细胞治疗队列中,左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)减少了-0.33 mL (95% CI: -0.47至-0.19;I2: 73%, P < 0.00001),而左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)减少了-0.18 mL (95% CI: -0.31至-0.05;I2: 68%, P = 0.006)。此外,在该队列中,6分钟步行试验(6MWT)增加了0.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.34; I2: 0%, P = 0.005),而梗死面积的标准化平均差异(IS)减少了-0.36% (95% CI: -0.60至-0.12;I2: 68%; P = 0.004)。这些发现增强了现有的证据,强调了干细胞治疗在心脏治疗中的变革性潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书