Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado's largest health system: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.8 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Brock J Gilsdorf, Laura J Helmkamp, Robert L Page, Larry A Allen, Colleen K McIlvennan
{"title":"Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado's largest health system: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Brock J Gilsdorf, Laura J Helmkamp, Robert L Page, Larry A Allen, Colleen K McIlvennan","doi":"10.1186/s42238-026-00418-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Colorado was the first state in the United States to legalize recreational cannabis, which provides a unique opportunity to evaluate cannabis urine drug screen (UDS) testing trends in a large healthcare system in response to that policy. This study examined how testing rates and positivity evolved over time and whether testing patterns varied by demographic factors. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data. We assessed group comparisons with Chi-squared tests and t-tests and demographic predictors of UDS testing using multivariable log binomial models. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2022, the positivity rate for cannabis among UDSs rose from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015, then plateaued. The proportion of visits with cannabis testing declined from 0.25% to 0.04%. Younger patients, males, and individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian were more likely to be tested than their counterparts, with notable racial and ethnic disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite rising cannabis positivity rates, testing frequency declined. Persistent demographic disparities in testing raise concerns about potential bias, especially in the absence of documented differences in use across groups. Future work should examine indications for cannabis urine drug screen testing and how results influence clinical care. </p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00418-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorado was the first state in the United States to legalize recreational cannabis, which provides a unique opportunity to evaluate cannabis urine drug screen (UDS) testing trends in a large healthcare system in response to that policy. This study examined how testing rates and positivity evolved over time and whether testing patterns varied by demographic factors. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data. We assessed group comparisons with Chi-squared tests and t-tests and demographic predictors of UDS testing using multivariable log binomial models. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2022, the positivity rate for cannabis among UDSs rose from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015, then plateaued. The proportion of visits with cannabis testing declined from 0.25% to 0.04%. Younger patients, males, and individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian were more likely to be tested than their counterparts, with notable racial and ethnic disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite rising cannabis positivity rates, testing frequency declined. Persistent demographic disparities in testing raise concerns about potential bias, especially in the absence of documented differences in use across groups. Future work should examine indications for cannabis urine drug screen testing and how results influence clinical care.

科罗拉多州最大的卫生系统大麻尿液药物筛选测试趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:科罗拉多州是美国第一个将娱乐性大麻合法化的州,这为评估大型医疗保健系统中大麻尿液药物筛查(UDS)测试趋势提供了独特的机会,以响应该政策。这项研究调查了检测率和阳性是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,以及检测模式是否因人口因素而变化。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用电子病历数据分析了2008年至2022年科罗拉多大学健康中心的所有就诊情况。我们使用卡方检验和t检验评估组间比较,使用多变量对数二项模型评估UDS检测的人口统计学预测因子。结果:从2008年到2022年,uds中大麻的阳性率从2008年的14%上升到2015年的30%,然后趋于平稳。接受大麻检测的就诊比例从0.25%降至0.04%。年轻患者、男性和黑人、西班牙裔或美洲印第安人比他们的同行更有可能接受检测,存在明显的种族和民族差异。结论:尽管大麻阳性率上升,但检测频率下降。检测中持续存在的人口统计学差异引起了对潜在偏倚的担忧,特别是在没有记录跨群体使用差异的情况下。未来的工作应检查大麻尿药物筛选试验的适应症以及结果如何影响临床护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书