Comparison of renal function parameters and acute kidney injury incidence between vancomycin monotherapy and vancomycin-fosfomycin combination therapy in patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lan Chen, Xiaoqing Huang, Yaqian Yan, Dandan Wang, Guoping Liu, Shuwen Huang, Qingqing Li, Bin Yang, Yue Qiu
{"title":"Comparison of renal function parameters and acute kidney injury incidence between vancomycin monotherapy and vancomycin-fosfomycin combination therapy in patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Lan Chen, Xiaoqing Huang, Yaqian Yan, Dandan Wang, Guoping Liu, Shuwen Huang, Qingqing Li, Bin Yang, Yue Qiu","doi":"10.1007/s44446-026-00065-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vancomycin (VAN) is a first-line agent for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but it poses nephrotoxicity risks. While VAN-fosfomycin (FOS) combination shows synergistic efficacy and lower mutant prevention concentrations, its renoprotective effects compared to VAN alone remain unclear. This study aims to directly compare renal function parameters and acute kidney injury incidence between VAN monotherapy and VAN + FOS combination therapy. After propensity score matching of the initial 156 patients, 76 individuals were included in the final analysis; 38 were assigned to the vancomycin monotherapy group and 38 in the VAN + FOS combination group. Renal function parameters were recorded at 48 h and 72 h post-treatment, and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was compared between the two groups. Univariate analyses were performed to identify baseline factors associated with AKI. The VAN + FOS group had a significantly lower incidence of AKI compared to the VAN-alone group (5.26% vs. 21.05%, P = 0.04). Due to the limited number of AKI cases, multivariate adjustment was not possible. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between AKI incidence and FOS combination therapy, age, and vancomycin trough concentration (P = 0.04, P = 0.00, and P = 0.02, respectively). These findings warrant validation in larger, prospective studies. Fosfomycin adjunct therapy was associated with a lower incidence of vancomycin-induced AKI. However, these associations should be interpreted cautiously and require validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12957692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44446-026-00065-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vancomycin (VAN) is a first-line agent for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but it poses nephrotoxicity risks. While VAN-fosfomycin (FOS) combination shows synergistic efficacy and lower mutant prevention concentrations, its renoprotective effects compared to VAN alone remain unclear. This study aims to directly compare renal function parameters and acute kidney injury incidence between VAN monotherapy and VAN + FOS combination therapy. After propensity score matching of the initial 156 patients, 76 individuals were included in the final analysis; 38 were assigned to the vancomycin monotherapy group and 38 in the VAN + FOS combination group. Renal function parameters were recorded at 48 h and 72 h post-treatment, and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was compared between the two groups. Univariate analyses were performed to identify baseline factors associated with AKI. The VAN + FOS group had a significantly lower incidence of AKI compared to the VAN-alone group (5.26% vs. 21.05%, P = 0.04). Due to the limited number of AKI cases, multivariate adjustment was not possible. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between AKI incidence and FOS combination therapy, age, and vancomycin trough concentration (P = 0.04, P = 0.00, and P = 0.02, respectively). These findings warrant validation in larger, prospective studies. Fosfomycin adjunct therapy was associated with a lower incidence of vancomycin-induced AKI. However, these associations should be interpreted cautiously and require validation in larger cohorts.

万古霉素单药和万古霉素-磷霉素联合治疗患者肾功能参数和急性肾损伤发生率的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
万古霉素(VAN)是治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的一线药物,但它存在肾毒性风险。虽然VAN- fofoomycin (FOS)联合用药显示出协同效应和较低的突变预防浓度,但与单独使用VAN相比,其对肾脏的保护作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在直接比较VAN单药和VAN + FOS联合治疗的肾功能参数和急性肾损伤发生率。在对最初的156例患者进行倾向评分匹配后,76人被纳入最终分析;万古霉素单药组38例,VAN + FOS联合组38例。记录治疗后48 h、72 h肾功能参数,比较两组急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率。进行单变量分析以确定与AKI相关的基线因素。VAN + FOS组AKI发生率明显低于单独VAN组(5.26% vs. 21.05%, P = 0.04)。由于AKI病例数量有限,不可能进行多因素调整。单因素分析显示,AKI发病率与FOS联合治疗、年龄和万古霉素谷浓度有显著相关性(P = 0.04, P = 0.00和P = 0.02)。这些发现值得在更大规模的前瞻性研究中得到验证。磷霉素辅助治疗与万古霉素诱导的AKI发生率较低相关。然而,这些关联应谨慎解释,并需要在更大的队列中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书