Flexibility on a Firm Foundation-The Central Electricity Generating Board's Promotion of Nuclear Power in Oldbury-on-Severn.

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
NTM Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1007/s00048-026-00445-9
Christian Götter
{"title":"Flexibility on a Firm Foundation-The Central Electricity Generating Board's Promotion of Nuclear Power in Oldbury-on-Severn.","authors":"Christian Götter","doi":"10.1007/s00048-026-00445-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In March 1959, the small parish of Oldbury-on-Severn in Gloucestershire was singled out to become the site of one of the last reactors in the United Kingdom's first \"generation\" of atomic power plants. The initial reception was ambiguous. Local people feared the loss of land, of traditional fishing rights in the nearby River Severn, and radioactive fallout. In unison, the parish council rejected the project, but accepted that the majority of Thornbury Rural District, to which it belonged, welcomed it as something that was in the national interest, was deemed safe by experts, and was a source of pride. In May, an exhibition on nuclear energy was opened in Thornbury to convince local people of the technology's benefits. It was a first step in a long row of measures taken to argue for the power station and its positive contribution to the area. This paper demonstrates that the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) and with it, the British state, as an early adopter of nuclear power, never ceased to fight for the technology's acceptance, but faced challenges ranging from initial local skepticism to transnational catastrophes such as Chernobyl. In doing so, the CEGB resorted to a variety of measures, from the initial exhibition to large open days, and profited from institutionalized ones, namely public inquiries and a \"Local Liaison Committee\" functioning as a hinge between the power plant and its neighborhood. The paper thereby uncovers the often mundane practices by which technology acceptance was produced and maintained on the ground.</p>","PeriodicalId":43143,"journal":{"name":"NTM","volume":" ","pages":"139-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13249664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NTM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-026-00445-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In March 1959, the small parish of Oldbury-on-Severn in Gloucestershire was singled out to become the site of one of the last reactors in the United Kingdom's first "generation" of atomic power plants. The initial reception was ambiguous. Local people feared the loss of land, of traditional fishing rights in the nearby River Severn, and radioactive fallout. In unison, the parish council rejected the project, but accepted that the majority of Thornbury Rural District, to which it belonged, welcomed it as something that was in the national interest, was deemed safe by experts, and was a source of pride. In May, an exhibition on nuclear energy was opened in Thornbury to convince local people of the technology's benefits. It was a first step in a long row of measures taken to argue for the power station and its positive contribution to the area. This paper demonstrates that the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) and with it, the British state, as an early adopter of nuclear power, never ceased to fight for the technology's acceptance, but faced challenges ranging from initial local skepticism to transnational catastrophes such as Chernobyl. In doing so, the CEGB resorted to a variety of measures, from the initial exhibition to large open days, and profited from institutionalized ones, namely public inquiries and a "Local Liaison Committee" functioning as a hinge between the power plant and its neighborhood. The paper thereby uncovers the often mundane practices by which technology acceptance was produced and maintained on the ground.

坚实基础上的灵活性——中央发电委员会在塞文河畔奥尔德伯里推广核电。
1959年3月,格洛斯特郡(Gloucestershire)塞文河畔奥尔德伯里(Oldbury-on-Severn)的一个小教区被挑选出来,成为英国首批“一代”核电站最后一批反应堆之一的所在地。最初的反应是模棱两可的。当地居民担心会失去土地,失去附近塞文河的传统捕鱼权,以及放射性沉降物。教区委员会一致拒绝了这个项目,但接受了它所属的索恩伯里农村区的大多数人的欢迎,因为这符合国家利益,专家认为这是安全的,而且是值得骄傲的事情。今年5月,一场关于核能的展览在索恩伯里开幕,目的是让当地人相信这项技术的好处。这是为支持该电站及其对该地区的积极贡献而采取的一系列措施中的第一步。本文表明,作为核能的早期采用者,英国中央发电委员会(CEGB)及其政府从未停止为这项技术的接受而斗争,但面临着从最初的当地怀疑到切尔诺贝利等跨国灾难的挑战。为此,中电局采取了各种措施,从最初的展览到大型开放日,并从制度化的措施中获益,即公众咨询和“地方联络委员会”,作为发电厂与社区之间的纽带。因此,本文揭示了技术接受产生和维持在地面上的通常平凡的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NTM
NTM HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: NTM ist die größte Zeitschrift für Wissenschafts-, Technik- und Medizingeschichte im deutschen Sprachraum. Sie bietet ein internationales Forum für Forschungsbeiträge, Debatten und Rezensionen aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Wissenschafts-, Technik- und Medizingeschichte in allen Epochen und unterschiedlichen Regionen. Wir veröffentlichen innovative Beiträge, die an neuere theoretische und methodische Ansätze und Debatten anknüpfen, neues empirisches Material erschließen oder neue Forschungsfelder eröffnen. Neben der Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, der Technik und der Medizin sind auch Beiträge zur Geschichte der Geistes-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften willkommen. NTM erscheint vierteljährlich. Neben dem klassischen, individuellen Forschungsartikel und Buchrezensionen publiziert NTM als weitere Textgattungen das „Forum“, das „Fundstück“ sowie “Essay Reviews”: - Provokative oder auch kontroverse Beiträge stoßen im Forum Debatten und Fragen an, die unser Feld kommend prägen werden. - Das Fundstück erschließt vergessene Objekt-, Bild- oder Schriftquellen von hoher historischer Relevanz. - Essay Reviews bieten entlang von Literaturbesprechungen einen kritischen Überblick über ein entstehendes Forschungsfeld. - Außerdem erscheinen Themenhefte (4-6 Artikel) sowie Special Sections (3-4 Artikel), die ein neues Forschungsfeld abstecken bzw. dessen Potential exemplarisch aufzeigen. NTM wird seit 2018 von der Gesellschaft für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, der Medizin, und der Technik (GWMT) herausgegeben (www.gwmt.de). Zuvor war NTM das wissenschaftliche Organ der DGGMNT (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft en und Technik e. V.). Die Zeitschrift hat eine lange Tradition und wurde 1960 von Gerhard Harig und Alexander Mette in Leipzig gegründet. • Doppelt anonymes Begutachtungsverfahren • Mischung aus unterschiedlichen Textgattungen (Artikel, Fundstück, Forum, Essay Reviews, Rezensionen) • Publikationssprachen: Deutsch, Englisch und Französisch • Volltext-Zugriff fu¨r alle Institutionen des DEAL Konsortiums ab 2020. Weitere Informationen zu DEAL unter https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements/oaforgermany-de NTM is the largest and most comprehensive journal for history of science, technology, and medicine in the German-speaking world. It offers an international forum for research articles, debates and reviews in the entire field of history of science, technology, and medicine in all epochs and various regions. The journal focuses on innovative theoretical and methodological approaches and discussions which make new empirical material or areas of research accessible. Contributions to the history of science, technology, and medicine, but also to the history of the social sciences and the humanities are welcome. NTM appears four times a year. Aside from classic individual research articles and book reviews, NTM publishes as additional text genres the “Forum”, the “Lost & Found”, and also “Essay Reviews”: - In the Forum, provocative or controversial contributions encourage debates and questions, that are set to shape the future of our field. - Lost & Found aims at exploring forgotten objects and other sources of great historical relevance. - Essay Reviews provide a critical overview of emerging research fields along literature reviews. - Moreover, NTM publishes Special Issues (4 – 6 articles) as well as Special Sections (3-4 articles), are aiming at defining new research fields or demonstrating their potential. NTM has been published under the auspices of the „Gesellschaft für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, der Medizin, und der Technik (GWMT)”, (www.gwmt.de) since 2008. Before, NTM used to be the scientific body of the DGGMNT (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft en und Technik e. V.). The journal has a long tradition and was founded in 1960 by Gerhard Harig and Alexander Mette in Leipzig. • Double-blind peer review process • Mixture of different text genres (articles, lost & found, forum, essay reviews, reviews) • Papers are accepted for publication in German, English, and French • Open access to the full-text version under country-specific conditions Bibliographie N.T.M. Zuerst erschienen 1960 / first published in 1960 Namensänderung ab 1.1.2008 / renamed in 2008 1 Volumen pro Jahr, 4 Hefte pro Volumen / 1 vol. per year, 4 issues per volume ca. 500 Seiten pro Volumen / 500 pages per volume Format: 15.5 x 23.5 cm ISSN 0036-6978 (print) ISSN 1420-9144 (electronic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书