Lived experiences of ethical dilemmas in pricing life-saving medicines among private-sector pharmacists in Zimbabwe.

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Daniel Sibanda
{"title":"Lived experiences of ethical dilemmas in pricing life-saving medicines among private-sector pharmacists in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Daniel Sibanda","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Access to affordable medicines is central to primary health care and universal health coverage. In Zimbabwe, the absence of national price regulation and heavy out-of-pocket expenditure place private-sector pharmacists at the centre of difficult decisions, as they balance professional duty with business survival.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by pharmacists in Zimbabwe's private sector when pricing life-saving medicines and the coping mechanisms and support systems they employ.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The study was conducted in private community pharmacies located in Harare and Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's two largest urban pharmaceutical markets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 pharmacists (6 Harare, 6 Bulawayo) who were purposively sampled from independent and chain pharmacies. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. NVivo supported coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Pharmacists described moral distress when patients could not afford medicines, particularly insulin and antihypertensives. Informal coping strategies included silent discounts, partial dispensing, referrals, and credit sales. Harare participants emphasised currency volatility and chain-store policies, whereas Bulawayo pharmacists highlighted community solidarity. All called for systemic support through ethical pricing guidelines, subsidy mechanisms, and professional forums.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Ethical dilemmas in pricing are pervasive. Coping strategies provide temporary relief but are unsustainable and may compromise care. Systemic reforms are required to balance affordability with sustainable pharmacy practice.Contribution: This study highlights the moral dimension of medicine pricing in Zimbabwe and provides evidence to guide ethical frameworks, regulatory reforms, and professional support for equitable access to medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Access to affordable medicines is central to primary health care and universal health coverage. In Zimbabwe, the absence of national price regulation and heavy out-of-pocket expenditure place private-sector pharmacists at the centre of difficult decisions, as they balance professional duty with business survival.

Aim:  This study aimed to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by pharmacists in Zimbabwe's private sector when pricing life-saving medicines and the coping mechanisms and support systems they employ.

Setting:  The study was conducted in private community pharmacies located in Harare and Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's two largest urban pharmaceutical markets.

Methods:  A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 pharmacists (6 Harare, 6 Bulawayo) who were purposively sampled from independent and chain pharmacies. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. NVivo supported coding.

Results:  Pharmacists described moral distress when patients could not afford medicines, particularly insulin and antihypertensives. Informal coping strategies included silent discounts, partial dispensing, referrals, and credit sales. Harare participants emphasised currency volatility and chain-store policies, whereas Bulawayo pharmacists highlighted community solidarity. All called for systemic support through ethical pricing guidelines, subsidy mechanisms, and professional forums.

Conclusion:  Ethical dilemmas in pricing are pervasive. Coping strategies provide temporary relief but are unsustainable and may compromise care. Systemic reforms are required to balance affordability with sustainable pharmacy practice.Contribution: This study highlights the moral dimension of medicine pricing in Zimbabwe and provides evidence to guide ethical frameworks, regulatory reforms, and professional support for equitable access to medicines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

津巴布韦私营部门药剂师在为救命药品定价时面临的道德困境的亲身经历。
背景:获得负担得起的药品是初级卫生保健和全民健康覆盖的核心。在津巴布韦,由于缺乏国家价格管制和高额自付费用,私营部门药剂师在平衡专业职责与企业生存之间的关系时,处于艰难决策的中心。目的:本研究旨在探讨津巴布韦私营部门药剂师在为救命药品定价时面临的伦理困境,以及他们采用的应对机制和支持系统。环境:这项研究是在津巴布韦两个最大的城市药品市场哈拉雷和布拉瓦约的私人社区药店进行的。方法:采用定性解释现象学设计。对12名药剂师(哈拉雷6名,布拉瓦约6名)进行了半结构化访谈,这些药剂师有意从独立和连锁药店中抽取样本。采访被记录下来,逐字抄写,并使用布劳恩和克拉克的六阶段框架进行主题分析。NVivo支持编码。结果:药剂师描述了当病人买不起药,特别是胰岛素和抗高血压药时的道德困境。非正式的应对策略包括无声折扣、部分分配、推荐和赊销。哈拉雷的参与者强调了货币波动和连锁店政策,而布拉瓦约的药剂师强调了社区团结。所有人都呼吁通过道德定价指南、补贴机制和专业论坛提供系统支持。结论:定价中的伦理困境普遍存在。应对策略提供了暂时的缓解,但是不可持续的,可能会损害护理。需要进行系统改革,以平衡可负担性与可持续的药房实践。贡献:本研究突出了津巴布韦药品定价的道德层面,并为指导伦理框架、监管改革和公平获取药品的专业支持提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书