Matheus Santos Cordeiro, Luana Lara Rocha, Bruna Aparecida Avelar, Alex de Oliveira Camara, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de Oliveira, Mariana Carvalho de Menezes
{"title":"Do sustainable diets take food processing into account? A scoping review.","authors":"Matheus Santos Cordeiro, Luana Lara Rocha, Bruna Aparecida Avelar, Alex de Oliveira Camara, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de Oliveira, Mariana Carvalho de Menezes","doi":"10.1017/S1368980026102237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine how food processing is addressed within indices/tools used to assess healthy and sustainable diets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR protocol. Peer-reviewed studies developing or applying indices/tools for assessing sustainable diets were included. Two independent reviewers performed the selection, with disagreements resolved by discussion, and, when necessary, a third reviewer was consulted to reach a consensus.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The review included studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, without time restrictions and indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO databases.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of fifty-seven studies about sustainable diets were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studies showed significant gaps in addressing food processing and other food system components when assessing sustainable diets. The majority of studies were conducted in recent years and primarily in high-income countries, and while environmental and health dimensions of sustainability are widely explored, economic and sociocultural dimensions remain underrepresented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment of diet sustainability remains incomplete without accounting for the role of food processing and the broader food system. There is a need for comprehensive methodologies that integrate all sustainability dimensions while also considering local contexts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13087983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980026102237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine how food processing is addressed within indices/tools used to assess healthy and sustainable diets.
Design: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR protocol. Peer-reviewed studies developing or applying indices/tools for assessing sustainable diets were included. Two independent reviewers performed the selection, with disagreements resolved by discussion, and, when necessary, a third reviewer was consulted to reach a consensus.
Setting: The review included studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, without time restrictions and indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO databases.
Participants: A total of fifty-seven studies about sustainable diets were analysed.
Results: Most studies showed significant gaps in addressing food processing and other food system components when assessing sustainable diets. The majority of studies were conducted in recent years and primarily in high-income countries, and while environmental and health dimensions of sustainability are widely explored, economic and sociocultural dimensions remain underrepresented.
Conclusions: The assessment of diet sustainability remains incomplete without accounting for the role of food processing and the broader food system. There is a need for comprehensive methodologies that integrate all sustainability dimensions while also considering local contexts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
目的:本研究旨在研究如何在用于评估健康和可持续饮食的指数/工具中解决食品加工问题。设计:按照PRISMA-ScR方案进行范围审查。包括开发或应用评估可持续饮食的指数/工具的同行评议研究。两名独立的审稿人进行选择,通过讨论解决分歧,必要时咨询第三名审稿人以达成共识。环境:该综述包括以英语、葡萄牙语或西班牙语发表的研究,没有时间限制,并在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和SciELO数据库中检索。参与者:总共分析了57项关于可持续饮食的研究。结果:大多数研究表明,在评估可持续饮食时,在解决食品加工和其他食品系统组成部分方面存在重大差距。大多数研究是近年来进行的,主要是在高收入国家进行的,虽然对可持续性的环境和健康方面进行了广泛探讨,但对经济和社会文化方面的研究仍然不足。结论:如果不考虑食品加工和更广泛的食品系统的作用,对饮食可持续性的评估仍然是不完整的。需要综合所有可持续性方面的综合方法,同时也考虑到当地情况,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。
期刊介绍:
Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.