Comparative assessment of spherical and cylindrical ionization chambers (PTW 32002 and PTW 23361) in 60Co and 137Cs reference beams: experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation for installation compliance in gamma irradiator.

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Taibi Zidouz, Asmaa Mouhssine, Hasbiya Tamiss, Abdessamad Didi, Abdellatif Talbi, Khalid Nabaoui, Elmehdi Alibrahmi, El Mahjoub Chakir, Abdelwahab Badague, Mohamed Zaryah
{"title":"Comparative assessment of spherical and cylindrical ionization chambers (PTW 32002 and PTW 23361) in 60Co and 137Cs reference beams: experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation for installation compliance in gamma irradiator.","authors":"Taibi Zidouz, Asmaa Mouhssine, Hasbiya Tamiss, Abdessamad Didi, Abdellatif Talbi, Khalid Nabaoui, Elmehdi Alibrahmi, El Mahjoub Chakir, Abdelwahab Badague, Mohamed Zaryah","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncag014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accredited calibration laboratories operating under ISO/IEC 17025 must demonstrate compliance of their facilities with technical standards such as ISO 4037 when performing calibrations in gamma and X-ray fields, typically using ionization chambers as reference instruments. In this framework, the accurate determination of the air-kerma rate is a critical step to ensure both calibration reliability and international traceability in radiation protection dosimetry. This study reports a comparative evaluation of two ionization chambers with different geometries: the PTW 32002 (spherical, 1 L) and the PTW 23361 (cylindrical, 30 cm3). Both were employed to characterize 137Cs and 60Co reference radiation fields at the CNESTEN calibration laboratory. The experimental results were compared against a theoretical benchmark provided by Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP6.1 code to perform a comparative study with the measured values. The aim was to verify the installation's compliance with the inverse square law and to assess the metrological suitability of the two detectors. The results showed overall agreement between experiment and simulation, with deviations ranging from ~0.2% to 10.5%, depending on photon energy and source-to-detector distance. The spherical PTW 32002 chamber demonstrated greater stability in 60Co beams, while the cylindrical PTW 23361 exhibited better accuracy in 137Cs fields. These findings highlight the importance of chamber selection with respect to photon energy and dose rate, and confirm the compliance of the CNESTEN facility with international standards, thereby supporting reduced uncertainties and improved metrological traceability in calibration services.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":"827-841"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncag014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accredited calibration laboratories operating under ISO/IEC 17025 must demonstrate compliance of their facilities with technical standards such as ISO 4037 when performing calibrations in gamma and X-ray fields, typically using ionization chambers as reference instruments. In this framework, the accurate determination of the air-kerma rate is a critical step to ensure both calibration reliability and international traceability in radiation protection dosimetry. This study reports a comparative evaluation of two ionization chambers with different geometries: the PTW 32002 (spherical, 1 L) and the PTW 23361 (cylindrical, 30 cm3). Both were employed to characterize 137Cs and 60Co reference radiation fields at the CNESTEN calibration laboratory. The experimental results were compared against a theoretical benchmark provided by Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP6.1 code to perform a comparative study with the measured values. The aim was to verify the installation's compliance with the inverse square law and to assess the metrological suitability of the two detectors. The results showed overall agreement between experiment and simulation, with deviations ranging from ~0.2% to 10.5%, depending on photon energy and source-to-detector distance. The spherical PTW 32002 chamber demonstrated greater stability in 60Co beams, while the cylindrical PTW 23361 exhibited better accuracy in 137Cs fields. These findings highlight the importance of chamber selection with respect to photon energy and dose rate, and confirm the compliance of the CNESTEN facility with international standards, thereby supporting reduced uncertainties and improved metrological traceability in calibration services.

60Co和137Cs参考光束中球形和圆柱形电离室(PTW 32002和PTW 23361)的比较评估:伽玛辐照器安装合规性的实验和蒙特卡罗评估。
在ISO/IEC 17025下运行的认可校准实验室,在伽玛和x射线场进行校准时,必须证明其设施符合ISO 4037等技术标准,通常使用电离室作为参考仪器。在此框架下,准确确定空气辐照率是确保辐射防护剂量学校准可靠性和国际可追溯性的关键步骤。本研究报告了两种不同几何形状的电离室的比较评估:PTW 32002(球形,1 L)和PTW 23361(圆柱形,30 cm3)。在CNESTEN校准实验室,采用这两种方法对137Cs和60Co参考辐射场进行了表征。利用MCNP6.1代码将实验结果与蒙特卡罗模拟提供的理论基准进行比较,与实测值进行比较研究。目的是验证安装是否符合平方反比定律,并评估两个探测器的计量适用性。实验结果与模拟结果基本一致,偏差范围为~0.2% ~ 10.5%,具体取决于光子能量和源-探测器距离。球形PTW 32002腔室在60Co光束中表现出更好的稳定性,而圆柱形PTW 23361腔室在137Cs场中表现出更好的精度。这些发现强调了腔室选择在光子能量和剂量率方面的重要性,并确认了CNESTEN设施符合国际标准,从而支持在校准服务中减少不确定性和改善计量可追溯性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书