The intervention to improve quality of life for African American lupus patients project: Incorporating the element of choice to improve disease self-management and quality of life: A randomized controlled study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1177/09612033261432151
Edith M Williams, Jerik Leung, Larisa Bruner, Jiajia Zhang, Jie Zhou, Jim C Oates
{"title":"The intervention to improve quality of life for African American lupus patients project: Incorporating the element of choice to improve disease self-management and quality of life: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Edith M Williams, Jerik Leung, Larisa Bruner, Jiajia Zhang, Jie Zhou, Jim C Oates","doi":"10.1177/09612033261432151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Intervention to Improve Quality of life for African American lupus patients (IQAN) Project is a three armed randomized, wait list-controlled trial focused on providing a variety of self-management tools to participants. We focus on African American individuals with lupus due to the increased morbidity and mortality in this population.PurposeTo examine whether a unique 'a-la-carte' self-management program improved quality of life, decreased depression, and reduced perceived and biological indicators of stress in African American lupus patients.MethodsIndividualized intervention plans (IIP's) offered 1-4 options, including a mail-delivered arthritis kit, message board, support group, and enrollment in a self-management program. A 'set menu' control condition included a standardized chronic disease self-management program only, and a control condition was usual care (UC). Validated measures of stress, depression, and quality of life were collected in all patients before and after intervention activities. To evaluate changes between baseline and post-intervention, compact scores were compared across groups, using two-sample t-tests.ResultsImprovements were observed in areas of stress management and pain management (<i>p</i> = 0.05). The frequency of managing pain by applying positive techniques increased in the intervention group (<i>p</i> = 0.08), but the other two groups did not display such improvements. An increasing trend persisted in the intervention group in the frequency of applying stress management techniques (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and decreasing trends in activity limitation were observed in both the intervention and set-menu control groups.ConclusionsBetter self-management outcomes were observed when participants were able to dictate the content or pace of the intervention program. This suggests that self-selection of program components has the potential to improve disparate trends in quality of life, disease activity and stress among African American lupus patients, which could impact future research and policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"581-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261432151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Intervention to Improve Quality of life for African American lupus patients (IQAN) Project is a three armed randomized, wait list-controlled trial focused on providing a variety of self-management tools to participants. We focus on African American individuals with lupus due to the increased morbidity and mortality in this population.PurposeTo examine whether a unique 'a-la-carte' self-management program improved quality of life, decreased depression, and reduced perceived and biological indicators of stress in African American lupus patients.MethodsIndividualized intervention plans (IIP's) offered 1-4 options, including a mail-delivered arthritis kit, message board, support group, and enrollment in a self-management program. A 'set menu' control condition included a standardized chronic disease self-management program only, and a control condition was usual care (UC). Validated measures of stress, depression, and quality of life were collected in all patients before and after intervention activities. To evaluate changes between baseline and post-intervention, compact scores were compared across groups, using two-sample t-tests.ResultsImprovements were observed in areas of stress management and pain management (p = 0.05). The frequency of managing pain by applying positive techniques increased in the intervention group (p = 0.08), but the other two groups did not display such improvements. An increasing trend persisted in the intervention group in the frequency of applying stress management techniques (p = 0.02) and decreasing trends in activity limitation were observed in both the intervention and set-menu control groups.ConclusionsBetter self-management outcomes were observed when participants were able to dictate the content or pace of the intervention program. This suggests that self-selection of program components has the potential to improve disparate trends in quality of life, disease activity and stress among African American lupus patients, which could impact future research and policy decisions.

改善非洲裔美国人狼疮患者生活质量的干预项目:纳入选择因素以改善疾病自我管理和生活质量:一项随机对照研究。
改善非洲裔美国人狼疮患者生活质量的干预(IQAN)项目是一项三组随机、等待名单对照试验,旨在为参与者提供各种自我管理工具。我们关注的是非裔美国人个体狼疮由于增加发病率和死亡率在这个人群。目的探讨一种独特的“单点”自我管理方案是否能改善非裔美国狼疮患者的生活质量,减少抑郁,降低应激的感知和生物学指标。方法个性化干预计划(IIP’s)提供1-4种选择,包括邮寄关节炎工具包、留言板、支持小组和参加自我管理计划。“设定菜单”控制条件仅包括标准化的慢性疾病自我管理程序,控制条件为常规护理(UC)。在干预活动前后收集所有患者的压力、抑郁和生活质量的有效测量。为了评估基线和干预后的变化,使用双样本t检验比较各组间的紧凑评分。结果两组患者在应激管理和疼痛管理方面均有改善(p = 0.05)。干预组应用积极技术治疗疼痛的频率增加(p = 0.08),但其他两组没有表现出这种改善。干预组应用压力管理技术的频率持续增加(p = 0.02),干预组和设置菜单对照组的活动限制均呈下降趋势。结论:当参与者能够决定干预计划的内容或节奏时,观察到更好的自我管理结果。这表明,项目组成部分的自我选择有可能改善非裔美国狼疮患者在生活质量、疾病活动和压力方面的不同趋势,这可能会影响未来的研究和政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书