Rapid EEG Monitoring in Clinical Practice.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001192
Kapil Gururangan, Santiago Philibert-Rosas, Thanujaa Subramaniam
{"title":"Rapid EEG Monitoring in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Kapil Gururangan, Santiago Philibert-Rosas, Thanujaa Subramaniam","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Rapid electroencephalography (EEG) devices have emerged in response to the growing awareness of seizures and highly epileptiform patterns in critically ill patients and limitations associated with conventional EEG infrastructure. In this review, we describe rapid EEG utilization patterns, clinical workflows, implementation challenges, and financial considerations using a narrative review supplemented by a multi-institutional survey of 20 centers affiliated within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium. We identified that rapid EEG was perceived to expedite diagnosis and treatment decisions and enhance clinical triage, and most respondents perceived the cost of rapid EEG sessions to be low. However, commonly cited limitations included lower spatial resolution and unsuitability for replacing conventional EEG for prolonged monitoring. Prior cohort studies and clinical trials of rapid EEG devices display site-by-site variability in practical workflows regarding specificity of clinical indications for monitoring and designated personnel for device setup and EEG review, however, rapid EEG was reported to consistently augment EEG monitoring capabilities even at centers with access to conventional EEG. Because rapid EEG devices are increasingly adopted, and paired with artificial intelligence tools, it will be vital for institutions to develop protocols and guidelines with multidisciplinary input to steer their responsible, effective, and sustainable use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"43 3","pages":"222-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Rapid electroencephalography (EEG) devices have emerged in response to the growing awareness of seizures and highly epileptiform patterns in critically ill patients and limitations associated with conventional EEG infrastructure. In this review, we describe rapid EEG utilization patterns, clinical workflows, implementation challenges, and financial considerations using a narrative review supplemented by a multi-institutional survey of 20 centers affiliated within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium. We identified that rapid EEG was perceived to expedite diagnosis and treatment decisions and enhance clinical triage, and most respondents perceived the cost of rapid EEG sessions to be low. However, commonly cited limitations included lower spatial resolution and unsuitability for replacing conventional EEG for prolonged monitoring. Prior cohort studies and clinical trials of rapid EEG devices display site-by-site variability in practical workflows regarding specificity of clinical indications for monitoring and designated personnel for device setup and EEG review, however, rapid EEG was reported to consistently augment EEG monitoring capabilities even at centers with access to conventional EEG. Because rapid EEG devices are increasingly adopted, and paired with artificial intelligence tools, it will be vital for institutions to develop protocols and guidelines with multidisciplinary input to steer their responsible, effective, and sustainable use.

快速脑电图监测在临床中的应用。
摘要:快速脑电图(EEG)设备的出现是为了响应人们对危重患者癫痫发作和高度癫痫样模式的日益认识,以及传统脑电图基础设施的局限性。在这篇综述中,我们描述了快速脑电图利用模式、临床工作流程、实施挑战和财务考虑,采用叙述性综述,并辅以对重症监护脑电图监测研究联盟附属的20个中心的多机构调查。我们发现,快速脑电图被认为可以加快诊断和治疗决策,并加强临床分诊,大多数受访者认为快速脑电图的成本较低。然而,通常引用的限制包括较低的空间分辨率和不适合取代传统脑电图长时间监测。先前的队列研究和快速脑电图设备的临床试验显示,在实际工作流程中,关于监测的临床适应症的特异性、设备设置和脑电图检查的指定人员的差异,然而,据报道,快速脑电图持续增强脑电图监测能力,即使在使用传统脑电图的中心。由于越来越多地采用快速脑电图设备,并与人工智能工具相结合,各机构制定多学科投入的协议和指南,以指导其负责任、有效和可持续的使用,这将是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书