Clinical practice for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in Denmark.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Rasmus Linnebjerg Knudsen, Cecilie Dupont Harwood, Mathias Therkel Stensbæk, Sanja Pisljagic, Bjarke Viberg, Jonas Askø Andersen, Claus Varnum, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Anders Kehlet Nørskov
{"title":"Clinical practice for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in Denmark.","authors":"Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Rasmus Linnebjerg Knudsen, Cecilie Dupont Harwood, Mathias Therkel Stensbæk, Sanja Pisljagic, Bjarke Viberg, Jonas Askø Andersen, Claus Varnum, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Anders Kehlet Nørskov","doi":"10.61409/A08250653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common, with over 14,000 annual cases in Denmark. Most cases are treated non-surgically and may require closed reduction prior to casting. National guidelines for anaesthesia and reduction technique for closed reduction of DRFs are lacking, impacting clinical practices and potentially optimal care. This survey aimed to describe Danish clinical practice for initial treatment and closed reduction of DRFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and April 2025, the survey was distributed online to the 23 physicians responsible for all 44 emergency departments and minor injury units treating DRFs in Denmark. The survey examined the clinical practices used for anaesthesia, reduction technique and post-reduction follow-up for patients with DRFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 100% (23/23). All departments used haematoma block as anaesthetic method. Manual reduction followed by induced muscle fatigue was reported as the preferred reduction technique (87%, 20/23). Among these, 80% (16/20) mentioned that finger-trap-traction was used as a muscle-fatiguing method. All sites used X-ray imaging to assess the reduction result. Surgery was offered when reduction was unsatisfactory, depending on various criteria, e.g. Clinical Frailty Scale, age or clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Denmark, haematoma block is the standard anaesthetic method for the closed reduction procedure of DRFs. Mostly finger-trap traction is used to induce muscle relaxation before manual reduction. Clinical practice is generally well-aligned with minor variation in surgical intervention criteria.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A08250653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common, with over 14,000 annual cases in Denmark. Most cases are treated non-surgically and may require closed reduction prior to casting. National guidelines for anaesthesia and reduction technique for closed reduction of DRFs are lacking, impacting clinical practices and potentially optimal care. This survey aimed to describe Danish clinical practice for initial treatment and closed reduction of DRFs.

Methods: Between January and April 2025, the survey was distributed online to the 23 physicians responsible for all 44 emergency departments and minor injury units treating DRFs in Denmark. The survey examined the clinical practices used for anaesthesia, reduction technique and post-reduction follow-up for patients with DRFs.

Results: The response rate was 100% (23/23). All departments used haematoma block as anaesthetic method. Manual reduction followed by induced muscle fatigue was reported as the preferred reduction technique (87%, 20/23). Among these, 80% (16/20) mentioned that finger-trap-traction was used as a muscle-fatiguing method. All sites used X-ray imaging to assess the reduction result. Surgery was offered when reduction was unsatisfactory, depending on various criteria, e.g. Clinical Frailty Scale, age or clinical assessment.

Conclusions: In Denmark, haematoma block is the standard anaesthetic method for the closed reduction procedure of DRFs. Mostly finger-trap traction is used to induce muscle relaxation before manual reduction. Clinical practice is generally well-aligned with minor variation in surgical intervention criteria.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

丹麦桡骨远端骨折闭式复位术的临床实践。
桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)很常见,在丹麦每年有超过14000例。大多数病例采用非手术治疗,可能需要在铸造前闭合复位。缺乏关于闭合复位drf的麻醉和复位技术的国家指南,这影响了临床实践和潜在的最佳护理。本调查旨在描述丹麦临床实践的初始治疗和闭合复位DRFs。方法:在2025年1月至4月期间,调查在线分发给负责丹麦所有44个急诊科和治疗DRFs的轻伤单位的23名医生。该调查检查了DRFs患者用于麻醉、复位技术和复位后随访的临床实践。结果:有效率为100%(23/23)。各科室均采用血肿阻滞麻醉。手动复位后诱发肌肉疲劳是首选复位技术(87%,20/23)。其中,80%(16/20)的患者提到使用手指夹牵引作为肌肉疲劳法。所有部位均采用x射线成像评估复位效果。根据不同的标准,如临床虚弱量表、年龄或临床评估,当复位不满意时,提供手术治疗。结论:在丹麦,血肿阻滞是DRFs闭合复位手术的标准麻醉方法。在手动复位前,主要采用指夹牵引诱导肌肉放松。临床实践通常与手术干预标准的微小变化保持一致。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书