South African speech-language therapists' perceived competencies and use of Makaton.

IF 1.7 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Chriséle Mc Geer, Carmen Milton, Carlien Vorster, Marien Graham
{"title":"South African speech-language therapists' perceived competencies and use of Makaton.","authors":"Chriséle Mc Geer, Carmen Milton, Carlien Vorster, Marien Graham","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v73i1.1154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Makaton, an unaided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) method, is widely used by speech-language therapists (SLTs) in diverse clinical and educational settings. Despite its applicability across populations with complex communication needs, limited research has explored how South African SLTs perceive, use and experience Makaton. This gap is significant given South Africa's multilingual context, resource disparities and the need for culturally relevant AAC strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to explore South African SLTs' perceived competencies and use of Makaton.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> This study employed a mixed-methods design. An online survey comprising closed- and open-ended questions was distributed to SLTs across South Africa. A total of 57 participants were included in the study. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative responses were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> While 87.7% of participants viewed Makaton as valuable, only 5.5% reported feeling very confident using it. No statistically significant difference between recommending Makaton to parents and team members (Wilcoxon signed-rank [WSR] = -1.386, p = 0.166). Four themes captured Makaton's perceived value: (1) multimodal communication, (2) accessibility and practicality, (3) support for speech and language development and (4) inclusion and social interaction. Reported challenges included: (1) limited awareness and training, (2) financial and/or resource constraints, (3) poor consistency and carryover, (4) motor and/or cognitive limitations and (5) cultural and regional mismatches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> While Makaton is positively regarded by SLTs, limited training, confidence and implementation support hinder consistent use.Contribution: Expanding access to training and embedding Makaton in professional education may enhance AAC service delivery in the multilingual South African context.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"73 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v73i1.1154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Makaton, an unaided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) method, is widely used by speech-language therapists (SLTs) in diverse clinical and educational settings. Despite its applicability across populations with complex communication needs, limited research has explored how South African SLTs perceive, use and experience Makaton. This gap is significant given South Africa's multilingual context, resource disparities and the need for culturally relevant AAC strategies.

Objectives:  This study aimed to explore South African SLTs' perceived competencies and use of Makaton.

Method:  This study employed a mixed-methods design. An online survey comprising closed- and open-ended questions was distributed to SLTs across South Africa. A total of 57 participants were included in the study. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative responses were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework.

Results:  While 87.7% of participants viewed Makaton as valuable, only 5.5% reported feeling very confident using it. No statistically significant difference between recommending Makaton to parents and team members (Wilcoxon signed-rank [WSR] = -1.386, p = 0.166). Four themes captured Makaton's perceived value: (1) multimodal communication, (2) accessibility and practicality, (3) support for speech and language development and (4) inclusion and social interaction. Reported challenges included: (1) limited awareness and training, (2) financial and/or resource constraints, (3) poor consistency and carryover, (4) motor and/or cognitive limitations and (5) cultural and regional mismatches.

Conclusion:  While Makaton is positively regarded by SLTs, limited training, confidence and implementation support hinder consistent use.Contribution: Expanding access to training and embedding Makaton in professional education may enhance AAC service delivery in the multilingual South African context.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

南非语言治疗师的感知能力和Makaton的使用。
背景:Makaton是一种非辅助的辅助和替代沟通(AAC)方法,被语言治疗师(SLTs)广泛应用于各种临床和教育环境。尽管它适用于具有复杂通信需求的人群,但有限的研究已经探讨了南非的slt如何感知、使用和体验Makaton。考虑到南非的多语言环境、资源差距和需要制定与文化相关的AAC战略,这一差距是巨大的。目的:本研究旨在探讨南非外语教师的感知能力和马卡顿语的使用情况。方法:采用混合方法设计。一份包括封闭式和开放式问题的在线调查已分发给南非各地的特殊教育教师。共有57名参与者参与了这项研究。定量回答使用描述性和推理统计进行分析,而定性回答使用Braun和Clarke的六阶段框架进行主题分析。结果:虽然87.7%的参与者认为Makaton很有价值,但只有5.5%的人表示对使用Makaton很有信心。向家长和团队成员推荐Makaton的差异无统计学意义(Wilcoxon sign -rank [WSR] = -1.386, p = 0.166)。四个主题体现了Makaton的感知价值:(1)多模式交流;(2)可及性和实用性;(3)对言语和语言发展的支持;(4)包容和社会互动。报告的挑战包括:(1)意识和培训有限;(2)财政和/或资源限制;(3)一致性差和结转能力差;(4)运动和/或认知限制;(5)文化和地区不匹配。结论:虽然Makaton得到了slt的积极评价,但有限的培训、信心和实施支持阻碍了持续使用。贡献:扩大获得培训的机会,并将马卡顿纳入专业教育,可能会在多语言的南非背景下加强AAC的服务提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书