Development and Performance Validation of an Automated Generative Pretrained Transformer–Based Evaluation Tool for the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yu-Jeng Ju PhD, Yi-Ching Wang OT, PhD, Fan Chou MD, Wen-Hsuan Hou MD, MPH, PhD, Shu-Mei Chen PT, PhD, Ching-Lin Hsieh OTR, PhD
{"title":"Development and Performance Validation of an Automated Generative Pretrained Transformer–Based Evaluation Tool for the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale","authors":"Yu-Jeng Ju PhD,&nbsp;Yi-Ching Wang OT, PhD,&nbsp;Fan Chou MD,&nbsp;Wen-Hsuan Hou MD, MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Shu-Mei Chen PT, PhD,&nbsp;Ching-Lin Hsieh OTR, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2026.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop an automated generative pretrained transformer (GPT)- physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) evaluation tool (GPT-PEDro ET) and validate its performance (including intrarater reliability and concurrent validity) for evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs using the PEDro scale.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A psychometric validation study with a repeated measurements design.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Research laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>One hundred and twenty-five RCTs on neurofacilitation interventions in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved from the PEDro database.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was RCT quality scores evaluated using the GPT-PEDro ET tool at both total score and individual item levels across 2 rounds of evaluation. Intrarater reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for total score and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ (PABAK) for individual items. Concurrent validity was assessed with ICC (total score) and PABAK (individual item), Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement, and heteroscedasticity testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GPT-PEDro ET tool achieved almost perfect intrarater reliability (total score ICC=1.00; individual item PABAK=0.94-1.00). The concurrent validity was moderate to high at both the total score level (ICCs=0.83, 0.83) and the individual item level for all the items (PABAKs=0.68-0.97).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggest that the GPT-PEDro ET tool may be a useful automated tool for evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs. It shows potential for reducing manual evaluation workload and supporting clinical and research applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 10","pages":"Pages 2647-2656"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999326000900","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To develop an automated generative pretrained transformer (GPT)- physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) evaluation tool (GPT-PEDro ET) and validate its performance (including intrarater reliability and concurrent validity) for evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs using the PEDro scale.

Design

A psychometric validation study with a repeated measurements design.

Setting

Research laboratory.

Participants

One hundred and twenty-five RCTs on neurofacilitation interventions in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved from the PEDro database.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was RCT quality scores evaluated using the GPT-PEDro ET tool at both total score and individual item levels across 2 rounds of evaluation. Intrarater reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for total score and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ (PABAK) for individual items. Concurrent validity was assessed with ICC (total score) and PABAK (individual item), Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement, and heteroscedasticity testing.

Results

The GPT-PEDro ET tool achieved almost perfect intrarater reliability (total score ICC=1.00; individual item PABAK=0.94-1.00). The concurrent validity was moderate to high at both the total score level (ICCs=0.83, 0.83) and the individual item level for all the items (PABAKs=0.68-0.97).

Conclusions

The results suggest that the GPT-PEDro ET tool may be a useful automated tool for evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs. It shows potential for reducing manual evaluation workload and supporting clinical and research applications.
PEDro量表基于gpt的自动评估工具的开发和性能验证。
目的:开发一种自动化的GPT-PEDro评估工具(GPT-PEDro ET),并验证其性能(包括量表内信度和并发效度),用于评估使用PEDro量表的随机对照试验的方法学质量。设计:一项具有重复测量设计的心理测量验证研究。环境:研究实验室。参与者:从PEDro数据库中检索了125项关于脑卒中康复中神经促进干预的随机对照试验。主要结果和测量方法:主要结果为两轮评估中GPT-PEDro ET在总分和单项水平上评估的RCT质量分数。用总得分的类内相关系数(ICC)和个别项目的流行校正和偏倚校正kappa (PABAK)来确定评分内信度。采用ICC(总分)和PABAK(单项)、Bland-Altman分析(95%一致限)和异方差检验评估并发效度。结果:GPT-PEDro ET获得了近乎完美的评分内信度(总分ICC = 1.00;单项PABAK = 0.94-1.00)。在总分水平上(ICCs = 0.83,0.83)和单项水平上(PABAKs = 0.68-0.97),各项目的并发效度均为中至高。结论:结果表明GPT-PEDro ET可能是评估随机对照试验方法学质量的有用自动化工具。它显示了减少人工评估工作量和支持临床和研究应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书