Danish cross-cultural adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ditte Bekker-Jensen, Jesper Kjaergaard, Søren T Skou, Anders Wieghorst, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Sofie Moesgaard Bergholdt, Henrik Schmidt, Nicola Straiton, Britt Borregaard
{"title":"Danish cross-cultural adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire.","authors":"Ditte Bekker-Jensen, Jesper Kjaergaard, Søren T Skou, Anders Wieghorst, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Sofie Moesgaard Bergholdt, Henrik Schmidt, Nicola Straiton, Britt Borregaard","doi":"10.61409/A07250547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acceptability of healthcare interventions among patients and healthcare professionals is important for effective and efficient implementation in clinical settings. To standardise the assessment of acceptability of healthcare interventions, the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) questionnaire was developed. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the TFA questionnaire into Danish.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TFA was forward- and back-translated and pre-tested in accordance with Beaton's guidelines. Following an iterative process, the pre-final questionnaire was field-tested through cognitive interviews using verbal probing and think-aloud techniques to assess relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following translation, 30 participants (37% female, mean age 61 years) completed cognitive interviews. The population included cardiac arrest survivors and their relatives, patients with hypercholesterolaemia, knee/hip osteoarthritis and patients at risk of heart failure. Five iterative rounds informed adaptations of the Danish version, resolving misinterpretations and improving clarity. Four main issues were identified: 1) structure of the questionnaire, 2) translation of the terms \"acceptability\" and \"intervention\", 3) wording of the Likert scale and 4) item-specific interpretation problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following international guidelines, the TFA questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish, addressing key linguistic and conceptual challenges.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>We acknowledge the University of Southern Denmark and the BOX-trial for supporting this project.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A07250547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acceptability of healthcare interventions among patients and healthcare professionals is important for effective and efficient implementation in clinical settings. To standardise the assessment of acceptability of healthcare interventions, the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) questionnaire was developed. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the TFA questionnaire into Danish.

Methods: The TFA was forward- and back-translated and pre-tested in accordance with Beaton's guidelines. Following an iterative process, the pre-final questionnaire was field-tested through cognitive interviews using verbal probing and think-aloud techniques to assess relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.

Results: Following translation, 30 participants (37% female, mean age 61 years) completed cognitive interviews. The population included cardiac arrest survivors and their relatives, patients with hypercholesterolaemia, knee/hip osteoarthritis and patients at risk of heart failure. Five iterative rounds informed adaptations of the Danish version, resolving misinterpretations and improving clarity. Four main issues were identified: 1) structure of the questionnaire, 2) translation of the terms "acceptability" and "intervention", 3) wording of the Likert scale and 4) item-specific interpretation problems.

Conclusions: Following international guidelines, the TFA questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish, addressing key linguistic and conceptual challenges.

Funding: We acknowledge the University of Southern Denmark and the BOX-trial for supporting this project.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

丹麦跨文化适应的可接受性问卷理论框架。
简介:在患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的医疗保健干预的可接受性是重要的有效和高效的实施在临床设置。为了规范医疗保健干预措施可接受性的评估,制定了可接受性理论框架(TFA)问卷。在本研究中,我们旨在将TFA问卷翻译成丹麦语并进行跨文化调整。方法:按照Beaton指南对TFA进行前后翻译和预测试。在一个反复的过程中,最终前的问卷通过认知访谈进行实地测试,使用口头探究和出声思考技术来评估相关性,全面性和可理解性。结果:翻译后,30名参与者(37%为女性,平均年龄61岁)完成了认知访谈。研究对象包括心脏骤停幸存者及其亲属、高胆固醇血症患者、膝/髋骨关节炎患者和有心力衰竭风险的患者。五个迭代的回合通知了丹麦版本的改编,解决了误解并提高了清晰度。确定了四个主要问题:1)问卷的结构;2)“可接受性”和“干预”这两个词的翻译;3)李克特量表的措辞;4)具体项目的解释问题。结论:遵循国际准则,TFA问卷成功翻译并跨文化改编为丹麦语,解决了关键的语言和概念挑战。资助:我们感谢南丹麦大学和BOX-trial项目对本项目的支持。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书