Ditte Bekker-Jensen, Jesper Kjaergaard, Søren T Skou, Anders Wieghorst, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Sofie Moesgaard Bergholdt, Henrik Schmidt, Nicola Straiton, Britt Borregaard
{"title":"Danish cross-cultural adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire.","authors":"Ditte Bekker-Jensen, Jesper Kjaergaard, Søren T Skou, Anders Wieghorst, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Sofie Moesgaard Bergholdt, Henrik Schmidt, Nicola Straiton, Britt Borregaard","doi":"10.61409/A07250547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acceptability of healthcare interventions among patients and healthcare professionals is important for effective and efficient implementation in clinical settings. To standardise the assessment of acceptability of healthcare interventions, the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) questionnaire was developed. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the TFA questionnaire into Danish.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TFA was forward- and back-translated and pre-tested in accordance with Beaton's guidelines. Following an iterative process, the pre-final questionnaire was field-tested through cognitive interviews using verbal probing and think-aloud techniques to assess relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following translation, 30 participants (37% female, mean age 61 years) completed cognitive interviews. The population included cardiac arrest survivors and their relatives, patients with hypercholesterolaemia, knee/hip osteoarthritis and patients at risk of heart failure. Five iterative rounds informed adaptations of the Danish version, resolving misinterpretations and improving clarity. Four main issues were identified: 1) structure of the questionnaire, 2) translation of the terms \"acceptability\" and \"intervention\", 3) wording of the Likert scale and 4) item-specific interpretation problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following international guidelines, the TFA questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish, addressing key linguistic and conceptual challenges.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>We acknowledge the University of Southern Denmark and the BOX-trial for supporting this project.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A07250547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Acceptability of healthcare interventions among patients and healthcare professionals is important for effective and efficient implementation in clinical settings. To standardise the assessment of acceptability of healthcare interventions, the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) questionnaire was developed. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the TFA questionnaire into Danish.
Methods: The TFA was forward- and back-translated and pre-tested in accordance with Beaton's guidelines. Following an iterative process, the pre-final questionnaire was field-tested through cognitive interviews using verbal probing and think-aloud techniques to assess relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.
Results: Following translation, 30 participants (37% female, mean age 61 years) completed cognitive interviews. The population included cardiac arrest survivors and their relatives, patients with hypercholesterolaemia, knee/hip osteoarthritis and patients at risk of heart failure. Five iterative rounds informed adaptations of the Danish version, resolving misinterpretations and improving clarity. Four main issues were identified: 1) structure of the questionnaire, 2) translation of the terms "acceptability" and "intervention", 3) wording of the Likert scale and 4) item-specific interpretation problems.
Conclusions: Following international guidelines, the TFA questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish, addressing key linguistic and conceptual challenges.
Funding: We acknowledge the University of Southern Denmark and the BOX-trial for supporting this project.
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.