Assessing the ability of SARC-F to reflect elastography-based muscle quality in older adults.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2026.2639701
Ali Akin, Çağatay Çavuşoğlu, Recep Aydın
{"title":"Assessing the ability of SARC-F to reflect elastography-based muscle quality in older adults.","authors":"Ali Akin, Çağatay Çavuşoğlu, Recep Aydın","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2026.2639701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function associated with aging. Studies evaluating the relationship between sarcopenia screening tools and elastography-based muscle quality measurements are quite limited. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the SARC-F score and muscle elasticity in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 140 adults aged ≥60 years attending geriatric or internal medicine outpatient clinics at a tertiary academic center. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, BMI, nutritional status (MNA-SF), frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale, FRAIL), and SARC-F scores were recorded. Rectus femoris thickness and elasticity were assessed using shear-wave elastography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 65 (60-91), and 62.9% (n = 88) were female. Positive SARC-F screen (SARC-F ≥ 4) was observed in 29.3% (n = 41). Participants at risk for sarcopenia were older (70 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), more frail (CFS 5 vs. 3, p < 0.001), more malnourished (MNA-SF 10 vs. 13, p < 0.001), and had lower RF thickness (8.4 vs. 9.8 mm, p = 0.013) and lower muscle elasticity (10.9 vs. 14.6 kPa, p = 0.002). A weak negative correlation was found between SARC-F and RF elasticity (ρ = -0.315, p < 0.001). In the age- and sex-adjusted model, this association was no longer significant (p = 0.116). In multivariable stepwise regression, RF elasticity was not independently associated with SARC-F. .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SARC-F is a practical screening tool for sarcopenia risk but may not adequately reflect muscle quality. These findings suggest that incorporating muscle quality assessments (e.g. shear-wave elastography) into sarcopenia screening may improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"258-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2026.2639701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function associated with aging. Studies evaluating the relationship between sarcopenia screening tools and elastography-based muscle quality measurements are quite limited. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the SARC-F score and muscle elasticity in older adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 140 adults aged ≥60 years attending geriatric or internal medicine outpatient clinics at a tertiary academic center. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, BMI, nutritional status (MNA-SF), frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale, FRAIL), and SARC-F scores were recorded. Rectus femoris thickness and elasticity were assessed using shear-wave elastography.

Results: The median age was 65 (60-91), and 62.9% (n = 88) were female. Positive SARC-F screen (SARC-F ≥ 4) was observed in 29.3% (n = 41). Participants at risk for sarcopenia were older (70 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), more frail (CFS 5 vs. 3, p < 0.001), more malnourished (MNA-SF 10 vs. 13, p < 0.001), and had lower RF thickness (8.4 vs. 9.8 mm, p = 0.013) and lower muscle elasticity (10.9 vs. 14.6 kPa, p = 0.002). A weak negative correlation was found between SARC-F and RF elasticity (ρ = -0.315, p < 0.001). In the age- and sex-adjusted model, this association was no longer significant (p = 0.116). In multivariable stepwise regression, RF elasticity was not independently associated with SARC-F. .

Conclusions: SARC-F is a practical screening tool for sarcopenia risk but may not adequately reflect muscle quality. These findings suggest that incorporating muscle quality assessments (e.g. shear-wave elastography) into sarcopenia screening may improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical management.

评估老年人SARC-F反映弹性成像肌肉质量的能力。
背景:骨骼肌减少症是一种老年综合征,以骨骼肌质量、力量和功能的进行性丧失为特征,与年龄有关。评估肌肉减少症筛查工具和基于弹性成像的肌肉质量测量之间关系的研究相当有限。本研究的主要目的是评估老年人SARC-F评分与肌肉弹性之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究纳入140名年龄≥60岁的成人,在某三级学术中心的老年或内科门诊就诊。记录社会人口学特征、合并症、BMI、营养状况(MNA-SF)、虚弱(临床虚弱量表,虚弱)和SARC-F评分。采用剪切波弹性成像技术评估股直肌厚度和弹性。结果:中位年龄65岁(60 ~ 91岁),女性占62.9% (n = 88)。SARC-F筛查阳性(SARC-F≥4)者占29.3% (n = 41)。有肌少症风险的参与者年龄较大(70岁vs 64岁)。结论:SARC-F是肌少症风险的实用筛查工具,但可能不能充分反映肌肉质量。这些发现表明,将肌肉质量评估(如剪切波弹性成像)纳入肌肉减少症筛查可以提高诊断准确性和临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书