Robot-Related Workers' Compensation Claims in Ohio, 2001-2020.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1002/ajim.70067
Vaishakhi Suresh, Srinivas Konda, Justin M Haney, Hugo E Camargo, Marvin Cheng, Darlene Weaver, Steven J Wurzelbacher, Alysha R Meyers, Steven J Naber, Mike Lampl
{"title":"Robot-Related Workers' Compensation Claims in Ohio, 2001-2020.","authors":"Vaishakhi Suresh, Srinivas Konda, Justin M Haney, Hugo E Camargo, Marvin Cheng, Darlene Weaver, Steven J Wurzelbacher, Alysha R Meyers, Steven J Naber, Mike Lampl","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased robot adoption and advancements in robotics have led to the emergence of robotic arms for collaborative applications that work alongside humans, increasing direct human-robot interaction. This shift highlights the need to address new safety challenges posed by emerging robotic technologies. Currently, there is limited research on robot-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Robot-related workers' compensation claims from 2001 to 2020 were identified using a keyword search from the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (OHBWC) database. Descriptive analyses were conducted on this claims dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2001 to 2020, 1076 robot-related claims were identified, with 85% medical-only claims (medical care only and/or ≤ 7 days away from work). Most claimants were male (74.2%), and 51.1% were 25-44 years old. More than half of the claims were due to contact with objects and equipment (57.9%), followed by overexertion and bodily reaction (20.6%). Most injuries occurred in the manufacturing sector (75.1%), followed by the service sector (14.7%). The claims resulted in over $8.3 million in costs. Of this figure, 91% was incurred due to lost-time claims ($7.6 million). Almost 30% of claims included diagnoses from multiple diagnosis groups. Most claims involved working with robotic arms for collaborative applications (75.7%) in a shared workspace.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotics is rapidly evolving to remove workers from hazardous environments and reduce risks from hazardous, repetitive, and manual tasks, but it may introduce new workplace hazards. There is a need to study robot-related injuries, identify high-risk exposures, and develop sector- or application-specific comprehensive safety approaches for safer implementation of robots in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":"345-357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13130054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased robot adoption and advancements in robotics have led to the emergence of robotic arms for collaborative applications that work alongside humans, increasing direct human-robot interaction. This shift highlights the need to address new safety challenges posed by emerging robotic technologies. Currently, there is limited research on robot-related injuries.

Methods: Robot-related workers' compensation claims from 2001 to 2020 were identified using a keyword search from the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (OHBWC) database. Descriptive analyses were conducted on this claims dataset.

Results: From 2001 to 2020, 1076 robot-related claims were identified, with 85% medical-only claims (medical care only and/or ≤ 7 days away from work). Most claimants were male (74.2%), and 51.1% were 25-44 years old. More than half of the claims were due to contact with objects and equipment (57.9%), followed by overexertion and bodily reaction (20.6%). Most injuries occurred in the manufacturing sector (75.1%), followed by the service sector (14.7%). The claims resulted in over $8.3 million in costs. Of this figure, 91% was incurred due to lost-time claims ($7.6 million). Almost 30% of claims included diagnoses from multiple diagnosis groups. Most claims involved working with robotic arms for collaborative applications (75.7%) in a shared workspace.

Conclusions: Robotics is rapidly evolving to remove workers from hazardous environments and reduce risks from hazardous, repetitive, and manual tasks, but it may introduce new workplace hazards. There is a need to study robot-related injuries, identify high-risk exposures, and develop sector- or application-specific comprehensive safety approaches for safer implementation of robots in the workplace.

2001-2020年俄亥俄州与机器人相关的工人赔偿索赔
背景:越来越多的机器人采用和机器人技术的进步导致了用于与人类一起工作的协作应用的机械臂的出现,增加了直接的人机交互。这种转变凸显了应对新兴机器人技术带来的新安全挑战的必要性。目前,对机器人相关损伤的研究有限。方法:使用俄亥俄州工人赔偿局(OHBWC)数据库中的关键词搜索,确定2001年至2020年与机器人相关的工人赔偿索赔。对该索赔数据集进行描述性分析。结果:从2001年到2020年,确定了1076起与机器人相关的索赔,其中85%仅用于医疗索赔(仅用于医疗和/或≤7天的休假)。多数患者为男性(74.2%),51.1%的患者年龄在25-44岁之间。超过一半的索赔是由于接触物体和设备(57.9%),其次是过度劳累和身体反应(20.6%)。工伤最多的是制造业(75.1%),其次是服务业(14.7%)。这些索赔导致了830多万美元的费用。在这一数字中,91%是由于失时索赔(760万美元)。几乎30%的索赔包括来自多个诊断组的诊断。大多数索赔涉及在共享工作空间中使用机械臂进行协作应用(75.7%)。结论:机器人技术正在迅速发展,可以将工人从危险环境中移除,降低危险、重复和手动任务的风险,但它可能会带来新的工作场所危害。有必要研究机器人相关的伤害,识别高风险暴露,并开发特定部门或应用的综合安全方法,以便在工作场所更安全地实施机器人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书