{"title":"Clinical impact of early changes in guideline-directed medical therapy after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.","authors":"Ayano Yoshida, Masanori Yamamoto, Gaku Nakazawa, Kazuki Mizutani, Nobuhiro Yamada, Naoko Soejima, Takayuki Kawamura, Hiroki Matsuzoe, Tatsuya Miyoshi, Mike Saji, Shunsuke Kubo, Masahiko Asami, Yusuke Enta, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Izumo, Shingo Mizuno, Yusuke Watanabe, Makoto Amaki, Kazuhisa Kodama, Hisao Otsuki, Toru Naganuma, Hiroki Bota, Yohei Ohno, Masahiro Yamawaki, Hiroshi Ueno, Daisuke Hachinohe, Yuki Izumi, Tetsuro Shimura, Atsushi Sugiura, Toshiaki Otsuka, Kentaro Hayashida","doi":"10.1093/ejhf/xuag005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an established therapy for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is ideally optimized before M-TEER, this procedure may facilitate early post-procedural GDMT changes. However, the clinical impact of early in-hospital GDMT modifications remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 1638 patients with FMR and LVEF <50% enrolled in a multicentre Japanese registry. The patients were stratified according to the number of GDMT classes prescribed at discharge (single [n = 183]; double [n = 505]; triple [n = 630]; quadruple [n = 320]). Changes from before M-TEER to discharge were categorized as increased (n = 271), unchanged (n = 1219), or decreased (n = 148). Associations between GDMT patterns and subsequent outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary endpoints were achieved in 357 patients (22%). Event rates decreased across groups (single, 32%; double, 24%; triple, 21%; quadruple, 14%; P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, a greater number of GDMT classes at discharge independently predicted better prognosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.95), whereas pre-M-TEER GDMT was not significant. Compared with decreased GDMT, an unchanged status was not associated with improved outcomes, while an increased status significantly improved prognosis (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with FMR and LVEF <50%, a higher number of GDMT classes at discharge and in-hospital uptitration of the GDMT class were associated with better outcomes, suggesting that early post-procedural GDMT optimization warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an established therapy for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is ideally optimized before M-TEER, this procedure may facilitate early post-procedural GDMT changes. However, the clinical impact of early in-hospital GDMT modifications remains unclear.
Methods: We analysed 1638 patients with FMR and LVEF <50% enrolled in a multicentre Japanese registry. The patients were stratified according to the number of GDMT classes prescribed at discharge (single [n = 183]; double [n = 505]; triple [n = 630]; quadruple [n = 320]). Changes from before M-TEER to discharge were categorized as increased (n = 271), unchanged (n = 1219), or decreased (n = 148). Associations between GDMT patterns and subsequent outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year.
Results: Primary endpoints were achieved in 357 patients (22%). Event rates decreased across groups (single, 32%; double, 24%; triple, 21%; quadruple, 14%; P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, a greater number of GDMT classes at discharge independently predicted better prognosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.95), whereas pre-M-TEER GDMT was not significant. Compared with decreased GDMT, an unchanged status was not associated with improved outcomes, while an increased status significantly improved prognosis (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99).
Conclusion: In patients with FMR and LVEF <50%, a higher number of GDMT classes at discharge and in-hospital uptitration of the GDMT class were associated with better outcomes, suggesting that early post-procedural GDMT optimization warrants further investigation.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.