Enhanced accuracy in nuclear fuel analysis: a novel standard addition method with LIBS for quantifying La and Nd in unknown Th-U MOX fuel

IF 1.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 OPTICS
Min Zhang, Hao Li, Qingyao Meng, Lingling Peng, Debo Wu, Yuhong Li, Zuoye Liu, Xiaoliang Liu, Xiaoyan Li, Yanhua Shi
{"title":"Enhanced accuracy in nuclear fuel analysis: a novel standard addition method with LIBS for quantifying La and Nd in unknown Th-U MOX fuel","authors":"Min Zhang,&nbsp;Hao Li,&nbsp;Qingyao Meng,&nbsp;Lingling Peng,&nbsp;Debo Wu,&nbsp;Yuhong Li,&nbsp;Zuoye Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Li,&nbsp;Yanhua Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00340-026-08624-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Impurity elements such as lanthanum (La) and neodymium (Nd) in nuclear fuel can adversely impact its efficiency and operational lifespan, making their accurate quantification essential. This study employed laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) to analyze La and Nd in unknown thorium (Th) uranium (U) mixed oxide (Th-U MOX) fuel materials. A novel difference method (DM) was integrated with the standard addition method (SAM) and compared with the conventional extrapolation method (EM). Following a rigorous comparison, three analytical lines for each element were selected: 442.99 nm, 465.55 nm and 545.51 nm for La, and 430.35 nm, 445.15 nm and 529.31 nm for Nd. At 465.55 nm, the SAM-DM approach predicted a La concentration of 530 ppm with a relative error of the mean (REM) of 5.2%, markedly lower than the EM result of 600 ppm (REM = 24.9%). For Nd at 529.31 nm, SAM-DM yielded 475 ppm with 4.5% REM, compared to 550 ppm and 10.6% REM by EM. These results confirm the superior accuracy of SAM-DM over EM, particularly at the selected analytical lines. The two lines were subsequently used to construct optimized calibration curves, yielding limits of detection (LODs) of 155.22 ppm for La and 355.97 ppm for Nd. Furthermore, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) confirmed the robustness of the proposed strategy, with prediction errors generally below 9% except in low concentration cases. Overall, this work establishes a reliable analytical framework for nuclear fuel impurity quantification by pioneering the combination of SAM-DM with LIBS for Th-U MOX analysis, demonstrating strong potential for quality control and safeguards applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":474,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physics B","volume":"132 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00340-026-08624-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physics B","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00340-026-08624-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impurity elements such as lanthanum (La) and neodymium (Nd) in nuclear fuel can adversely impact its efficiency and operational lifespan, making their accurate quantification essential. This study employed laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) to analyze La and Nd in unknown thorium (Th) uranium (U) mixed oxide (Th-U MOX) fuel materials. A novel difference method (DM) was integrated with the standard addition method (SAM) and compared with the conventional extrapolation method (EM). Following a rigorous comparison, three analytical lines for each element were selected: 442.99 nm, 465.55 nm and 545.51 nm for La, and 430.35 nm, 445.15 nm and 529.31 nm for Nd. At 465.55 nm, the SAM-DM approach predicted a La concentration of 530 ppm with a relative error of the mean (REM) of 5.2%, markedly lower than the EM result of 600 ppm (REM = 24.9%). For Nd at 529.31 nm, SAM-DM yielded 475 ppm with 4.5% REM, compared to 550 ppm and 10.6% REM by EM. These results confirm the superior accuracy of SAM-DM over EM, particularly at the selected analytical lines. The two lines were subsequently used to construct optimized calibration curves, yielding limits of detection (LODs) of 155.22 ppm for La and 355.97 ppm for Nd. Furthermore, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) confirmed the robustness of the proposed strategy, with prediction errors generally below 9% except in low concentration cases. Overall, this work establishes a reliable analytical framework for nuclear fuel impurity quantification by pioneering the combination of SAM-DM with LIBS for Th-U MOX analysis, demonstrating strong potential for quality control and safeguards applications.

提高核燃料分析的准确性:用LIBS定量未知Th-U MOX燃料中的La和Nd的新标准添加方法
核燃料中的杂质元素如镧(La)和钕(Nd)会对其效率和使用寿命产生不利影响,因此对其进行准确量化至关重要。本研究采用激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)分析未知钍(Th)铀(U)混合氧化物(Th-U MOX)燃料材料中的La和Nd。将差分法与标准加法法相结合,并与传统的外推法进行了比较。经过严格的比较,每种元素选择了3条分析线:La为442.99 nm、465.55 nm和545.51 nm, Nd为430.35 nm、445.15 nm和529.31 nm。在465.55 nm处,SAM-DM方法预测的La浓度为530 ppm,平均相对误差(REM)为5.2%,明显低于EM结果600 ppm (REM = 24.9%)。对于529.31 nm的Nd, SAM-DM在4.5% REM下产生475 ppm,相比之下,EM产生550 ppm和10.6% REM。这些结果证实了SAM-DM优于EM的准确性,特别是在选定的分析线上。利用这两条线构建优化的校准曲线,La的检出限为155.22 ppm, Nd的检出限为355.97 ppm。此外,留一交叉验证(LOO-CV)证实了该策略的稳健性,除低浓度情况外,预测误差一般在9%以下。总的来说,这项工作通过开创性地将SAM-DM与LIBS结合用于Th-U MOX分析,建立了一个可靠的核燃料杂质定量分析框架,展示了质量控制和保障应用的强大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Physics B
Applied Physics B 物理-光学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
202
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Features publication of experimental and theoretical investigations in applied physics Offers invited reviews in addition to regular papers Coverage includes laser physics, linear and nonlinear optics, ultrafast phenomena, photonic devices, optical and laser materials, quantum optics, laser spectroscopy of atoms, molecules and clusters, and more 94% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again Publishing essential research results in two of the most important areas of applied physics, both Applied Physics sections figure among the top most cited journals in this field. In addition to regular papers Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics features invited reviews. Fields of topical interest are covered by feature issues. The journal also includes a rapid communication section for the speedy publication of important and particularly interesting results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书