{"title":"Assessing global wheat supply security based on a cascading failure model in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict","authors":"Laijun Zhao, Wanying Xie, Huiyong Li, Shuo Sun, Hongru Yi, Lixin Zhou, Pingle Yang","doi":"10.1007/s12571-025-01610-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Russia and Ukraine are critical global wheat producers and exporters, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict is affecting global food security, the magnitude and outcome of its impact remain uncertain. To provide insights, we constructed an international wheat trade network based on the complex network theory and improved the under-load cascading failure model by incorporating trade preferences and national response strategies. By simulating the effects of halted wheat exports from Russia and Ukraine on wheat supplies during each round of cascading transmission, we analysed the propagation of supply shocks and identified vulnerable regions and key alternative exporters during the cascading process. We established a network resilience index to assess the impact on the wheat trade network and conducted a sensitivity analysis of network resilience under different Russian and Ukrainian export scenarios to identify the factors that determine resilience. We found that all regions within the global wheat trade network were affected by supply shocks under cascading effects. China, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States can serve as alternative sources after Russia and Ukraine halt their wheat trade, whereas Indonesia, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, and Tunisia are likely to halt exports due to an inability to meet minimum domestic consumption under multiple scenarios. Our results indicate that vulnerable countries, particularly low- and middle-income nations in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, should enhance interregional wheat trade connectivity, prioritize diversifying their wheat import sources, establish emergency grain reserves, and enhance domestic self-sufficiency to better cope with future supply shocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"18 1","pages":"7 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-025-01610-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Russia and Ukraine are critical global wheat producers and exporters, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict is affecting global food security, the magnitude and outcome of its impact remain uncertain. To provide insights, we constructed an international wheat trade network based on the complex network theory and improved the under-load cascading failure model by incorporating trade preferences and national response strategies. By simulating the effects of halted wheat exports from Russia and Ukraine on wheat supplies during each round of cascading transmission, we analysed the propagation of supply shocks and identified vulnerable regions and key alternative exporters during the cascading process. We established a network resilience index to assess the impact on the wheat trade network and conducted a sensitivity analysis of network resilience under different Russian and Ukrainian export scenarios to identify the factors that determine resilience. We found that all regions within the global wheat trade network were affected by supply shocks under cascading effects. China, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States can serve as alternative sources after Russia and Ukraine halt their wheat trade, whereas Indonesia, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, and Tunisia are likely to halt exports due to an inability to meet minimum domestic consumption under multiple scenarios. Our results indicate that vulnerable countries, particularly low- and middle-income nations in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, should enhance interregional wheat trade connectivity, prioritize diversifying their wheat import sources, establish emergency grain reserves, and enhance domestic self-sufficiency to better cope with future supply shocks.
期刊介绍:
Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches.
Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet.
From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas:
Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition
Global food potential and global food production
Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs:
§ Climate, climate variability, and climate change
§ Desertification and flooding
§ Natural disasters
§ Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production
§ Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production
The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption.
Nutrition, food quality and food safety.
Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs:
§ Land, agricultural and food policy
§ International relations and trade
§ Access to food
§ Financial policy
§ Wars and ethnic unrest
Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.