Investigating the clinical outcomes of prolonged versus intermittent infusion of meropenem in critically ill pediatric patients: a randomized double-blind single-center study

IF 4.5 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rania Saad Mahmoud, Maher Mukhtar Ahmed, Sahar Badr Hassan, Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Abdel-Latif
{"title":"Investigating the clinical outcomes of prolonged versus intermittent infusion of meropenem in critically ill pediatric patients: a randomized double-blind single-center study","authors":"Rania Saad Mahmoud,&nbsp;Maher Mukhtar Ahmed,&nbsp;Sahar Badr Hassan,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Abdel-Latif","doi":"10.1186/s43094-026-00935-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Optimal antibiotic dosing strategies, such as prolonged infusion (PI), are hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients by maximizing time above the minimum inhibitory concentration. This prospective study aimed to evaluate whether PI of meropenem enhances clinical outcomes and reduces mortality compared to standard intermittent infusion (II) in pediatric patients diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, double-blind, randomized, clinical study was conducted in PICU between May 2019 and November 2019 aimed to evaluate whether PI of meropenem enhances clinical outcomes and reduces mortality in pediatric patients diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis. Eligible patients with culture-negative sepsis were assigned to receive meropenem as either a 3-h PI or a 30-min II administered at a dose of 60 mg/kg/day every 8 h. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement that was defined as a reduction in the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score on the 7th day of meropenem therapy. Secondary outcomes included PICU mortality, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and length of stay in the PICU.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (age, gender, CRP, and pre-treatment pSOFA score). By the 7th day of meropenem therapy, the PI group showed greater clinical improvement, as evidenced by a significantly lower pSOFA score compared to the II group [(median pSOFA score: 1; IQR (4)] versus [(median pSOFA score: 4; IQR: (9.75)] in II group (<i>p</i> = 0.008). The 14-day mortality rate in the PICU was lower among patients receiving PI compared to those treated with II (24.2% vs 57.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). CRP showed a greater reduction in the PI compared to the II group (35% vs 105.25%, <i>p</i> = 0.028). Both groups did not differ significantly concerning PICU length of stay (<i>p</i> = 0.104). The ∆pSOFA score showed excellent predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.946) for early treatment response in critically ill pediatric patients, with a cutoff of − 2.5 yielding high sensitivity and specificity. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.026), highlighting the impact of treatment strategy on patient outcomes.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PI of meropenem was associated with enhanced clinical improvement and reduced mortality rates in pediatric patients with culture-negative sepsis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s43094-026-00935-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-026-00935-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Optimal antibiotic dosing strategies, such as prolonged infusion (PI), are hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients by maximizing time above the minimum inhibitory concentration. This prospective study aimed to evaluate whether PI of meropenem enhances clinical outcomes and reduces mortality compared to standard intermittent infusion (II) in pediatric patients diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Methods

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, clinical study was conducted in PICU between May 2019 and November 2019 aimed to evaluate whether PI of meropenem enhances clinical outcomes and reduces mortality in pediatric patients diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis. Eligible patients with culture-negative sepsis were assigned to receive meropenem as either a 3-h PI or a 30-min II administered at a dose of 60 mg/kg/day every 8 h. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement that was defined as a reduction in the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score on the 7th day of meropenem therapy. Secondary outcomes included PICU mortality, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and length of stay in the PICU.

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (age, gender, CRP, and pre-treatment pSOFA score). By the 7th day of meropenem therapy, the PI group showed greater clinical improvement, as evidenced by a significantly lower pSOFA score compared to the II group [(median pSOFA score: 1; IQR (4)] versus [(median pSOFA score: 4; IQR: (9.75)] in II group (p = 0.008). The 14-day mortality rate in the PICU was lower among patients receiving PI compared to those treated with II (24.2% vs 57.1%, p < 0.001). CRP showed a greater reduction in the PI compared to the II group (35% vs 105.25%, p = 0.028). Both groups did not differ significantly concerning PICU length of stay (p = 0.104). The ∆pSOFA score showed excellent predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.946) for early treatment response in critically ill pediatric patients, with a cutoff of − 2.5 yielding high sensitivity and specificity. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.026), highlighting the impact of treatment strategy on patient outcomes.

Conclusion

PI of meropenem was associated with enhanced clinical improvement and reduced mortality rates in pediatric patients with culture-negative sepsis.

研究危重儿科患者长期输注美罗培南与间歇输注美罗培南的临床结果:一项随机双盲单中心研究
假设最佳抗生素给药策略,如延长输注(PI),可以通过最大化最低抑制浓度以上的时间来改善危重患者的临床结果。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)诊断为培养阴性脓毒症的儿科患者中,美罗培南的PI与标准间歇输注(II)相比,是否能提高临床结果并降低死亡率。方法2019年5月至11月在PICU进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、临床研究,旨在评估美罗培南的PI是否能改善培养阴性脓毒症患儿的临床结局并降低死亡率。符合条件的培养阴性脓毒症患者被分配接受美罗培南作为3小时PI或30分钟II,剂量为60mg /kg/天,每8小时给药。主要终点是临床改善,定义为在美罗培南治疗第7天儿科顺序器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)评分降低。次要结局包括PICU死亡率、c反应蛋白(CRP)水平和PICU住院时间。结果两组患者的基线特征(年龄、性别、CRP和治疗前pSOFA评分)具有可比性。到美罗培南治疗第7天,PI组的临床改善更大,pSOFA评分明显低于II组[(pSOFA评分中位数:1;IQR (4)], II组[(pSOFA评分中位数:4;IQR: (9.75)] (p = 0.008)。PICU内接受PI治疗的患者14天死亡率低于接受II治疗的患者(24.2% vs 57.1%, p < 0.001)。与II组相比,CRP显示PI降低幅度更大(35% vs 105.25%, p = 0.028)。两组PICU住院时间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.104)。∆pSOFA评分对危重儿科患者早期治疗反应的预测准确性极好(AUC = 0.946),截止值为- 2.5,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,两组患者的生存率有统计学意义(log-rank p = 0.026),突出了治疗策略对患者预后的影响。结论美罗培南可提高培养阴性脓毒症患儿的临床改善和降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书