Review and Comparison of Methods for Vibration Qualification Testing

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
M. Behling, M. S. Allen, R. Mayes, W. J. DeLima
{"title":"Review and Comparison of Methods for Vibration Qualification Testing","authors":"M. Behling,&nbsp;M. S. Allen,&nbsp;R. Mayes,&nbsp;W. J. DeLima","doi":"10.1007/s40799-025-00839-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vibration qualification tests have been used for decades to ensure that components will perform reliably in their operational environments. Sequential Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) testing became standard in the late 1940s due to its simplicity and repeatability. While this method remains useful, advances in shakers, vibration controllers, data acquisition, and modeling now allow for more accurate testing in many cases. This paper reviews traditional dynamic environment testing methods alongside recent advancements aimed at improving test accuracy. Approaches are categorized into two groups: those using enveloped environments, and those based on actual measured environments. SDOF testing remains effective for certain components and applications involving enveloped environments, yet it has significant limitations that are discussed. Methods are reviewed that seek to enhance SDOF testing, including a simulated case study that demonstrates how force limiting can prevent over-testing when precise environmental data is unavailable. For cases where the true environment is known, we derive conditions for globally accurate response reconstruction using principles from the Hurty / Craig-Bampton substructuring technique and modal analysis. Two frameworks are introduced; one is for systems with a few discrete interfaces between the device under test (DUT) and its support structure, and the other is for systems with continuous or more complicated interfaces. These frameworks are applied to current test methods, including SDOF, 3DOF, 6DOF, and Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT), to evaluate their accuracy in replicating real-world environments. A second set of case studies supports these findings, showing that while IMMAT offers the highest accuracy when framework conditions are met, 6DOF testing provides a practical balance between complexity and performance. The review paper concludes with a summary of key challenges in dynamic environment testing and highlights areas for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":553,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Techniques","volume":"50 1","pages":"23 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40799-025-00839-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vibration qualification tests have been used for decades to ensure that components will perform reliably in their operational environments. Sequential Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) testing became standard in the late 1940s due to its simplicity and repeatability. While this method remains useful, advances in shakers, vibration controllers, data acquisition, and modeling now allow for more accurate testing in many cases. This paper reviews traditional dynamic environment testing methods alongside recent advancements aimed at improving test accuracy. Approaches are categorized into two groups: those using enveloped environments, and those based on actual measured environments. SDOF testing remains effective for certain components and applications involving enveloped environments, yet it has significant limitations that are discussed. Methods are reviewed that seek to enhance SDOF testing, including a simulated case study that demonstrates how force limiting can prevent over-testing when precise environmental data is unavailable. For cases where the true environment is known, we derive conditions for globally accurate response reconstruction using principles from the Hurty / Craig-Bampton substructuring technique and modal analysis. Two frameworks are introduced; one is for systems with a few discrete interfaces between the device under test (DUT) and its support structure, and the other is for systems with continuous or more complicated interfaces. These frameworks are applied to current test methods, including SDOF, 3DOF, 6DOF, and Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT), to evaluate their accuracy in replicating real-world environments. A second set of case studies supports these findings, showing that while IMMAT offers the highest accuracy when framework conditions are met, 6DOF testing provides a practical balance between complexity and performance. The review paper concludes with a summary of key challenges in dynamic environment testing and highlights areas for future research.

振动鉴定试验方法综述与比较
振动鉴定测试已经使用了几十年,以确保部件在其操作环境中可靠地工作。顺序单自由度(SDOF)测试由于其简单性和可重复性在20世纪40年代后期成为标准。虽然这种方法仍然有用,但激振器、振动控制器、数据采集和建模方面的进步现在允许在许多情况下进行更精确的测试。本文综述了传统的动态环境测试方法以及旨在提高测试精度的最新进展。方法分为两类:使用封闭环境的方法和基于实际测量环境的方法。SDOF测试对于涉及封闭环境的某些组件和应用程序仍然是有效的,但是它具有我们所讨论的重大限制。本文回顾了旨在加强SDOF测试的方法,包括一个模拟案例研究,该研究表明,在无法获得精确的环境数据时,力限制如何防止过度测试。对于已知真实环境的情况,我们使用Hurty / Craig-Bampton子结构技术和模态分析的原理推导出全局精确响应重建的条件。介绍了两个框架;一种是针对被测设备与其支撑结构之间具有少量离散接口的系统,另一种是针对具有连续或更复杂接口的系统。这些框架应用于当前的测试方法,包括SDOF、3DOF、6DOF和阻抗匹配多轴测试(IMMAT),以评估它们在复制真实环境中的准确性。第二组案例研究支持了这些发现,表明当满足框架条件时,IMMAT提供了最高的准确性,而6DOF测试在复杂性和性能之间提供了一个实际的平衡。本文总结了动态环境测试的主要挑战,并强调了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Techniques
Experimental Techniques 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Techniques is a bimonthly interdisciplinary publication of the Society for Experimental Mechanics focusing on the development, application and tutorial of experimental mechanics techniques. The purpose for Experimental Techniques is to promote pedagogical, technical and practical advancements in experimental mechanics while supporting the Society''s mission and commitment to interdisciplinary application, research and development, education, and active promotion of experimental methods to: - Increase the knowledge of physical phenomena - Further the understanding of the behavior of materials, structures, and systems - Provide the necessary physical observations necessary to improve and assess new analytical and computational approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书