Comments on the Paper “Fundamental Scaling of Adiabatic Compression of Field Reversed Configuration Thermonuclear Fusion Plasmas”

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
K. Lackner, R. Burhenn, S. Fietz, A. v. Müller, J. Ball
{"title":"Comments on the Paper “Fundamental Scaling of Adiabatic Compression of Field Reversed Configuration Thermonuclear Fusion Plasmas”","authors":"K. Lackner,&nbsp;R. Burhenn,&nbsp;S. Fietz,&nbsp;A. v. Müller,&nbsp;J. Ball","doi":"10.1007/s10894-026-00554-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a recent paper Kirtley and Milroy [D. Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. of Fusion Energy (2023) 42:30] discuss the Helion concept for a pulsed reactor, in which two supersonic field-reversed configurations (FRCs) merge and the resulting plasmoid is adiabatically compressed to fusion conditions. Using D-He3 as fuel this would allow for efficient electromagnetic energy conversion during the subsequent expansion phase. Essential for their very promising projections of energy gain is the assumed large temperature ratio between ions and electrons (<span>\\(\\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\\approx\\:10\\)</span>) resulting initially from the supersonic plasmoid collision and the following adiabatic compression. For reactor-relevant conditions, however, the collisional ion to electron power transfer exceeds the fusion power by more than an order of magnitude at <span>\\(\\:{T}_{i}\\)</span>=100 keV (and by over two orders at <span>\\(\\:{T}_{i}\\)</span>=40 keV). Even if this exchange does not change total pressure, it rapidly erodes <span>\\(\\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\\gg\\:1\\)</span> and causes the time-integrated fusion energy yield to fall well below values inferred from the initial, non-equilibrated state. While this does not preclude a D-He3 FRC reactor our analysis implies much tighter requirements on plasma lifetime, anomalous losses, and direct-conversion efficiency than suggested in D. Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. of Fusion Energy (2023) 42:30.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fusion Energy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10894-026-00554-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fusion Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-026-00554-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent paper Kirtley and Milroy [D. Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. of Fusion Energy (2023) 42:30] discuss the Helion concept for a pulsed reactor, in which two supersonic field-reversed configurations (FRCs) merge and the resulting plasmoid is adiabatically compressed to fusion conditions. Using D-He3 as fuel this would allow for efficient electromagnetic energy conversion during the subsequent expansion phase. Essential for their very promising projections of energy gain is the assumed large temperature ratio between ions and electrons (\(\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\approx\:10\)) resulting initially from the supersonic plasmoid collision and the following adiabatic compression. For reactor-relevant conditions, however, the collisional ion to electron power transfer exceeds the fusion power by more than an order of magnitude at \(\:{T}_{i}\)=100 keV (and by over two orders at \(\:{T}_{i}\)=40 keV). Even if this exchange does not change total pressure, it rapidly erodes \(\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\gg\:1\) and causes the time-integrated fusion energy yield to fall well below values inferred from the initial, non-equilibrated state. While this does not preclude a D-He3 FRC reactor our analysis implies much tighter requirements on plasma lifetime, anomalous losses, and direct-conversion efficiency than suggested in D. Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. of Fusion Energy (2023) 42:30.

对“场反转组态热核聚变等离子体绝热压缩的基本尺度”一文的评论
在最近的一篇论文中,科特利和米罗伊[D。Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. [j] .聚变能(2023)42:30]讨论了脉冲反应堆的Helion概念,其中两个超音速场反转结构(FRCs)合并并且产生的等离子体流被绝热压缩到聚变条件。使用D-He3作为燃料,这将允许在随后的膨胀阶段进行有效的电磁能量转换。他们非常有希望的能量增益预测的关键是假设离子和电子之间的大温度比(\(\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\approx\:10\)),最初是由超音速等离子体碰撞和随后的绝热压缩产生的。然而,对于与反应堆相关的条件,在\(\:{T}_{i}\) =100 keV时,碰撞离子到电子的功率转移超过聚变功率一个数量级以上(在\(\:{T}_{i}\) =40 keV时超过两个数量级)。即使这种交换不改变总压力,它也会迅速侵蚀\(\:{T}_{i}/{T}_{e}\gg\:1\),并导致时间积分聚变能产量远远低于从初始非平衡状态推断出来的值。虽然这并不排除D-He3 FRC反应堆,但我们的分析表明,与D. Kirtley, R. Milroy, J. of Fusion Energy(2023) 42:30所建议的相比,对等离子体寿命、异常损耗和直接转换效率的要求要严格得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fusion Energy
Journal of Fusion Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fusion Energy features original research contributions and review papers examining and the development and enhancing the knowledge base of thermonuclear fusion as a potential power source. It is designed to serve as a journal of record for the publication of original research results in fundamental and applied physics, applied science and technological development. The journal publishes qualified papers based on peer reviews. This journal also provides a forum for discussing broader policies and strategies that have played, and will continue to play, a crucial role in fusion programs. In keeping with this theme, readers will find articles covering an array of important matters concerning strategy and program direction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书