Effect of duration of load on shear performance of wood parallel to the grain direction using tensile shear testing

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Kaito Yamagata, Makoto Nakatani, Takuro Mori
{"title":"Effect of duration of load on shear performance of wood parallel to the grain direction using tensile shear testing","authors":"Kaito Yamagata,&nbsp;Makoto Nakatani,&nbsp;Takuro Mori","doi":"10.1007/s00226-026-01757-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>High-strength joints are increasingly used in timber structures to take advantage of the shear properties of wood. Therefore, understanding the long-term shear performance is essential. In this study, the long-term shear behavior of timber was evaluated using the tensile-shear test method. A duration of load (DOL) test was conducted to assess shear performance parallel to the grain under sustained loading. The test was carried out at loading levels ranging from 70% to 90%. The obtained strength modification factors as well as duration of load coefficients were greater than those specified in the current Japanese timber design standards, indicating that the code-specified values are conservative. In other words, the existing provisions ensure safety margins relative to the actual performance observed in the test. These results satisfy the requirements of the Japanese design code and are considered applicable to international design frame works, demonstrating the global relevance of the findings. The results indicate that the deformation at failure tends to converge at approximately 0.3 mm. A correlation was observed between deformation and environmental conditions, with the specimens loaded in April (<i>n</i> = 2) demonstrating greater deformation than the loaded in October (<i>n</i> = 4). The strength modification factor was determined to be 0.67, which is considered a safe value compared to the current standard of 0.55. This result is consistent with values reported in the previous study involving creep limit test study.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":810,"journal":{"name":"Wood Science and Technology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00226-026-01757-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-026-01757-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-strength joints are increasingly used in timber structures to take advantage of the shear properties of wood. Therefore, understanding the long-term shear performance is essential. In this study, the long-term shear behavior of timber was evaluated using the tensile-shear test method. A duration of load (DOL) test was conducted to assess shear performance parallel to the grain under sustained loading. The test was carried out at loading levels ranging from 70% to 90%. The obtained strength modification factors as well as duration of load coefficients were greater than those specified in the current Japanese timber design standards, indicating that the code-specified values are conservative. In other words, the existing provisions ensure safety margins relative to the actual performance observed in the test. These results satisfy the requirements of the Japanese design code and are considered applicable to international design frame works, demonstrating the global relevance of the findings. The results indicate that the deformation at failure tends to converge at approximately 0.3 mm. A correlation was observed between deformation and environmental conditions, with the specimens loaded in April (n = 2) demonstrating greater deformation than the loaded in October (n = 4). The strength modification factor was determined to be 0.67, which is considered a safe value compared to the current standard of 0.55. This result is consistent with values reported in the previous study involving creep limit test study.

用拉伸剪切试验研究荷载持续时间对平行于木纹方向的木材剪切性能的影响
为了充分利用木材的抗剪性能,高强度接头越来越多地应用于木结构中。因此,了解长期剪切性能至关重要。本研究采用拉剪试验方法对木材的长期抗剪性能进行了评价。荷载持续时间(DOL)试验是为了评估在持续荷载下平行于颗粒的剪切性能。试验是在70%到90%的负荷水平下进行的。得到的强度修正系数和荷载持续时间系数均大于日本现行木材设计标准的规定值,说明规范规定的数值是保守的。换句话说,现有的规定确保了相对于测试中观察到的实际性能的安全边际。这些结果满足日本设计规范的要求,并被认为适用于国际设计框架工程,表明了研究结果的全球相关性。结果表明:破坏时的变形在0.3 mm左右趋于收敛;观察到变形与环境条件之间存在相关性,4月份加载的试件(n = 2)比10月份加载的试件(n = 4)表现出更大的变形。强度修正系数被确定为0.67,与目前的标准0.55相比,这被认为是一个安全值。这一结果与以往蠕变极限试验研究的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood Science and Technology
Wood Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wood Science and Technology publishes original scientific research results and review papers covering the entire field of wood material science, wood components and wood based products. Subjects are wood biology and wood quality, wood physics and physical technologies, wood chemistry and chemical technologies. Latest advances in areas such as cell wall and wood formation; structural and chemical composition of wood and wood composites and their property relations; physical, mechanical and chemical characterization and relevant methodological developments, and microbiological degradation of wood and wood based products are reported. Topics related to wood technology include machining, gluing, and finishing, composite technology, wood modification, wood mechanics, creep and rheology, and the conversion of wood into pulp and biorefinery products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书