Parenting through COVID-19 Related Adversity: A Qualitative Study using a Cognitive-Behavioral Framework

IF 2.1
Salena King Coughlan, Lana O. Beasley, Jens E. Jespersen, Jennifer Hays-Grudo, Julie Kable, Claire Coles, Christina Chambers, Ludmila Bakhireva, Lynn Singer, Julie M. Croff, Amanda Morris
{"title":"Parenting through COVID-19 Related Adversity: A Qualitative Study using a Cognitive-Behavioral Framework","authors":"Salena King Coughlan,&nbsp;Lana O. Beasley,&nbsp;Jens E. Jespersen,&nbsp;Jennifer Hays-Grudo,&nbsp;Julie Kable,&nbsp;Claire Coles,&nbsp;Christina Chambers,&nbsp;Ludmila Bakhireva,&nbsp;Lynn Singer,&nbsp;Julie M. Croff,&nbsp;Amanda Morris","doi":"10.1007/s42844-026-00196-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic was a source of global prolonged, multilayered adversity that caused heightened levels of social, emotional, and psychological stressors. It is imperative to understand the heightened stressors and protective factors that caregivers experienced during the pandemic in order to better contextualize treatment for caregivers, their children, and families today. Research has shown that caregiver and child well-being are interconnected. Indicating that the impacts of the pandemic on caregivers as individuals likely contributed to overall child well-being in the context of changes in parental thoughts, feelings, and actions. Therefore, the primary objectives of the current study were to determine, from a qualitative perspective, positive and negative parenting behavioral changes throughout various levels of stay in place orders attributed to the pandemic and how these experiences may fit within the cognitive behavioral framework. A sample of caregivers (<i>N</i> = 67) across five states were identified by previous studies, social media advertisements, community events, and medical clinics. It is important to note that the caregivers in the current sample were predominantly white and highly educated. Caregivers reported perceived positive and negative parenting changes experienced during the pandemic (child age range = 6 weeks to 4 years). Fewer than one-third of participants described negative parenting changes, such as harsher parenting practices or increased irritability. In contrast, over half of caregivers described positive changes, including increased quality time, stronger feelings of attachment, greater patience, and flexibility. These findings emerged from thematic analysis and reflect the most frequently discussed patterns across interviews. This exploratory study acknowledges the difficulties of parenting during a pandemic while also identifying and emphasizing the strategies families used to adapt.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-026-00196-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was a source of global prolonged, multilayered adversity that caused heightened levels of social, emotional, and psychological stressors. It is imperative to understand the heightened stressors and protective factors that caregivers experienced during the pandemic in order to better contextualize treatment for caregivers, their children, and families today. Research has shown that caregiver and child well-being are interconnected. Indicating that the impacts of the pandemic on caregivers as individuals likely contributed to overall child well-being in the context of changes in parental thoughts, feelings, and actions. Therefore, the primary objectives of the current study were to determine, from a qualitative perspective, positive and negative parenting behavioral changes throughout various levels of stay in place orders attributed to the pandemic and how these experiences may fit within the cognitive behavioral framework. A sample of caregivers (N = 67) across five states were identified by previous studies, social media advertisements, community events, and medical clinics. It is important to note that the caregivers in the current sample were predominantly white and highly educated. Caregivers reported perceived positive and negative parenting changes experienced during the pandemic (child age range = 6 weeks to 4 years). Fewer than one-third of participants described negative parenting changes, such as harsher parenting practices or increased irritability. In contrast, over half of caregivers described positive changes, including increased quality time, stronger feelings of attachment, greater patience, and flexibility. These findings emerged from thematic analysis and reflect the most frequently discussed patterns across interviews. This exploratory study acknowledges the difficulties of parenting during a pandemic while also identifying and emphasizing the strategies families used to adapt.

Abstract Image

通过COVID-19相关逆境养育子女:一项使用认知行为框架的定性研究
2019冠状病毒病大流行是全球长期、多层次逆境的根源,导致社会、情感和心理压力加剧。必须了解护理人员在大流行期间经历的压力源和保护因素的增加,以便更好地为护理人员及其子女和家庭提供当今的治疗。研究表明,照顾者和儿童的幸福是相互关联的。这表明,在父母思想、感情和行动发生变化的背景下,大流行对照顾者个人的影响可能有助于儿童的整体福祉。因此,本研究的主要目标是从定性的角度确定,由于大流行导致的不同级别的留守令中积极和消极的育儿行为变化,以及这些经历如何与认知行为框架相适应。通过先前的研究、社交媒体广告、社区活动和医疗诊所,确定了五个州的护理人员样本(N = 67)。值得注意的是,当前样本中的护理人员主要是受过高等教育的白人。照料者报告了在大流行期间感受到的积极和消极的育儿变化(儿童年龄范围= 6周至4岁)。不到三分之一的参与者描述了负面的养育变化,比如更严厉的养育方式或易怒的增加。相比之下,超过一半的护理人员描述了积极的变化,包括增加的优质时间,更强的依恋感,更大的耐心和灵活性。这些发现来自主题分析,反映了访谈中最常讨论的模式。这项探索性研究承认在大流行期间养育子女的困难,同时也确定和强调了家庭用来适应的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书