Response and adaptation of global terrestrial vegetation production to extreme precipitation

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135212
Tianyue Sun , Yuan Zhang , Xiaoming Feng , Bojie Fu , Donggang Guo , Weipeng Wang
{"title":"Response and adaptation of global terrestrial vegetation production to extreme precipitation","authors":"Tianyue Sun ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Feng ,&nbsp;Bojie Fu ,&nbsp;Donggang Guo ,&nbsp;Weipeng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extreme precipitation events (EPEs) are expected to become increasingly frequent and severe in the future. As a critical meteorological factor, extreme precipitation (EPre) strongly regulates ecosystem carbon sequestration, highlighting the need to understand its effects on global terrestrial ecosystems. However, quantitative assessments of how ecosystem carbon sequestration adapts to EPre at the global scale and over the long term are still lacking. To address this issue, we define EPEs using threshold-based methods and extreme climate indices. Using observational data from 29 FLUXNET stations, we employ partial correlation analysis and Random Forest model to systematically quantify the response, adaptation, and recovery of gross primary productivity (GPP) to EPEs. The results demonstrate that: (1) A total of 499 EPEs persisting for more than five days comprised 95% of all identified EPEs. The duration of these EPEs ranged from 5 to 28 days in evergreen needleleaf forest, mixed forest, and deciduous broadleaf forest ecosystems, while woody savannas ecosystems exhibited significantly longer durations. (2) EPre significantly reduced ecosystem carbon sequestration. In most ecosystems (excluding evergreen broadleaf forests and woody savannas), the mean partial correlation coefficient between EPre and GPP was less than −0.66 (p &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, EPre accounted for more than 41% of the observed decline in GPP. (3) Most ecosystems (deciduous broadleaf forests, evergreen broadleaf forests, evergreen needleleaf forests, mixed forests and woody savannas) typically recovered their carbon sequestration capacity within 12 days. The duration of EPEs and vapor pressure deficit during the recovery period were identified as the primary drivers influencing the recovery of GPP. Our findings refine the understanding of diverse ecosystem responses to extreme precipitation and offer a framework for enhancing the simulation of such events in dynamic vegetation models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"671 ","pages":"Article 135212"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169426003094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extreme precipitation events (EPEs) are expected to become increasingly frequent and severe in the future. As a critical meteorological factor, extreme precipitation (EPre) strongly regulates ecosystem carbon sequestration, highlighting the need to understand its effects on global terrestrial ecosystems. However, quantitative assessments of how ecosystem carbon sequestration adapts to EPre at the global scale and over the long term are still lacking. To address this issue, we define EPEs using threshold-based methods and extreme climate indices. Using observational data from 29 FLUXNET stations, we employ partial correlation analysis and Random Forest model to systematically quantify the response, adaptation, and recovery of gross primary productivity (GPP) to EPEs. The results demonstrate that: (1) A total of 499 EPEs persisting for more than five days comprised 95% of all identified EPEs. The duration of these EPEs ranged from 5 to 28 days in evergreen needleleaf forest, mixed forest, and deciduous broadleaf forest ecosystems, while woody savannas ecosystems exhibited significantly longer durations. (2) EPre significantly reduced ecosystem carbon sequestration. In most ecosystems (excluding evergreen broadleaf forests and woody savannas), the mean partial correlation coefficient between EPre and GPP was less than −0.66 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, EPre accounted for more than 41% of the observed decline in GPP. (3) Most ecosystems (deciduous broadleaf forests, evergreen broadleaf forests, evergreen needleleaf forests, mixed forests and woody savannas) typically recovered their carbon sequestration capacity within 12 days. The duration of EPEs and vapor pressure deficit during the recovery period were identified as the primary drivers influencing the recovery of GPP. Our findings refine the understanding of diverse ecosystem responses to extreme precipitation and offer a framework for enhancing the simulation of such events in dynamic vegetation models.
全球陆地植被生产对极端降水的响应与适应
预计未来极端降水事件将变得越来越频繁和严重。作为一个关键的气象因子,极端降水(EPre)对生态系统的碳固存有着强烈的调节作用,这凸显了了解其对全球陆地生态系统影响的必要性。然而,在全球范围内和长期内,生态系统固碳如何适应EPre的定量评估仍然缺乏。为了解决这个问题,我们使用基于阈值的方法和极端气候指数来定义epe。利用29个FLUXNET站点的观测数据,采用偏相关分析和随机森林模型,系统量化了总初级生产力(GPP)对EPEs的响应、适应和恢复。结果表明:(1)持续时间大于5 d的EPEs共有499个,占已鉴定EPEs的95%;常绿针叶林、混交林和落叶阔叶林生态系统的EPEs持续时间为5 ~ 28 d,而木本稀树草原生态系统的EPEs持续时间明显更长。(2) EPre显著降低了生态系统固碳。在大多数生态系统中(不包括常绿阔叶林和木本稀树草原),EPre与GPP的平均偏相关系数小于- 0.66 (p < 0.05)。此外,EPre占GPP下降的41%以上。(3)大多数生态系统(落叶阔叶林、常绿阔叶林、常绿针叶林、混交林和木本稀树草原)的固碳能力通常在12 d内恢复。结果表明,EPEs持续时间和恢复期间的蒸汽压赤字是影响GPP恢复的主要驱动因素。我们的发现完善了对极端降水的不同生态系统响应的理解,并为在动态植被模型中加强此类事件的模拟提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书