Raman Spectroscopy of Protein-Polysaccharide Conjugates: A Comparative Study of Tree-Based Ensemble Models

Oksana A. Mayorova, Mariia S. Saveleva, Ekaterina S. Prikhozhdenko
{"title":"Raman Spectroscopy of Protein-Polysaccharide Conjugates: A Comparative Study of Tree-Based Ensemble Models","authors":"Oksana A. Mayorova, Mariia S. Saveleva, Ekaterina S. Prikhozhdenko","doi":"10.20944/preprints202512.2649.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proteins with additives, especially in small quantities, are of great interest as a subject of a study. Machine learning approaches implemented to Raman spectroscopy data could provide an insight into chemical structure of such mixtures or conjugates. Although, de-cision tree model could be powerful in solving either classification or regression task and could provide accessible predictions, it is prone to overfitting. Ensemble models that implement several decision trees could overcome the determined problem. Five different model types are discussed: RandomForest, GradientBoosting, AdaBoost, Voting, and Stacking. Raman spectroscopy data of whey protein isolate (5 wt. %) with different amounts of hyaluronic acid (0, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 wt. %) were used as datasets. Optimiza-tion established that ensembles of 200 decision trees with a maximum depth of four were optimal. AdaBoostClassifier found to be the most efficient in finding differences between whey protein isolate and its conjugates with hyaluronic acid: 99.5% accuracy, 100% sen-sitivity, and 98.0% specificity. Stacking of RandomForest, GradientBoosting, and Ada-Boost regressors with final estimator of RidgeCV was the most effective approach in the regression task (R2 = 0.963). According to the feature importance plots, the Raman bands that were most influential in predicting the results were 1003 cm-1 (phenylalanine, ring breath), 1206 cm-1 (C–C stretching), 1240 cm-1 (amide III (β-sheet), N−H in-plane bend, C−N stretch), and 1399 cm-1 (aspartic and glutamic acids, C=O stretch of COO−).","PeriodicalId":521283,"journal":{"name":"Preprints.org","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.preprints.org/frontend/manuscript/b29b261a93f39613465b28540ebde738/download_pub","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preprints.org","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.2649.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proteins with additives, especially in small quantities, are of great interest as a subject of a study. Machine learning approaches implemented to Raman spectroscopy data could provide an insight into chemical structure of such mixtures or conjugates. Although, de-cision tree model could be powerful in solving either classification or regression task and could provide accessible predictions, it is prone to overfitting. Ensemble models that implement several decision trees could overcome the determined problem. Five different model types are discussed: RandomForest, GradientBoosting, AdaBoost, Voting, and Stacking. Raman spectroscopy data of whey protein isolate (5 wt. %) with different amounts of hyaluronic acid (0, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 wt. %) were used as datasets. Optimiza-tion established that ensembles of 200 decision trees with a maximum depth of four were optimal. AdaBoostClassifier found to be the most efficient in finding differences between whey protein isolate and its conjugates with hyaluronic acid: 99.5% accuracy, 100% sen-sitivity, and 98.0% specificity. Stacking of RandomForest, GradientBoosting, and Ada-Boost regressors with final estimator of RidgeCV was the most effective approach in the regression task (R2 = 0.963). According to the feature importance plots, the Raman bands that were most influential in predicting the results were 1003 cm-1 (phenylalanine, ring breath), 1206 cm-1 (C–C stretching), 1240 cm-1 (amide III (β-sheet), N−H in-plane bend, C−N stretch), and 1399 cm-1 (aspartic and glutamic acids, C=O stretch of COO−).
蛋白质-多糖缀合物的拉曼光谱:树系系综模型的比较研究
含有添加剂的蛋白质,尤其是少量的添加剂,是研究的重要课题。对拉曼光谱数据实施的机器学习方法可以深入了解此类混合物或共轭物的化学结构。虽然决策树模型在解决分类或回归任务方面可能是强大的,并且可以提供可访问的预测,但它容易过度拟合。实现多个决策树的集成模型可以克服确定性问题。本文讨论了五种不同的模型类型:RandomForest、GradientBoosting、AdaBoost、Voting和Stacking。采用不同透明质酸含量(0、0.1、0.25和0.5 wt. %)的乳清分离蛋白(5 wt. %)的拉曼光谱数据作为数据集。优化结果表明,200棵决策树的最大深度为4的集合是最优的。AdaBoostClassifier发现在发现分离乳清蛋白及其与透明质酸结合物之间的差异时最有效:99.5%的准确性,100%的灵敏度和98.0%的特异性。在回归任务中,RandomForest、GradientBoosting和Ada-Boost回归量与RidgeCV的最终估计量叠加是最有效的方法(R2 = 0.963)。根据特征重要性图,对预测结果影响最大的拉曼谱带分别为1003 cm-1(苯丙氨酸,环呼吸)、1206 cm-1 (C - C拉伸)、1240 cm-1(酰胺III (β-sheet), N−H面内弯曲,C−N拉伸)和1399 cm-1(天冬氨酸和谷氨酸,C=O COO拉伸)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
原料信息
原料厂家
1
22
Sodium salt of hyaluronic acid
68439-86-1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书