Listening performance in background noise and subjective hearing: a comparison among young adults, older adults, and adults with listening difficulties.

Journal of otology Pub Date : 2026-02-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.26599/JOTO.2026.9540045
Yayoi Yamamoto, Yuka Sasame, Chie Obuchi
{"title":"Listening performance in background noise and subjective hearing: a comparison among young adults, older adults, and adults with listening difficulties.","authors":"Yayoi Yamamoto, Yuka Sasame, Chie Obuchi","doi":"10.26599/JOTO.2026.9540045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate subjective and objective listening abilities in noise in young adults, older adults with normal hearing, and adults with listening difficulties (LiD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 20 young adults, 20 older adults with normal hearing, and 20 adults with LiD. All participants underwent pure-tone audiometry and the Hearing in Noise Test-Japanese version (HINT-J) and completed the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups had normal hearing thresholds (125-8,000 Hz). Older adults with normal hearing performed worse on the HINT-J than young adults, while adults with LiD reported greater subjective LiD on the SSQ. No significant correlations were found between HINT-J and SSQ scores with any group. Significant differences were found between groups in terms of both the HINT-J (χ<sup>2</sup>(2)=17.9, p<0.01) and SSQ (χ<sup>2</sup>(2)=38.7, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite normal audiometric thresholds, older adults with normal hearing and adults with LiD experience distinct LiD in noisy environments, highlighting the need for comprehensive assessment beyond traditional audiometry. Future research should focus on developing more sensitive diagnostic tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":94336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otology","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12945654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/JOTO.2026.9540045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate subjective and objective listening abilities in noise in young adults, older adults with normal hearing, and adults with listening difficulties (LiD).

Methods: This study examined 20 young adults, 20 older adults with normal hearing, and 20 adults with LiD. All participants underwent pure-tone audiometry and the Hearing in Noise Test-Japanese version (HINT-J) and completed the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Results: All groups had normal hearing thresholds (125-8,000 Hz). Older adults with normal hearing performed worse on the HINT-J than young adults, while adults with LiD reported greater subjective LiD on the SSQ. No significant correlations were found between HINT-J and SSQ scores with any group. Significant differences were found between groups in terms of both the HINT-J (χ2(2)=17.9, p<0.01) and SSQ (χ2(2)=38.7, p<0.01).

Conclusion: Despite normal audiometric thresholds, older adults with normal hearing and adults with LiD experience distinct LiD in noisy environments, highlighting the need for comprehensive assessment beyond traditional audiometry. Future research should focus on developing more sensitive diagnostic tools.

背景噪音和主观听力下的听力表现:年轻人、老年人和听力困难成年人的比较
目的:探讨青壮年、听力正常老年人和听力困难成人(LiD)在噪声中的主客观听力能力。方法:本研究对20名青年成年人、20名听力正常的老年人和20名听力障碍的成年人进行了调查。所有参与者均接受纯音听力测试和噪音听力测试(日语版),并完成语音、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)。结果:各组听力阈值(125 ~ 8000 Hz)正常。听力正常的老年人在HINT-J上的表现比年轻人差,而听力障碍的成年人在SSQ上的主观听力障碍更大。在任何组中,HINT-J和SSQ得分之间均未发现显著相关性。结论:尽管听力阈值正常,但听力正常的老年人和有听力障碍的成年人在嘈杂环境中经历了不同的听力障碍,这突出了在传统听力测量之外进行综合评估的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于开发更灵敏的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书