Heart Rate Variability in Congenital Heart Disease and Controls Using Wearable Technology and a Health Application Programming Interface—A Cross-sectional Study
Charlotte Schöneburg MSc , Isabel Uphoff MSc , Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz MD , Peter Ewert MD , Jan Müller PhD
{"title":"Heart Rate Variability in Congenital Heart Disease and Controls Using Wearable Technology and a Health Application Programming Interface—A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Charlotte Schöneburg MSc , Isabel Uphoff MSc , Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz MD , Peter Ewert MD , Jan Müller PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With 95% of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) reaching adulthood, the focus has shifted from early mortality to long-term morbidity. Chronic health conditions are associated with increased cardiac and psychological burdens, which could influence autonomic function. This study compares heart rate variability (HRV) levels between adults with CHD and controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between September 2023 and February 2024, 124 adults with CHD (33.7 ± 10.5 years, 47.6% women) and 43 controls (34.3 ± 12.0 years, 44.2% women) participated in a wearable-based physiological assessment. HRV was continuously recorded using Garmin vivosmart 5 for 7 days, with data synchronized via a health application programming interface. The root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) was calculated for day and nighttime based on individual sleep and waking schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with CHD exhibited lower overall rMSSD than controls (CHD: 39.9 [33.6; 48.1] vs controls: 47.0 [39.9; 53.3]; <em>P</em> = 0.001), driven by reduced nighttime rMSSD (CHD: 43.5 [34.5; 55.3] vs controls: 53.1 [47.2; 65.4]; <em>P</em> < 0.001), with no significant daytime differences (CHD: 35.9 [31.8; 41.6] vs controls: 39.0 [32.3; 45.1]; <em>P</em> = 0.212). CHD showed a 17.4% higher HRV at night compared with the day, whereas controls exhibited a 46.4% increase, indicating significantly better autonomic recovery in controls during the night (<em>P</em> < 0.001). In patients, VO<sub>2</sub> peak correlated positively with daytime (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and overall rMSSD (<em>P</em> = 0.017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with CHD appear to have lower overall HRV, driven by decreased nighttime HRV compared with controls. Nighttime HRV is key for understanding recovery, sleep quality, and health. Continuous monitoring via health application programming interfaces could support reliable chronic health assessment and personalized care strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100249,"journal":{"name":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277281292500106X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With 95% of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) reaching adulthood, the focus has shifted from early mortality to long-term morbidity. Chronic health conditions are associated with increased cardiac and psychological burdens, which could influence autonomic function. This study compares heart rate variability (HRV) levels between adults with CHD and controls.
Methods
Between September 2023 and February 2024, 124 adults with CHD (33.7 ± 10.5 years, 47.6% women) and 43 controls (34.3 ± 12.0 years, 44.2% women) participated in a wearable-based physiological assessment. HRV was continuously recorded using Garmin vivosmart 5 for 7 days, with data synchronized via a health application programming interface. The root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) was calculated for day and nighttime based on individual sleep and waking schedules.
Results
Patients with CHD exhibited lower overall rMSSD than controls (CHD: 39.9 [33.6; 48.1] vs controls: 47.0 [39.9; 53.3]; P = 0.001), driven by reduced nighttime rMSSD (CHD: 43.5 [34.5; 55.3] vs controls: 53.1 [47.2; 65.4]; P < 0.001), with no significant daytime differences (CHD: 35.9 [31.8; 41.6] vs controls: 39.0 [32.3; 45.1]; P = 0.212). CHD showed a 17.4% higher HRV at night compared with the day, whereas controls exhibited a 46.4% increase, indicating significantly better autonomic recovery in controls during the night (P < 0.001). In patients, VO2 peak correlated positively with daytime (P < 0.001) and overall rMSSD (P = 0.017).
Conclusions
Patients with CHD appear to have lower overall HRV, driven by decreased nighttime HRV compared with controls. Nighttime HRV is key for understanding recovery, sleep quality, and health. Continuous monitoring via health application programming interfaces could support reliable chronic health assessment and personalized care strategies.