A holistic framework for assessing the uptake potential of EU-funded security research and innovation project results.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2026-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.19711.3
Marcel van der Lee, Clara Peters, Marcel van Berlo, Luis Unzueta, David Ríos, Sirra Toivonen, Gonçalo Cadete, Björn Hoog, Salvatore Vicari, Ernesto La Mattina, Laurynas Adomaitis, Alexei Grinbaum, Hassane Essafi, Souzanna Sofou, Katerina Valouma, Ilias Gkotsis, Nikos Chantavas, Luke Bates, Helen Gibson, Babak Akhgar, Christelle Magimel, Robert Kuch Wesolowski, Anders Åström, Zakarias Subeh, Eleni Darra, Michalis Angelou, Dimitrios Kavallieros, Nicholas Vretos, Theodora Tsikrika, Stefanos Vrochidis
{"title":"A holistic framework for assessing the uptake potential of EU-funded security research and innovation project results.","authors":"Marcel van der Lee, Clara Peters, Marcel van Berlo, Luis Unzueta, David Ríos, Sirra Toivonen, Gonçalo Cadete, Björn Hoog, Salvatore Vicari, Ernesto La Mattina, Laurynas Adomaitis, Alexei Grinbaum, Hassane Essafi, Souzanna Sofou, Katerina Valouma, Ilias Gkotsis, Nikos Chantavas, Luke Bates, Helen Gibson, Babak Akhgar, Christelle Magimel, Robert Kuch Wesolowski, Anders Åström, Zakarias Subeh, Eleni Darra, Michalis Angelou, Dimitrios Kavallieros, Nicholas Vretos, Theodora Tsikrika, Stefanos Vrochidis","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.19711.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) has been adopted since 2014 within the European Union (EU) as a metric to evaluate the maturity of results from EU-funded research and innovation projects. This metric is crucial for distinguishing between innovation actions aimed at early-stage innovations and market-ready solutions. Ideally, EU-funded research and innovation projects should lead to the development of innovative concepts and technologies by EU industries, which in turn enhance security capabilities within EU member states. However, there is a notable challenge: the adoption rate of outcomes from EU-funded security research and innovation projects is not as high as expected. The current TRL maturity assessment method is insufficient in exposing the possible cause of the limited uptake by fully pointing out where the development is lacking. The TRL's limitations include a lack of comprehensive assessment from various perspectives especially in the civil security research and projects, which is necessary to bridge the gap, often referred to as the \"valley of death,\" between project results and their effective adoption. To address these shortcomings, in the MultiRATE EU research project we propose a holistic framework that enhances the TRL scale by adding additional Readiness Levels (RLs) for a more complete evaluation of security projects. These include the Societal RL (SocRL), Security RL (SecRL), Legal, Privacy and Ethical RL (LPERL), Integration RL (IRL), Commercialisation RL (CRL), and Manufacturing RL (MRL). In this open letter, we explain the background of the design considerations of this framework. Our goal is to define and integrate these seven Readiness Level (RL) dimensions and an investment forecasting tool to support policy makers, practitioners, and investors in bridging the \"valley of death\" between research and adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12949380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19711.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) has been adopted since 2014 within the European Union (EU) as a metric to evaluate the maturity of results from EU-funded research and innovation projects. This metric is crucial for distinguishing between innovation actions aimed at early-stage innovations and market-ready solutions. Ideally, EU-funded research and innovation projects should lead to the development of innovative concepts and technologies by EU industries, which in turn enhance security capabilities within EU member states. However, there is a notable challenge: the adoption rate of outcomes from EU-funded security research and innovation projects is not as high as expected. The current TRL maturity assessment method is insufficient in exposing the possible cause of the limited uptake by fully pointing out where the development is lacking. The TRL's limitations include a lack of comprehensive assessment from various perspectives especially in the civil security research and projects, which is necessary to bridge the gap, often referred to as the "valley of death," between project results and their effective adoption. To address these shortcomings, in the MultiRATE EU research project we propose a holistic framework that enhances the TRL scale by adding additional Readiness Levels (RLs) for a more complete evaluation of security projects. These include the Societal RL (SocRL), Security RL (SecRL), Legal, Privacy and Ethical RL (LPERL), Integration RL (IRL), Commercialisation RL (CRL), and Manufacturing RL (MRL). In this open letter, we explain the background of the design considerations of this framework. Our goal is to define and integrate these seven Readiness Level (RL) dimensions and an investment forecasting tool to support policy makers, practitioners, and investors in bridging the "valley of death" between research and adoption.

评估欧盟资助的安全研究和创新项目成果的吸收潜力的整体框架。
自2014年以来,技术就绪水平(TRL)在欧盟(EU)内被采用,作为评估欧盟资助的研究和创新项目成果成熟度的指标。这一指标对于区分针对早期创新的创新行动和面向市场的解决方案至关重要。理想情况下,欧盟资助的研究和创新项目应该导致欧盟工业创新概念和技术的发展,这反过来又增强了欧盟成员国的安全能力。然而,有一个显著的挑战:欧盟资助的安全研究和创新项目成果的采用率并不像预期的那么高。现有的TRL成熟度评价方法,在充分指出发展不足的地方,暴露出吸收有限的可能原因方面存在不足。TRL的局限性包括缺乏从各个角度进行的全面评估,特别是在民事安全研究和项目中,这是弥合项目成果与其有效采用之间的差距(通常被称为“死亡之谷”)所必需的。为了解决这些缺点,在MultiRATE欧盟研究项目中,我们提出了一个整体框架,通过增加额外的准备水平(RLs)来提高TRL规模,以便对安全项目进行更完整的评估。这些研究包括社会研究(SocRL)、安全研究(SecRL)、法律、隐私和道德研究(LPERL)、集成研究(IRL)、商业化研究(CRL)和制造研究(MRL)。在这封公开信中,我们解释了这个框架的设计背景。我们的目标是定义和整合这七个准备程度(RL)维度和一个投资预测工具,以支持政策制定者、从业者和投资者在研究和采用之间架起一座“死亡之谷”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书