Multicenter study protocol on clinical, environmental, and economic outcomes of hybrid versus disposable surgical trays (project rEUsable).

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY
International Journal of Surgery Protocols Pub Date : 2026-02-04 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SP9.0000000000000064
Florine I de Haes, Marit van Barreveld, Niek H Sperna Weiland, Wouter Hehenkamp, Marianne Dougle, Anne C van der Eijk, Oliver Findl, Monique Chambon, Frenk van Harreveld, Dorien A Salentijn
{"title":"Multicenter study protocol on clinical, environmental, and economic outcomes of hybrid versus disposable surgical trays (project rEUsable).","authors":"Florine I de Haes, Marit van Barreveld, Niek H Sperna Weiland, Wouter Hehenkamp, Marianne Dougle, Anne C van der Eijk, Oliver Findl, Monique Chambon, Frenk van Harreveld, Dorien A Salentijn","doi":"10.1097/SP9.0000000000000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate change threatens global health, while health care contributes significantly to emissions and waste. In the Netherlands, the sector produces 7% of national CO₂ emissions and 4% of waste. Operating rooms account for 20%-30% of hospital waste, mainly from disposable surgical trays. Reusable trays could reduce this impact, but adoption is hindered by financial and behavioral barriers. A system-wide switch could lower costs through scale effects, yet evidence on environmental and financial feasibility remains limited. This multicenter study compares the environmental impact and costs of hybrid (including <i>reusable</i> drapes and gowns) versus disposable procedure trays using Life Cycle Assessment and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Environmental impact across 17 categories will be monetized, integrating sustainability into economic evaluation to inform health policy decisions. Results will be reported from an EU perspective. Data from three Dutch hospitals will be collected on tray use, costs, and acceptance among health care professionals. The study analyses 3 × 150 surgical cases to assess sustainability, economic feasibility, and implementability. Key deliverables include developing sustainable procedure trays and a piloted method to integrate environmental aspects into HTA, supporting sustainable health care innovation. The project will also produce an EU policy brief to guide hospitals in adopting reusable trays, highlighting environmental and economic benefits. Finally, it will provide insights into promoting acceptance and adoption of reusables to advance sustainable clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"30 1","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12944117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SP9.0000000000000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change threatens global health, while health care contributes significantly to emissions and waste. In the Netherlands, the sector produces 7% of national CO₂ emissions and 4% of waste. Operating rooms account for 20%-30% of hospital waste, mainly from disposable surgical trays. Reusable trays could reduce this impact, but adoption is hindered by financial and behavioral barriers. A system-wide switch could lower costs through scale effects, yet evidence on environmental and financial feasibility remains limited. This multicenter study compares the environmental impact and costs of hybrid (including reusable drapes and gowns) versus disposable procedure trays using Life Cycle Assessment and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Environmental impact across 17 categories will be monetized, integrating sustainability into economic evaluation to inform health policy decisions. Results will be reported from an EU perspective. Data from three Dutch hospitals will be collected on tray use, costs, and acceptance among health care professionals. The study analyses 3 × 150 surgical cases to assess sustainability, economic feasibility, and implementability. Key deliverables include developing sustainable procedure trays and a piloted method to integrate environmental aspects into HTA, supporting sustainable health care innovation. The project will also produce an EU policy brief to guide hospitals in adopting reusable trays, highlighting environmental and economic benefits. Finally, it will provide insights into promoting acceptance and adoption of reusables to advance sustainable clinical practices.

混合与一次性手术托盘的临床、环境和经济结果的多中心研究方案(项目可重复使用)。
气候变化威胁着全球健康,而医疗保健在很大程度上造成了排放和浪费。在荷兰,该行业产生了全国7%的二氧化碳排放量和4%的废物。手术室占医院废弃物的20%-30%,主要来自一次性手术托盘。可重复使用的托盘可以减少这种影响,但采用受到经济和行为障碍的阻碍。全系统的转换可以通过规模效应降低成本,但关于环境和财务可行性的证据仍然有限。这项多中心研究使用生命周期评估和健康技术评估(HTA)比较了混合(包括可重复使用的窗帘和长袍)与一次性手术托盘的环境影响和成本。17个类别的环境影响将货币化,将可持续性纳入经济评价,为卫生政策决策提供信息。结果将从欧盟的角度报告。将收集荷兰三家医院关于托盘使用、费用和卫生保健专业人员接受程度的数据。本研究分析了3 × 150例手术病例,以评估可持续性、经济可行性和可实施性。主要成果包括开发可持续的程序托盘和将环境因素纳入HTA的试点方法,支持可持续的卫生保健创新。该项目还将编制一份欧盟政策简报,指导医院采用可重复使用的托盘,突出环境和经济效益。最后,它将为促进可重复使用材料的接受和采用提供见解,以促进可持续的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书