Efficacy, safety and dosing of intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 hours for ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2026.2639362
Bassel Alrabadi, Yousef Alghzawi, Hasan I Mater, Natalie Bandak, Alwaleed Emad Alshakshir, Raghad Saleh, Hadeel A Alkayed
{"title":"Efficacy, safety and dosing of intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 hours for ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bassel Alrabadi, Yousef Alghzawi, Hasan I Mater, Natalie Bandak, Alwaleed Emad Alshakshir, Raghad Saleh, Hadeel A Alkayed","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2026.2639362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dosing of intravenous alteplase administered beyond the conventional 4.5-hour therapeutic window in adults with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2025 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset, including wake-up and imaging-selected strokes. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Outcomes included functional recovery, functional independence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Sensitivity analyses and Bayesian meta-analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies comprising 2,050 patients met the inclusion criteria. Late administration of alteplase was associated with improved functional outcomes, including higher rates of favorable modified Rankin Scale scores (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51) and functional independence (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28). Treatment was associated with an increased risk of sICH (RR 4.67, 95% CI 1.85-11.76), while mortality did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.73). Bayesian analysis demonstrated consistent functional benefit with standard-dose alteplase (0.9 mg/kg), whereas reduced-dose regimens did not show consistent efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset is associated with improved functional outcomes in selected patients, despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and no significant effect on mortality. These findings support the use of extended-window thrombolysis when guided by appropriate clinical or imaging-based selection criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"823-833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2026.2639362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dosing of intravenous alteplase administered beyond the conventional 4.5-hour therapeutic window in adults with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2025 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset, including wake-up and imaging-selected strokes. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Outcomes included functional recovery, functional independence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Sensitivity analyses and Bayesian meta-analyses were also performed.

Results: Ten studies comprising 2,050 patients met the inclusion criteria. Late administration of alteplase was associated with improved functional outcomes, including higher rates of favorable modified Rankin Scale scores (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51) and functional independence (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28). Treatment was associated with an increased risk of sICH (RR 4.67, 95% CI 1.85-11.76), while mortality did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.73). Bayesian analysis demonstrated consistent functional benefit with standard-dose alteplase (0.9 mg/kg), whereas reduced-dose regimens did not show consistent efficacy.

Conclusion: Intravenous alteplase administered beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset is associated with improved functional outcomes in selected patients, despite an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and no significant effect on mortality. These findings support the use of extended-window thrombolysis when guided by appropriate clinical or imaging-based selection criteria.

静脉注射阿替普酶治疗缺血性卒中超过4.5小时的疗效、安全性和剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析
目的:评价成人急性缺血性脑卒中患者在常规4.5小时治疗窗期以外静脉注射阿替普酶的疗效、安全性和剂量。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science检索了截至2025年12月的随机对照试验和观察性研究,评估中风发作后超过4.5小时静脉注射阿替普酶的情况,包括唤醒和影像学选择中风。采用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果包括功能恢复、功能独立、症状性颅内出血(siich)和死亡率。还进行了敏感性分析和贝叶斯元分析。结果:10项研究包括2,050例患者符合纳入标准。晚期给药阿替普酶与改善的功能预后相关,包括较高的改良Rankin量表评分(RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.51)和功能独立性(RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28)。治疗与sICH风险增加相关(RR 4.67, 95% CI 1.85-11.76),而死亡率在治疗组和对照组之间无显著差异(RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.73)。贝叶斯分析显示,标准剂量阿替普酶(0.9 mg/kg)具有一致的功能益处,而减少剂量的方案没有显示出一致的功效。结论:在中风发作后超过4.5小时静脉给予阿替普酶与特定患者的功能预后改善相关,尽管有症状性颅内出血的风险增加,但对死亡率没有显著影响。这些发现支持在适当的临床或影像学选择标准指导下使用扩展窗溶栓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书