Radu-Mihai Triculescu, Leonce Röth, Christoph Ivanusch, Klaus H Goetz
{"title":"Presidents, commissioners, and time pressure: A mixed-methods analysis of migration communication by the European Commission.","authors":"Radu-Mihai Triculescu, Leonce Röth, Christoph Ivanusch, Klaus H Goetz","doi":"10.1177/14651165251395315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evolution of the European Commission and its functioning has sparked a broad scholarly debate. However, we know little about how individual Commission members communicate policies. We propose a theoretical framework that presents time pressure as a critical communicative resource to indicate priority and discuss its function for members of the European Commission. Using a comprehensive mixed-methods design that combines state-of-the-art quantitative and qualitative text analysis methods, this article examines how institutional roles, evolving authority, and contextual factors, such as crisis periods, affect the communicative behavior of members of the European Commission. It focuses on the case of migration and asylum policy. We find key differences in how Commission Presidents and responsible Home Affairs Commissioners communicate and invoke time pressure. While Presidents have long emphasized urgency, Commissioners have historically downplayed time pressure. More recently, however, they have also increasingly stressed similar urgency. The qualitative analysis highlights distinct target audiences and framings of the time pressure invocations of Presidents and Commissioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"27 1","pages":"88-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12944555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Union Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165251395315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The evolution of the European Commission and its functioning has sparked a broad scholarly debate. However, we know little about how individual Commission members communicate policies. We propose a theoretical framework that presents time pressure as a critical communicative resource to indicate priority and discuss its function for members of the European Commission. Using a comprehensive mixed-methods design that combines state-of-the-art quantitative and qualitative text analysis methods, this article examines how institutional roles, evolving authority, and contextual factors, such as crisis periods, affect the communicative behavior of members of the European Commission. It focuses on the case of migration and asylum policy. We find key differences in how Commission Presidents and responsible Home Affairs Commissioners communicate and invoke time pressure. While Presidents have long emphasized urgency, Commissioners have historically downplayed time pressure. More recently, however, they have also increasingly stressed similar urgency. The qualitative analysis highlights distinct target audiences and framings of the time pressure invocations of Presidents and Commissioners.
期刊介绍:
European Union Politics is an international academic journal for advanced peer-reviewed research and scholarship on all aspects of the process of government, politics and policy in the European Union. It aims to stimulate debate and provide a forum to bridge the theoretical and empirical analysis on the political unification of Europe. It represents no particular school or approach, nor is it wedded to any particular methodology. In particular it welcomes articles that offer a new theoretical argument, analyze original data in a novel fashion or present an innovative methodological approach. The Editors invite submissions from all sub-fields of contemporary political science, including international relations, comparative politics, public administration, public policy and political theory.