Needs and Gaps in Education and Utilization of Social Determinants of Health in Epilepsy Care: A Survey of American Epilepsy Society Members.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yinchen Song, Meghann Kelly, Erin Fecske, Lisa Clifford, Crystal Epley, Joel M Oster, Hae Won Shin
{"title":"Needs and Gaps in Education and Utilization of Social Determinants of Health in Epilepsy Care: A Survey of American Epilepsy Society Members.","authors":"Yinchen Song, Meghann Kelly, Erin Fecske, Lisa Clifford, Crystal Epley, Joel M Oster, Hae Won Shin","doi":"10.1177/15357597261425347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDoH) are increasingly recognized as critical drivers of health outcomes, influencing care access, treatment adherence, and disease management in people with epilepsy. However, it is unclear how clinicians integrate SDoH concepts into daily practice and what needs remain unmet in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods survey was conducted among members of the American Epilepsy Society (AES) between December 2024 and February 2025 to assess current understanding, practices, challenges, and educational needs related to SDoH. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses were conducted on the survey results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 responses were collected, with 80% from U.S.-based healthcare professionals. Approximately 69.5% reported addressing SDoH in their practice, most frequently focusing on healthcare access and quality, followed by social and community context. Common strategies for addressing SDoH commonly involve systematic screening, telemedicine expansion, and collaboration with social workers or community organizations. Benefits from addressing SDoH-related issues were reflected in improved medication adherence, appointment attendance, and patient engagement. However, effective implementation of SDoH in epilepsy care continues to be challenged by several key barriers, including limited institutional support, lack of standardized screening tools, time constraints, and inadequate access to social work services, mental-health services, and language support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SDoH awareness among AES members is high, significant implementation gaps persist. Respondents emphasized the need for expanded education, multidisciplinary resources, and institutional alignment. These findings underscore opportunities for AES to advance advocacy, professional development, and dissemination of best practices, supporting clinicians and institutions in promoting equitable, outcomes-driven epilepsy care across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11742,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Currents","volume":" ","pages":"15357597261425347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12935572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Currents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597261425347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social determinants of health (SDoH) are increasingly recognized as critical drivers of health outcomes, influencing care access, treatment adherence, and disease management in people with epilepsy. However, it is unclear how clinicians integrate SDoH concepts into daily practice and what needs remain unmet in the field.

Methods: A mixed-methods survey was conducted among members of the American Epilepsy Society (AES) between December 2024 and February 2025 to assess current understanding, practices, challenges, and educational needs related to SDoH. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses were conducted on the survey results.

Results: A total of 189 responses were collected, with 80% from U.S.-based healthcare professionals. Approximately 69.5% reported addressing SDoH in their practice, most frequently focusing on healthcare access and quality, followed by social and community context. Common strategies for addressing SDoH commonly involve systematic screening, telemedicine expansion, and collaboration with social workers or community organizations. Benefits from addressing SDoH-related issues were reflected in improved medication adherence, appointment attendance, and patient engagement. However, effective implementation of SDoH in epilepsy care continues to be challenged by several key barriers, including limited institutional support, lack of standardized screening tools, time constraints, and inadequate access to social work services, mental-health services, and language support.

Conclusions: While SDoH awareness among AES members is high, significant implementation gaps persist. Respondents emphasized the need for expanded education, multidisciplinary resources, and institutional alignment. These findings underscore opportunities for AES to advance advocacy, professional development, and dissemination of best practices, supporting clinicians and institutions in promoting equitable, outcomes-driven epilepsy care across diverse populations.

癫痫护理中健康的社会决定因素的教育和利用的需求和差距:美国癫痫协会成员的调查。
背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)越来越被认为是健康结果的关键驱动因素,影响癫痫患者的护理可及性、治疗依从性和疾病管理。然而,目前尚不清楚临床医生如何将SDoH概念融入日常实践,以及该领域仍有哪些需求未得到满足。方法:在2024年12月至2025年2月期间,对美国癫痫协会(AES)成员进行了一项混合方法调查,以评估目前对SDoH的理解、实践、挑战和教育需求。对调查结果进行了定量和定性数据分析。结果:共收集了189份回复,其中80%来自美国的医疗保健专业人员。大约69.5%的人报告说,他们在实践中解决了SDoH问题,最经常关注的是医疗保健的获取和质量,其次是社会和社区背景。解决SDoH的常见策略通常包括系统筛查、扩展远程医疗以及与社会工作者或社区组织合作。解决sdoh相关问题的好处反映在改善服药依从性、预约出勤率和患者参与度上。然而,在癫痫治疗中有效实施SDoH继续受到几个主要障碍的挑战,包括机构支持有限、缺乏标准化筛查工具、时间限制以及获得社会工作服务、精神卫生服务和语言支持的机会不足。结论:虽然AES成员的SDoH意识很高,但实施差距仍然很大。受访者强调需要扩大教育、多学科资源和机构协调。这些发现强调AES有机会促进宣传、专业发展和传播最佳做法,支持临床医生和机构在不同人群中促进公平、结果驱动的癫痫护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy Currents
Epilepsy Currents CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Currents is an open access, bi-monthly current-awareness journal providing reviews, commentaries and abstracts from the world’s literature on the research and treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsy Currents surveys and comments on all important research and developments in a format that is easy to read and reference. Each issue is divided into two main sections: Basic Science and Clinical Science. An outstanding Editorial Board reviews the literature and assigns topics and articles to world experts for comment. In addition, the Editors commission authoritative review articles on important subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书