Fundamental limits on symmetry breaking by Turing-like activator-inhibitor mechanisms.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Development Pub Date : 2026-08-15 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1242/dev.205067
Daniel Muzatko, Bijoy Daga, Tom W Hiscock
{"title":"Fundamental limits on symmetry breaking by Turing-like activator-inhibitor mechanisms.","authors":"Daniel Muzatko, Bijoy Daga, Tom W Hiscock","doi":"10.1242/dev.205067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Turing's longstanding reaction-diffusion hypothesis explains how molecular patterns can self-organise de novo in otherwise homogeneous tissues. However, whilst Turing-like activator-inhibitor models can qualitatively recapitulate patterning in silico, they are often highly simplified approximations of the molecular complexity operating in vivo. Here, we investigate significantly more complex reaction-diffusion systems that seek to more directly capture the mechanisms involved in intercellular signalling. By combining large-scale simulations with formal mathematical proofs, we show, rather generally, that symmetry breaking is strongly constrained by the extracellular interactions in the system but is relatively insensitive to the intracellular dynamics assumed. When applied to the activator-inhibitor paradigm, we find a broader repertoire of self-organising circuits than previously recognised, including some which are unexpectedly robust to parameters. Beyond these examples, we have packaged our highly performant numerical methods into a freely available and easy-to-use software pipeline, ReactionDiffusion.jl, that allows arbitrarily complex reaction-diffusion systems to be simulated at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":11375,"journal":{"name":"Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.205067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turing's longstanding reaction-diffusion hypothesis explains how molecular patterns can self-organise de novo in otherwise homogeneous tissues. However, whilst Turing-like activator-inhibitor models can qualitatively recapitulate patterning in silico, they are often highly simplified approximations of the molecular complexity operating in vivo. Here, we investigate significantly more complex reaction-diffusion systems that seek to more directly capture the mechanisms involved in intercellular signalling. By combining large-scale simulations with formal mathematical proofs, we show, rather generally, that symmetry breaking is strongly constrained by the extracellular interactions in the system but is relatively insensitive to the intracellular dynamics assumed. When applied to the activator-inhibitor paradigm, we find a broader repertoire of self-organising circuits than previously recognised, including some which are unexpectedly robust to parameters. Beyond these examples, we have packaged our highly performant numerical methods into a freely available and easy-to-use software pipeline, ReactionDiffusion.jl, that allows arbitrarily complex reaction-diffusion systems to be simulated at scale.

类图灵激活-抑制机制对对称破缺的基本限制。
图灵长期存在的反应扩散假说解释了分子模式如何在其他同质组织中自我组织。然而,虽然类似图灵的活化剂-抑制剂模型可以定性地再现硅片上的模式,但它们通常是对体内分子复杂性的高度简化的近似。在这里,我们研究了更复杂的反应扩散系统,寻求更直接地捕捉细胞间信号传导的机制。通过将大规模模拟与正式的数学证明相结合,我们普遍表明,对称破缺受到系统中细胞外相互作用的强烈约束,但对假设的细胞内动力学相对不敏感。当应用于活化剂-抑制剂范式时,我们发现自组织电路的曲目比以前认识到的更广泛,包括一些出乎意料的对参数的鲁棒性。除了这些示例之外,我们还将高性能的数值方法打包到一个免费且易于使用的软件管道中,即ReactionDiffusion。Jl,它允许任意复杂的反应扩散系统进行大规模模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development
Development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Development’s scope covers all aspects of plant and animal development, including stem cell biology and regeneration. The single most important criterion for acceptance in Development is scientific excellence. Research papers (articles and reports) should therefore pose and test a significant hypothesis or address a significant question, and should provide novel perspectives that advance our understanding of development. We also encourage submission of papers that use computational methods or mathematical models to obtain significant new insights into developmental biology topics. Manuscripts that are descriptive in nature will be considered only when they lay important groundwork for a field and/or provide novel resources for understanding developmental processes of broad interest to the community. Development includes a Techniques and Resources section for the publication of new methods, datasets, and other types of resources. Papers describing new techniques should include a proof-of-principle demonstration that the technique is valuable to the developmental biology community; they need not include in-depth follow-up analysis. The technique must be described in sufficient detail to be easily replicated by other investigators. Development will also consider protocol-type papers of exceptional interest to the community. We welcome submission of Resource papers, for example those reporting new databases, systems-level datasets, or genetic resources of major value to the developmental biology community. For all papers, the data or resource described must be made available to the community with minimal restrictions upon publication. To aid navigability, Development has dedicated sections of the journal to stem cells & regeneration and to human development. The criteria for acceptance into these sections is identical to those outlined above. Authors and editors are encouraged to nominate appropriate manuscripts for inclusion in one of these sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书