Evaluation Of Comfort And User-Friendliness Of Immobilizing Internal Rotation-Adduction Shoulder Braces.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
T Coucke, A VAN Bladel, H VAN DER Bracht, T VAN Isacker, B Berghs, A VAN Tongel
{"title":"Evaluation Of Comfort And User-Friendliness Of Immobilizing Internal Rotation-Adduction Shoulder Braces.","authors":"T Coucke, A VAN Bladel, H VAN DER Bracht, T VAN Isacker, B Berghs, A VAN Tongel","doi":"10.52628/91.3.14577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal rotation-adduction shoulder braces are commonly used to immobilize the shoulder following surgery. This prospective, interventional study aimed to evaluate the comfort and user-friendliness of four such braces frequently employed in postoperative care. Four braces-Shoulder Support®, Actimove Umerus Comfort®, Shouldfix II®, and Shoulder Fix®-were assessed across four medical centers. Patient comfort was evaluated using a 14-item Likert scale questionnaire (maximum score: 70). Additionally, 53 healthcare professionals rated each brace's user-friendliness using a separate 5-question survey. A total of 166 patients were included in the analysis. All four braces received favorable comfort ratings. Shoulder Support® achieved the highest comfort score (60.73), significantly outperforming Actimove® (56.12) and Shouldfix II® (56.38). Regarding user-friendliness, Shoulder Support® (3.89) and Actimove® (3.79) were rated significantly higher than Shoulder Fix® (2.99) by healthcare professionals. To conclude, all braces demonstrated good overall comfort, with Shoulder Support® emerging as the most preferred by patients. In terms of ease of use, both Shoulder Support® and Actimove® were favored by healthcare providers. These results highlight the dual importance of patient comfort and clinical practicality in selecting postoperative shoulder braces.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"91 3","pages":"319-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.3.14577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal rotation-adduction shoulder braces are commonly used to immobilize the shoulder following surgery. This prospective, interventional study aimed to evaluate the comfort and user-friendliness of four such braces frequently employed in postoperative care. Four braces-Shoulder Support®, Actimove Umerus Comfort®, Shouldfix II®, and Shoulder Fix®-were assessed across four medical centers. Patient comfort was evaluated using a 14-item Likert scale questionnaire (maximum score: 70). Additionally, 53 healthcare professionals rated each brace's user-friendliness using a separate 5-question survey. A total of 166 patients were included in the analysis. All four braces received favorable comfort ratings. Shoulder Support® achieved the highest comfort score (60.73), significantly outperforming Actimove® (56.12) and Shouldfix II® (56.38). Regarding user-friendliness, Shoulder Support® (3.89) and Actimove® (3.79) were rated significantly higher than Shoulder Fix® (2.99) by healthcare professionals. To conclude, all braces demonstrated good overall comfort, with Shoulder Support® emerging as the most preferred by patients. In terms of ease of use, both Shoulder Support® and Actimove® were favored by healthcare providers. These results highlight the dual importance of patient comfort and clinical practicality in selecting postoperative shoulder braces.

固定化内旋内收肩托的舒适性和使用友好性评价。
内旋内收肩关节支架通常用于手术后固定肩关节。本前瞻性、介入性研究旨在评估四种此类支架在术后护理中常用的舒适性和用户友好性。四种支架——Shoulder Support®、Actimove Umerus Comfort®、Shouldfix II®和Shoulder Fix®——在四个医疗中心进行了评估。采用14项李克特量表(Likert scale)问卷对患者舒适度进行评估(最高分为70分)。此外,53名医疗保健专业人员使用单独的5个问题调查对每个支架的用户友好性进行了评分。共有166例患者被纳入分析。所有四种牙套都获得了良好的舒适度评级。Shoulder Support®获得了最高的舒适评分(60.73),显著优于Actimove®(56.12)和Shouldfix II®(56.38)。在用户友好性方面,医护人员对Shoulder Support®(3.89)和Actimove®(3.79)的评分明显高于Shoulder Fix®(2.99)。综上所述,所有牙套均表现出良好的整体舒适性,肩关节支持®成为患者的首选。在易用性方面,Shoulder Support®和Actimove®都受到医疗保健提供者的青睐。这些结果突出了患者舒适性和临床实用性在选择术后肩托的双重重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书