Healthcare Professionals' Preferences and Needs for Continuing Professional Development Activities: A Q-Methodology Study.

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nicholas Wee Siong Neo, Ruth Chen, Elif Bilgic, Noori Akhtar-Danesh
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals' Preferences and Needs for Continuing Professional Development Activities: A Q-Methodology Study.","authors":"Nicholas Wee Siong Neo, Ruth Chen, Elif Bilgic, Noori Akhtar-Danesh","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2026.2632755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Phenomenon:</i></b> Continuing professional development (CPD) providers innovate and adopt alternate delivery models to better meet the needs of contemporary healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study aims to investigate HCPs' CPD preferences and needs. <b><i>Approach:</i></b> In April 2024, we conducted a cross-sectional, Q-methodology study to investigate the preferences and needs of healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, etc.). We recruited 47 participants for three main study phases: concourse generation, Q-sort, and by-person factor analysis and interpretation. We also recorded demographic characteristics, including age, geographic location, healthcare discipline, and years of practice. <b><i>Findings:</i></b> We derived a Q-sample containing 40 statements related to HCPs' CPD preferences and needs following a review of CPD program evaluation data and a comprehensive literature review. The study participants' age and occupation were evenly distributed but a large majority practiced in Ontario, Canada. We identified four factors, representing different types of CPD participants and their training needs. Value and productivity-focused clinicians preferred convenient and time-efficient CPD activities due to heavy clinical workloads and perceived consequences of work absence. Application and competency-based learners consisted of senior HCPs who prioritized learning activities that were relevant and applicable to clinical practice. Respite seekers and growth-oriented professionals were younger and more interested in training involving nontechnical topics (e.g., leadership, equity, diversity and inclusion). Respite seekers viewed CPD as a retreat while remaining in-practice, but growth-oriented professionals sought to develop skillsets that were transferrable and facilitated role transition. We also identified a single consensus statement that highlighted neutral viewpoints toward the need for CPD activities to have \"appropriate difficulty and volume of content.\" <b><i>Insights:</i></b> Q-methodology facilitated deeper understanding of regional CPD preferences and needs, uncovering viewpoints masked by social desirability and professional expectations. These preferences and needs were also potentially influenced by structural issues and demographic factors (age, levels of experience). Greater needs-matching and alignment with government policies and profession-specific regulatory standards can improve meaningful learning and CPD uptake. Future research should conduct more in-depth analysis of the identified factors through comprehensive demographic data collection and longitudinal designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2632755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phenomenon: Continuing professional development (CPD) providers innovate and adopt alternate delivery models to better meet the needs of contemporary healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study aims to investigate HCPs' CPD preferences and needs. Approach: In April 2024, we conducted a cross-sectional, Q-methodology study to investigate the preferences and needs of healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, etc.). We recruited 47 participants for three main study phases: concourse generation, Q-sort, and by-person factor analysis and interpretation. We also recorded demographic characteristics, including age, geographic location, healthcare discipline, and years of practice. Findings: We derived a Q-sample containing 40 statements related to HCPs' CPD preferences and needs following a review of CPD program evaluation data and a comprehensive literature review. The study participants' age and occupation were evenly distributed but a large majority practiced in Ontario, Canada. We identified four factors, representing different types of CPD participants and their training needs. Value and productivity-focused clinicians preferred convenient and time-efficient CPD activities due to heavy clinical workloads and perceived consequences of work absence. Application and competency-based learners consisted of senior HCPs who prioritized learning activities that were relevant and applicable to clinical practice. Respite seekers and growth-oriented professionals were younger and more interested in training involving nontechnical topics (e.g., leadership, equity, diversity and inclusion). Respite seekers viewed CPD as a retreat while remaining in-practice, but growth-oriented professionals sought to develop skillsets that were transferrable and facilitated role transition. We also identified a single consensus statement that highlighted neutral viewpoints toward the need for CPD activities to have "appropriate difficulty and volume of content." Insights: Q-methodology facilitated deeper understanding of regional CPD preferences and needs, uncovering viewpoints masked by social desirability and professional expectations. These preferences and needs were also potentially influenced by structural issues and demographic factors (age, levels of experience). Greater needs-matching and alignment with government policies and profession-specific regulatory standards can improve meaningful learning and CPD uptake. Future research should conduct more in-depth analysis of the identified factors through comprehensive demographic data collection and longitudinal designs.

医疗保健专业人员对持续专业发展活动的偏好和需求:一项q -方法学研究。
现象:持续专业发展(CPD)提供者创新并采用替代交付模式,以更好地满足当代医疗保健专业人员(hcp)的需求。本研究旨在探讨医护人员持续专业进修的偏好和需求。方法:我们于2024年4月进行了一项横断面q -方法学研究,以调查医疗保健专业人员(医生、护士、专职医疗专业人员等)的偏好和需求。我们在三个主要研究阶段招募了47名参与者:集合生成、q排序和个人因素分析和解释。我们还记录了人口统计学特征,包括年龄、地理位置、医疗学科和执业年限。研究结果:在回顾了CPD项目评估数据和全面的文献回顾后,我们得出了一个q样本,其中包含40个与HCPs的CPD偏好和需求相关的陈述。研究参与者的年龄和职业分布均匀,但大多数人在加拿大安大略省执业。我们确定了四个因素,代表了不同类型的持续专业进修学员及其培训需求。由于繁重的临床工作量和缺勤的后果,注重价值和生产力的临床医生更喜欢方便和时间效率高的CPD活动。以应用和能力为基础的学习者由高级医护人员组成,他们优先考虑与临床实践相关和适用的学习活动。寻求喘息机会的人和以成长为导向的专业人士更年轻,对涉及非技术主题(例如领导力、公平、多样性和包容性)的培训更感兴趣。寻求喘息机会的人认为持续专业进修是一种静修,同时仍在实践中,但以成长为导向的专业人士寻求发展可转移和促进角色转换的技能。我们还确定了一个单一的共识声明,强调了对CPD活动需要“适当的难度和内容量”的中立观点。洞察:q -方法论有助于更深入地了解地区持续专业发展的偏好和需求,揭示被社会期望和专业期望掩盖的观点。这些偏好和需求也可能受到结构性问题和人口因素(年龄、经验水平)的影响。更大程度的需求匹配和与政府政策和专业特定监管标准的一致性可以提高有意义的学习和持续专业发展的吸收。未来的研究应通过全面的人口统计数据收集和纵向设计,对确定的因素进行更深入的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书