Supporting teachers in a war zone: a mixed methods study of a brief intervention in the context of ongoing war.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gerlinde C Harb, Majed Qishawi, Steffi Gebus, Jon-Håkon Schultz
{"title":"Supporting teachers in a war zone: a mixed methods study of a brief intervention in the context of ongoing war.","authors":"Gerlinde C Harb, Majed Qishawi, Steffi Gebus, Jon-Håkon Schultz","doi":"10.1186/s13031-026-00775-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the ongoing war in Gaza, teachers face a dual burden as caregivers supporting traumatized children and as community members exposed to the same violence and trauma. Teachers are therefore at high risk for burnout and supporting teachers' well-being is critical during war. In the context of extreme stress and crisis, supporting those who deliver psychosocial support to children is essential. This paper presents the development, implementation and piloting of an intervention to improve teachers' psychological well-being self-care during war.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bottom-up approach was used to assess the needs and difficulties of Gazan teachers using \"listening sessions,\" and a group intervention was co-developed in collaboration with those living and working in the war zone. A mixed-methods design was employed for the pilot study, utilizing quantitative data from a pre- and post-assessment tool completed by teachers in Gaza (n = 33) and in the West Bank (n = 24), alongside qualitative data from listening sessions with teachers, steering committee meetings, and field notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Listening sessions revealed that Gazan teachers felt overwhelmed by intense and ongoing traumatic events and loss alongside significant ongoing external stressors. Based on these findings, a 3-session intervention focusing on self-care and peer support was developed and piloted. Quantitative data showed significant pre-post improvements in well-being (t(48) = 7.48), coping skills (t(48) = 7.13), and sense of meaning t(49) = 3.56), while qualitative findings highlighted increased cognitive flexibility and focus through social support, new awareness and insights, and coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This brief and feasible support intervention for teachers showed significant very positive effects on their subjective sense of well-being and coping in the midst of war stressors. It is expected that the teachers' improved coping during wartime will also increase their ability to positively interact with the stressed and traumatized children they support in educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13059261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-026-00775-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the ongoing war in Gaza, teachers face a dual burden as caregivers supporting traumatized children and as community members exposed to the same violence and trauma. Teachers are therefore at high risk for burnout and supporting teachers' well-being is critical during war. In the context of extreme stress and crisis, supporting those who deliver psychosocial support to children is essential. This paper presents the development, implementation and piloting of an intervention to improve teachers' psychological well-being self-care during war.

Methods: A bottom-up approach was used to assess the needs and difficulties of Gazan teachers using "listening sessions," and a group intervention was co-developed in collaboration with those living and working in the war zone. A mixed-methods design was employed for the pilot study, utilizing quantitative data from a pre- and post-assessment tool completed by teachers in Gaza (n = 33) and in the West Bank (n = 24), alongside qualitative data from listening sessions with teachers, steering committee meetings, and field notes.

Results: Listening sessions revealed that Gazan teachers felt overwhelmed by intense and ongoing traumatic events and loss alongside significant ongoing external stressors. Based on these findings, a 3-session intervention focusing on self-care and peer support was developed and piloted. Quantitative data showed significant pre-post improvements in well-being (t(48) = 7.48), coping skills (t(48) = 7.13), and sense of meaning t(49) = 3.56), while qualitative findings highlighted increased cognitive flexibility and focus through social support, new awareness and insights, and coping strategies.

Conclusions: This brief and feasible support intervention for teachers showed significant very positive effects on their subjective sense of well-being and coping in the midst of war stressors. It is expected that the teachers' improved coping during wartime will also increase their ability to positively interact with the stressed and traumatized children they support in educational settings.

战区支援教师:持续战争背景下短暂干预的混合方法研究。
背景:在加沙持续不断的战争中,教师面临着双重负担,他们既是受创伤儿童的照顾者,又是遭受同样暴力和创伤的社区成员。因此,教师有很高的职业倦怠风险,在战争期间,支持教师的福祉至关重要。在极端压力和危机的背景下,支持那些向儿童提供社会心理支持的人至关重要。本文介绍了一种改善战争时期教师心理健康自我护理的干预措施的开发、实施和试点。方法:采用自下而上的方法,通过“倾听课程”来评估加沙教师的需求和困难,并与在战区生活和工作的人合作开发了小组干预。试点研究采用混合方法设计,利用加沙(n = 33)和西岸(n = 24)教师完成的评估前和评估后工具的定量数据,以及教师聆听会议、指导委员会会议和实地记录的定性数据。结果:听力课程显示,加沙教师感到被强烈和持续的创伤事件和损失以及重大的持续外部压力所压倒。基于这些发现,一个以自我照顾和同伴支持为重点的3期干预被开发和试点。定量数据显示,志愿者在幸福感(t(48) = 7.48)、应对技能(t(48) = 7.13)和意义感(t(49) = 3.56)方面有显著改善,而定性研究结果强调,通过社会支持、新的意识和见解以及应对策略,认知灵活性和注意力得到了提高。结论:这一简单可行的支持干预对教师的主观幸福感和战争应激的应对有显著的积极作用。预计教师在战时应对能力的提高也将提高他们与他们在教育环境中所支持的压力和创伤儿童积极互动的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书